[DamienCasanova]

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/...03501.html

Women are 'genetically programmed to have affairs'

'Lifelong monogamy does not characterise the primary mating patterns of humans,' says Dr David Buss from the University of Texas

Women are predisposed by their genetics to have affairs as "back-up plans'" if their relationships fail, according to a research paper.

Scientists at the University of Texas say they are challenging the assumption that humans have evolved to have monogamous relationships.

The team's research has put forward the "mate-switching-hypothesis" which says humans have evolved to keep testing their relationships and looking for better long-term options.

The senior author of the research, Dr David Buss, told the Sunday Times: "Lifelong monogamy does not characterise the primary mating patterns of humans.

"Breaking up with one partner and mating with another may more accurately characterise the common, perhaps the primary, mating strategy of humans."

For our distant ancestors – when disease, poor diet and minimal healthcare meant that few people lived past 30 - looking for a more suitable partner was necessary, researchers assert.

Despite anecdotal claims about cheatng, no study has shown that humans are predisposed to monogamy or non-monogamy.

A study carried out by Rafael Wlodarski and a team of researchers at Oxford University looking into infidelity found a correlation between the length of a individual's ring finger and the likelihood that they would cheat on a partner.

However, they stressed that they could not find a causal link.

Professor Robin Dunbar of Oxford University said the differences were “subtle” and “only visible when we look at large groups of people”.

"Human behaviour is influenced by many factors, such as the environment and life experience, and what happens in the womb might only have a modest effect on something as complex as sexual relationships," he said.

Dr Buss said: "Affairs serve as a form of mate insurance, keeping a back-up mate should a switch become warranted in the future.’

"A regular mate may cheat, defect, die, or decline in mate value.

"Ancestral women lacking a back-up mate would have suffered a lapse in protection, and resources."
------------------------------------------------

Science is finally coming around to confirm the reality of female hypergamy we have been aware of for some time now.

[EDantes]

From what I know, men are more naturally disposed to seek out multiple partners, but they tend to be easier pleased by the partner (or partners) they're with.

By default women prefer to only be with one partner at a time, but they're harder to keep pleased, so if a husband becomes slothful or loses his manhood after getting married she's more likely to have an affair.

Plus economics and culture will play a big role here too - in older areas where communities were smaller and more close-knit there were fewer potential options, and more social repercussions for infidelity.

In today's world of huge urban populations, Tinder, and hookup culture there are far more "perceived" options out there than before so it naturally makes sense that people are less reluctant to commit.

[Easy_C]

I just saw this story on drudge and immediately hopped over to RVF because I knew this one was going to get reposted within a matter of minutes.

Was not let down.

[LINUX]

I've experienced enough in my own life to know a woman is going to be a whole lot more faithful to me than I will be to her. I have never in my life had trouble finding a woman that would be faithful to me and I have probably cheated on every women that I have ever had.

If the majority of women in your life cheat on you, they are not the problem, you are the problem. The sad fact is that you have nothing to offer them worth them keeping you around.

This is why guys need to learn true "game". True game isn't learning how to fuck a girl. True game is making a woman make you her fantasy -- unable to live and function without having you in her life, even if it's just temporarily. You can't read how to do that in a book or by watching day game videos. It takes many years of understanding masculine/feminine polarization and cutting out all the bullshit that some of these PUA have taught over the years.

[Mage]

1) This is written in a mainstream source so it is surely propaganda.

2) This is a very clever mainstream propaganda aimed at red pill men by exploiting our (usually justified) prejudice of women.

3) The goal of this propaganda is to create a paradigm that female unfaithfulness is genetically hardwired therefore unavoidable therefore justified.

4)Don't buy this shit. Women are perfectly capable of being faithful in long term, including lifetime faithfulness if society expects them to be. Keep society religious and keep women occupied with childcare and housework and magically science will conclude that women are naturally monogamous. Destroy every moral absolute, keep women's wombs barren and feed them stupid ideas trough false education and science will turnaround and say all women are naturally prone to cheat.

