Quote: (07-09-2016 12:10 AM)LeoneVolpe Wrote:
They're setting everyone (including themselves) up for an eventual Islamic takeover...is that their plan?
Takeover, no. Replacement of their existing livestock, yes. They've been wanting one or more different breeds of livestock, than the ones they currently have, for a long time now. Look what they did in the soviet union during WW2. European men to the fronts. Replaced in the fields and factories by Central Asians.
Quote:Quote:
Surely, they can't think they'll be able to control those savages once they've flooded all of Europe and the United States, can they?
Why not? They have rather more control over the rest of us, and most people's sense of "reality", than perhaps you quite realize yet. The current state of herd manipulation is quite advanced.
To understand just how much the elites are able to manipulate other people's sense of reality, you need to understand what really happened on 9-11.
If they can pull that off, in front of the eyes of hundreds of millions of people, and those who protest regarding what they can see with their own eyes are relugated to the tinfoil hat brigade...what else do you suppose they can pull off? A great deal of what people think is consensual reality is in fact imposed from above.
Quote:Quote:
I understand the elite's wealth keeps them location independent, but where will they run once the forces of Islam invade and are primarily concerned with lopping the heads off of nonbelievers wherever they might find them? What good will all their money be then? Islam will not submit to their One World Government unless they are that government.
"Islam" is an abstraction, not a person. It doesn't submit, or not, although ironically, it is taken to mean "submission to the will of Allah''. Islam is a totalitarian belief system. From the point of a plutocrat, THAT'S A GOOD THING.
The question is who gets to play Allah. THE MUSLIMS HAVE ALREADY BEEN MANIPULATED FOR YEARS.
Who do you think really holds the leash of ISIS/DaEsh?
By the way...one reason all of this might be counterintuitive...bear in mind that their standard operating procedure is to organize BOTH SIDES of a conflict...ALWAYS...they always set up their own controlled opposition. That's standard practice for them.
It's a trick to create the illusion of choice and free action, that always resolves in a direction that is acceptable to them.
So for example, some nationalist parties in Europe are manipulated by them. That useful idiot Anders Breivik was terribly useful to them in furthering their agenda. First he helpfully massacred a group of blond-haired, blue-eyed Norwegian kids. And in doing so, triggered the pro-immigration, socialist backlash that furthers their agenda even more. Read his manifesto and look at the names of people who influenced him.
So be careful about jumping on other people's bandwagons, because both the pro and the con work for the same puppet-master behind the scenes. It's one of their many tricks to script history.