A ROK writer recently said:
This may have been generally true. Most Alt-Right/red pill types were born after 1985, so they were able to develop a worldview of their own instead of being continuously blue pilled. Before that, it seems like a lot of sixties students were still young and mildly rebellious when Leftist activists managed to get in charge.
Yet I am skeptical about how individuals cannot change their worldview after they hit an early age (one's first job comes before 30 so it is still early). If one manages not to get red-pilled by reality before he's 30, will he remain a beta for life? If one is a Leftist, spread-the-wealth or party-goer type, can't he turn aware of human diversity or wilful to protect his own?
We should probably consider the whole case according to a variety of more particular factors. For example,
- if one has compromised by befriending with people of various ethnicities including strongly communautarian ones,
- if one identifies with such things as "humanity" or "progress" (seen from an anti-White and anti-male Leftist perspective) rather than one's own blood and culture
- if one believes into the existence of a malevolent "far right" and sees it as important and relevant...
Each part of the general Leftist worldview should be mapped and delineated according to the relevance it has into keeping the Leftist's view from falling on the ground. But before we do that, especially since it would take some time, I would like to ask at what age you took the red pill.
Perhaps you would be blue-pilled anti-Trump male feminists had you been born 20 years earlier, or perhaps you would be a milquetoast version of today rabid SJWs.
Quote:Quote:
Turning someone’s ideological orientation is almost impossible for both men and women... Rather, most of us get our general political orientation from our parents or, as the role of parents in raising children continues to shrink, from our peers or teachers. Once we enter adulthood, we are likely to be on the same political end of the spectrum that we were on when we got our first full time job.
This may have been generally true. Most Alt-Right/red pill types were born after 1985, so they were able to develop a worldview of their own instead of being continuously blue pilled. Before that, it seems like a lot of sixties students were still young and mildly rebellious when Leftist activists managed to get in charge.
Yet I am skeptical about how individuals cannot change their worldview after they hit an early age (one's first job comes before 30 so it is still early). If one manages not to get red-pilled by reality before he's 30, will he remain a beta for life? If one is a Leftist, spread-the-wealth or party-goer type, can't he turn aware of human diversity or wilful to protect his own?
We should probably consider the whole case according to a variety of more particular factors. For example,
- if one has compromised by befriending with people of various ethnicities including strongly communautarian ones,
- if one identifies with such things as "humanity" or "progress" (seen from an anti-White and anti-male Leftist perspective) rather than one's own blood and culture
- if one believes into the existence of a malevolent "far right" and sees it as important and relevant...
Each part of the general Leftist worldview should be mapped and delineated according to the relevance it has into keeping the Leftist's view from falling on the ground. But before we do that, especially since it would take some time, I would like to ask at what age you took the red pill.
Perhaps you would be blue-pilled anti-Trump male feminists had you been born 20 years earlier, or perhaps you would be a milquetoast version of today rabid SJWs.