5) You must know better then nerdy scientists and corrupt journalists seeking for shocking headlines. Scientists only make conclusions in the short confines of their experiments, but nature punishes and rewards in a span of generations, but surely and precisely. You must have eternal wisdom instead that includes the experience of more experienced, men, great men of history, fathers and forefathers, ancient men and forebears who built great moral codes that elevated the human race from apes to men.

6) Another way I interpreted this article is "alpha fucks beta bucks" - yes women will always seek to extract to resources from beta men even if she has committed to receive the seed of a single alpha man. But the nerdy scientists who are not aware this dynamic simply explain it as women ready to cheat for resources. Truth is most women flirt with beta men for resources all the time but only give pussy for resources if their children are starving or they are degenerates like hookers on crack. Women give pussy for tingles not resources and most women are perfectly capable to limit their tingles only for one man if society has working moral norms..

[EDantes]

(08-22-2016 03:11 PM)LINUX Wrote:  

I've experienced enough in my own life to know a woman is going to be a whole lot more faithful to me than I will be to her. I have never in my life had trouble finding a woman that would be faithful to me and I have probably cheated on every women that I have ever had.

If the majority of women in your life cheat on you, they are not the problem, you are the problem. The sad fact is that you have nothing to offer them worth them keeping you around.

I think it's a little different - when men cheat they usually don't think of it as "infidelity" because men are hardwired by default to seek out multiple partners (I mean since men can impregnate several women at once it is biologically natural, even though culturally frowned upon).

When women cheat on the other hand, it's almost always because they're dissatisfied with the partner they're with.

Though the idea that all women are completely "pure" and only cheat if the man isn't being a man isn't really true either. I'm sure there are plenty of entitled women out there who overestimate their own value, and think they're entitled to date Brad Pitt, so they cheat anytime they think their "status" might be enhanced by doing so.

[LINUX]

(08-22-2016 03:15 PM)EDantes Wrote:  

I think it's a little different - when men cheat they usually don't think of it as "infidelity" because men are hardwired by default to seek out multiple partners (I mean since men can impregnate several women at once it is biologically natural, even though culturally frowned upon).

That's forum/manosphere talk. And it's also an excuse guys use to fuck around. And while it is true that we are hardwired to seek out multiple partners, I don't buy into that as an excuse.

Guys who cheat on their wife know they are cheating and they know they are about to fuck up and they can stop at any time they choose. "I'm hardwired to do it" -- Give me a break. If you can't keep your dick in your pants, then don't get married. It's the exact same reason why I'm not married.

I'm not going to blame my biology as an excuse to fuck around on my wife. That's like a woman slashing my truck tires and burning down my house and then saying, "Don't blame me, it's biology, I'm PMS'ing." And then man saying, "Oh yeah, that's right, no problem, not your fault, it's just a temporarily increase in your estrogen levels"

Every human being is responsible for his/her own actions and reactions. You get no freebies in this lifetime. If you fuck up you have to own up to it like a man instead of looking for things to blame it on. You great grandfathers probably spent 50 years being faithful to the same woman without ever making one excuse.

[EDantes]

(08-22-2016 03:50 PM)LINUX Wrote:  

That's forum/manosphere talk. And it's also an excuse guys use to fuck around. And while it is true that we are hardwired to seek out multiple partners, I don't buy into that as an excuse.

I'm not talking about "fucking around" - I'm talking about consensual polygamy/polyamory with multiple, stable wives and partners, such as King Solomon's harem in the Bible.

In many cultures this was a norm; "hooking up" or "pumping and dumping" is a different thing entirely and has been more or less universally frowned upon for obvious reasons, such as it potentially leading to men making bastard children and then welshing on the fatherhood responsibilities and leaving it up to society or tax payers to raise the offspring he made.

Quote:

Guys who cheat on their wife know they are cheating and they know they are about to fuck up and they can stop at any time they choose. "I'm hardwired to do it" -- Give me a break. If you can't keep your dick in your pants, then don't get married. It's the exact same reason why I'm not married.

