[Rhyme or Reason]

(06-29-2016 04:36 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

I see these being quickly-banned due to women's privacy and stalking concerns - and partly because the online persona is becoming so Constructed and Carefully-Managed that girls will be terrified of someone, somewhere seeing a non-staged version of them.

I've noticed most gyms I've been to in the last six months have a 'no selfies' rule because of the female belief that, yes, they are that hot that men are obviously trying to creep pictures of them.

I don't see how a "no selfies" rule is supposed to prevent people taking pictures of others.

[AnonymousBosch]

(06-30-2016 10:28 AM)Red_Pillage Wrote:  

I don't see how a "no selfies" rule is supposed to prevent people taking pictures of others.

You're not seeing the psychology at play. It's shaming behaviour.

The implication is that phones in the gym are only being used for Creep Shots of women. Pretend to be taking a Selfie in the mirror, capture her in the reflection.

Now no-one is game to pull out a phone at all because they're worried of the implications of doing so, even for social photos of their friends.

All the gyms in my hometown have been Feminised and, as such, serve the current Female Hysteria of the time: there's Creep Alarms every few feet so girls can hammer it if they're getting 'unwanted' female attention or anyone grunts too loudly. It's amazing how quickly this has happened, but it doesn't surprise me, since the average Australian woman now resembles a mid-80's Bull Dyke. Haircuts like Pink's are - still! - hugely popular here.

There are no longer any Iron Gyms in town. One gym just expanded and now has an entire female-only gym on the upper floor. The downstairs gym is mixed, no private male gym allowed.

One of the Biker Clubs there had started letting me work out in their (private) gym just before I left. Seemed weird to be in a genuinely-male space with testosterone in the air.

[Leonard D Neubache]

(06-30-2016 09:33 AM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  

(06-30-2016 01:53 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

Sorry to be a wet blanket but nobody has any more right to destroy a drone that errantly enters their domain than they have to shoot down an airliner that briefly crosses their "airspace".

That's right. I can park my car on your front lawn and you have no legal right to destroy it, and if you do so then the court will waste no time ordering you to buy me a new car.

The difference being is that the government of every country grants a license to airliners to fly over peoples houses making it legal.

Drones are private property and as such can be considered a breach of privacy if it is used over peoples property. They can also be defined as surveillance equipment in the same league as CCTV cameras and are not allowed to simply 'fly over' a persons house or land.

They have arrested and charged police officers throughout the world for using cameras on helicopters to spy on people having sex and women sunbathing.

If you parked your car on my garden I will have it clamped and towed with the full backing of the law and it is up to the clampers on what you do next. Pretty sure it will be in excess of £300.

In Texas and other parts of the US I hope you wouldn't be that stupid less some guy with a shotgun comes out and welcomes you. Not only that I reckon they'd get some chains and drag your car to a ditch and phone the cops about a wreck they saw.

Discharging a firearm in public for any reason is an invitation to disaster. I'm not saying this because I'm some low-T cuck. I'm saying this because the police and the judiciary are now almost entirely low-T cucks and you may well be tossed in a cell with Bubba on trumped up charges of public endangerment.

I suppose we're all well aware that the agenda is what drives the justice system these days, not the letter of the law. What you get away with in Dallas you might not be so lucky with in Austin. And, yes, having someone's illegally parked car clamped and towed is a legal and wise way of dealing with the issue. Not as much fun as dragging the car onto a highway median and setting it on fire though.

So if you're desperate to destroy someones drone then I would highly suggest using nothing more radical than rat-shot rounds from a suppressed .22 semi auto.

[EDantes]

That thing looks like a gimmick; I doubt it will sell well.

Not to mention there are a lot of potential problems; such as what if the battery dies while its mid-air and it comes crashing down?