[NovaVirtu]

(08-12-2016 04:53 PM)Irenicus Wrote:  

Holy shit man.

I would dump her ass at the spot. I do not give a damn if she is made from a genetic material of David Beckham, Ivanka Trump, Little Dark and Jennifer Lopez by some mad scientist in his mother's garage. This personality is toxic, and anyone who will be unfortunate to marry her will one day regret the day he met her. Guaranteed.

You dodged a SCUD missile right here.

[kaotic]

Out in this area you'll see that skater/surfer look with slim cut button ups. Throw on some slim shorts and vans authentic lace ups with low cut socks and that's the summer.

The reason I know is because of my retail job on the weekends, it's what's in, and what we sell. Oh and pocket tees also.

Real men shit standing up.

[Rawmeo]

I always live by the "you can't require faithfulness if you are not better than the competition" mantra. Examples include:

- Forbidding your employees from having a second job / hustle but offering them minimum wage
- Forbidding dual citizenship in your country but offering a passport that makes you need a visa to cross the street
- Forbidding bringing your own drinks but offering only 2 kinds of beer
- Making your own rules in the relationship if your SMV is lower than the potential women your man can get

This works equally for both sexes. You can't make your own rules if your SMV is lower than the other people your partner can get.. For example, in order to require your man to follow those 10 rules, you need to be more pretty, more "wife material", and have more to offer than the girls he is likely to meet while on that trip. And as a man, you can't force your girlfriend to be faithful if you work minimum wage and she is in position to meet better men.

Which brings me to the second point: If your SMV is higher than the potential girls he will meet, then you shouldn't even have to make such rules, because he will instinctively be faithful. Therefore, this only makes the girl look like a psycho, and since he is kind of good looking, he should just go hunting.

[EDantes]

Guess stuff like this just adds to my relationship cynicism.

If someone, man or woman, is so paranoid of the person they're with that they have to threaten them, then why be in a relationship to begin with? Just sounds like self-imposed hell to me. Ditch your boyfriend and get a poodle or something, then you never have to worry about it "cheating on you".

Stuff like this is the reason guys become pickup artists - not because they're all dirty horndogs, but because when they see how many miserable and dysfunctional couples their are who put on a pretense of being "happily ever after" with each other just to keep up appearances with the Jones', they just rationally conclude that being a PUA is the smarter option.

[They Call Me Mister Tony]

Yeah...and ladies have the gall to complain that there are no good men in the world. Probably because they're all being driven away by batshit, whacked out girls like this.

[AFS]

If she was actually worried about cheating, she would never publish a list like this.

If you're good at game, your girl is at home praying on her hands and knees that you aren't speaking to other women. She would fear making a list like this would only provoke you to do the opposite.

Seems like domineering behavior masked as "cute" relationship stuff.

[Veloce]

She's cheating on him.

[Mr. D]

[kurti]

When I look at these "rules" I get the feeling the girl is probably only half serious, if that.
She's insecure, jealous, likes drama and wants to see with what she can get away with.

[RIslander]

So she's a typical insecure chick, big deal. I find her posters kind of cute.



WB and then make fun of her for being insecure.

[Deuce Anna Half]

(08-15-2016 02:06 AM)Veloce Wrote:  

She's cheating on him.

First thought I had too. That kind of overbearing shit is usually projection. She'd get some miscellaneous dick while on vacation with the girls, so naturally she assumes he would too.