Being "hardwired" doesn't make it "right" to act on impulse, it's just a statement of biological fact.

People are hardwired to seek revenge or retribution when they are wronged, but this doesn't always make it "good".

Quote:

I'm not going to blame my biology as an excuse to fuck around on my wife. That's like a woman slashing my truck tires and burning down my house and then saying, "Don't blame me, it's biology, I'm PMS'ing." And then man saying, "Oh yeah, that's right, no problem, not your fault, it's just a temporarily increase in your estrogen levels"

Every human being is responsible for his/her own actions and reactions. You get no freebies in this lifetime. If you fuck up you have to own up to it like a man instead of looking for things to blame it on. You great grandfathers probably spent 50 years being faithful to the same woman without ever making one excuse.

You're reading into things which were never said - it's simply explaining the difference in psychology between men and women, not justifying it.

Basically, even if a man is in love with his HS sweetheart he married 20 years ago, if he sees a hot young bimbo at a nightclub his animal instinct is still going to want to "get busy with her" so he has to constantly be on his guard and use self discipline.

With women however, the instinct to "sleep around" doesn't kick in as much unless she's in some way disgusted with the man she happens to be with, or possibly thinks she might benefit somewhat in "status" for doing so.

Just off the top of my head for example, I remember being briefly involved with a young 7/10 girl several years ago who told me about how her ex-boyfriend cheated on her with some 3/10 whale.

On the flip side I would find it a lot harder to imagine a woman cheating with a man she perceives of "lower value" than the one she's already with.

[General Stalin]

Whatever bullshit buzz popscience this "study" is trying to push - infidelity is about 99% cultural. Women fuck around on their partners are lot more than they used to because they are permitted to. they are practically told to.

As Linux said, our grandparents/great grandparents were likely faithful to eachother for the entirety of their marriage and likely only had sex with a few people their entire lives. Times have changed and everyone is fucking no holds barred.

[realologist]

(08-22-2016 09:01 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  

Whatever bullshit buzz popscience this "study" is trying to push - infidelity is about 99% cultural. Women fuck around on their partners are lot more than they used to because they are permitted to. they are practically told to.

As Linux said, our grandparents/great grandparents were likely faithful to eachother for the entirety of their marriage and likely only had sex with a few people their entire lives. Times have changed and everyone is fucking no holds barred.

The sad part is people are having less sex than they used to. More partners, less sex, more depression and less happiness.

[General Stalin]

I feel like that statistic is also bullshit. Obviously this is purely my opinion from my personal observation, but I find it incredibly hard to believe young adults are somehow having less sex than they have the past couple decades just from where I'm standing. Everything is about hooking up these days.

[realologist]

(08-22-2016 09:19 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  

I feel like that statistic is also bullshit. Obviously this is purely my opinion from my personal observation, but I find it incredibly hard to believe young adults are somehow having less sex than they have the past couple decades just from where I'm standing. Everything is about hooking up these days.

I don't. I agree with more hook ups and more partners but not that are you having more sex. When do you get more sex?

When you are banging a new chick every week or two plus another girl in the rotation or when you are in a LTR and you are fucking basically every day.

[General Stalin]

I suppose I didn't think of it in terms of frequency of sex - more so how many people we bang/how often we bang new people.

[Khan]

(08-22-2016 09:19 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  

I feel like that statistic is also bullshit. Obviously this is purely my opinion from my personal observation, but I find it incredibly hard to believe young adults are somehow having less sex than they have the past couple decades just from where I'm standing. Everything is about hooking up these days.

I disagree. Everything is about hooking up, but how many people regularly hook up with someone? More precisely, how many men regularly do so?

In the past, when our culture was still patriarchal, the norm for male-female relationships was LTR->marriage. Female hypergamy wasn't unleashed yet and every average dude got a chance to get some ass, provided he wasn't some outcast bum. Men were on average more manly, so women had less problems with feeling genuine sexual attraction for their husbands. And just in case of any possible doubts, her mother and grandmother would ensure she understood the social rules of the time - "if you're not willing to put out for him, some other girl will. And then when he dumps you, you'll become a neighborhood disgrace."

