Quote: (11-01-2016 12:49 AM)Thersites Wrote:
Quote: (10-31-2016 10:59 PM)spydersuit Wrote:
Are there any more academically inclined members out there that would be interested in creating a peer reviewed 'Journal of Neomasculinity'? The goal would to provide discussion, review, and scientific research articles to the audience.
To create an journal is way to set up SJW/Leftist/Cucks to co-opting the movement and dictating its idea. For example, the National Review under George Will.
Neomasculinity is still in its infancy of the movement. We must let Neomasculinity grow and develop organically from grassroots and up. Further a discussion and refinement of ideas among the tribe here and other members of manosphere should occur. Neomasculinity is not academic subject contain in the ivory towers, but way a life that men and women can look upon on its examples among them.
Quote: (10-31-2016 10:59 PM)spydersuit Wrote:
Furthermore, a small neomasculinity department at a large university could have a large impact on society. Especially over time.
In current environment of academic, it will not happen. Additional issue, is another avenue of destruction. It creates a point of authority that a person can define neomasculinity. Professor of Neomasculinity will get the talking heads in the media and general public to think he figurehead of the movement.
Neomasculinity's development belongs to Roosh and Quintus.
----------------------------------------------------------
I could not disagree more. The National Review is hardly a peer reviewed journal. It like comparing
People to
Nature.
If you don't define it in
peer reviewed written literature, the feminists will. Thousands of students are required to take liberal arts classes that focus on women's issues (among other things). They sit there and have all this bullshit pumped into their heads with no counter argument within the school. The students need an alternative option.
For example, a university allowed this to happen after an IRB review: Nicholas, A., Brody, S., De Sutter, P., & De Carufel, F. (2008). A woman's history of vaginal orgasm is discernible from her walk. The journal of sexual medicine, 5(9), 2119-2124.
Furthermore, a tenured professor is protected and can say whatever he/she wants to without fear of recourse. Personally, I have created 1 academic department and 1 laboratory. If you have money, then a university will let a tenured professor pretty much do anything they want to. To me, it sounds like you are not familiar with the mechanics and reality of academia.
Also, avoiding the fight does not make the fight go away. Yes, professors serve as points of authority because they have earned the right to do so. The technology you're using right now was invented by professors (the Internet, the thousands of pieces in your computer). Academics don't "own" ideas, and writing is a means to effectively communicate.
Cheers,
spydersuit