In those days, people had regular sex within marriage. Only a minority could enjoy hookups and extramarital affairs.

Nowadays, the rule is alpha fucks, beta bucks. The average man today, who has no grasp of Game, gets very little attention from women. He'll be happy to marry the first girlfriend that doesn't dump him after a couple of months, because that's the only way he can ensure he gets some. After she gives birth to a child or two, the party is over. "I'm not in the mood today" "I have a headache" We've all heard of how it goes.

The only group that gets more sex today than they did in the past are alphas and players. I believe the majority of women have slightly less sex - getting pumped and dumped by alphas in their youth and then entering spinsterhood territory in their 30s is becoming the norm. On the other hand, betas (the majority of men actually) have never had it worse. I think if you went to any college campus today, you'd find out that only alphas have regular hookups, while the majority of men have to watch from the sidelines and live off crumbs that fall from the table. 50 years ago, men in that age bracket (early 20s) would either be in a LTR or already married, thus having sex on a regular basis.

So on average, I'd say that those statistics are really true. People on average do have less sex nowadays, and betas contribute the most to those numbers. They are the biggest losers in the game.

[Barron]

The term "cheating" was invented by feminists to vilify a man's innate desire to procreate with multiple partners.

"Cheating" for a man means revoking what is valuable to him (his time & resources) from the woman he is committed to and investing it in another female.

"Cheating" for a woman means revoking or sharing what is valuable to her (her body) from the man she is committed to and giving it to another male(s).

No guy gives a shit if his girl is hanging out with betas so long as she remains his personal slut. But feminism has conflated the language to equate male infidelity with cheating. Nothing could be further from the truth.

[N°6]

(08-22-2016 09:19 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  

I feel like that statistic is also bullshit. Obviously this is purely my opinion from my personal observation, but I find it incredibly hard to believe young adults are somehow having less sex than they have the past couple decades just from where I'm standing. Everything is about hooking up these days.

Like the creation of cheap money, the increased supply of cheap (hook-up) sex has shifted upwards to higher status men. In other words, involuntary male celibacy has increased with women delaying marriage until circa 30.

[NapoleonDynamighty]

Women due to nature and nurture have historically , traditionally always conquered and achieved in life by way of her pussy . From Lady Macbeth to Marie Curie they always needed a man's skills that they could control via their honey dripping beehive . Why would they give up on that one god/nature given means of power they posses just by being faithful to one person when they can flaunt it and tease and control the men around her?

Every time something goes wrong the women use it as an excuse to whore around .

My husband doesn't give me enough time so I slept around ,
not enough attention so I looked for it elsewhere,
doesn't care about pleasing me , cunnilingus or my orgasms so I went to the car mechanic to fix my chevy and snatch,
My son failed his a levels so I had to fuck my neighbour who comforted me during my turmoils.

Wimmin got 99 excuses and being faithful ain't one !

[The Beast1]

I'd give Linux another rep point if i could. 100% agreed on all points.

[Tim in real life]

(08-22-2016 02:45 PM)EDantes Wrote:  

From what I know, men are more naturally disposed to seek out multiple partners, but they tend to be easier pleased by the partner (or partners) they're with.

By default women prefer to only be with one partner at a time, but they're harder to keep pleased, so if a husband becomes slothful or loses his manhood after getting married she's more likely to have an affair.

Plus economics and culture will play a big role here too - in older areas where communities were smaller and more close-knit there were fewer potential options, and more social repercussions for infidelity.

In today's world of huge urban populations, Tinder, and hookup culture there are far more "perceived" options out there than before so it naturally makes sense that people are less reluctant to commit.

LOL, what is this? A validation paper why it's okay for pre-Crusades Englishwomen to cuckold their husbands and sell out their country to the Vikings?

No motherfucking wonder pre-Crusades Englishwomen were dickriding the Vikings.

Addendum: keep in mind every single sex study out of the UK is for Anglo consumption ONLY.