rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


Red Pill Catholicism
#1

Red Pill Catholicism

While reading Father Z's entertaining blog yesterday I came across an excellent post containing a lot of red pill truths. This is in relation to the vocations crisis the Church is facing but it but it applies to life beyond that.

The subject matter of the blog post is another article from Lifesite. Here's the relevant bit from the original:

Think. Open your eyes. Remember a little history. Men fight. Many of them really enjoy fighting with their fists, but many more enjoy the spirit of intellectual or spiritual combat for something to which they will devote their goods, their lives, and their sacred honor. So what have we done?

We have eliminated from most hymnals every single song that had anything to do with fighting the good fight. A boy may attend Mass for ten years and never hear one hymn that calls him to the soldiership of Christ.

Men are gamblers, for good and bad. Many of them court risk. They are the inventors of backgammon, cribbage, poker, “fantasy sports,” billiards, and chess. They are the ones who will risk ruining themselves for an idea or an invention. So what have we done?

We have lowered the stakes. If everyone is saved – though our Lord clearly warns us against that sluggish sureness – then why sweat? Where's the adventure? No real boy says, “I want to grow up to be a fat bishop sitting in the chancery while the real world goes on its merry way,” or, “I want to grow up to be a man without a wife and children, who spends his days being nice.” Is that it?

Men thrive in brotherhoods. Not peoplehoods, but specifically brotherhoods. See Tom Sawyer, Gilgamesh, the Germanic comitatus, the Japanese samurai, the monks of Saint Benedict, the fishermen of Newfoundland, the Plains Indians, the cristeros of Mexico, and, in a human sense, the apostles of our Lord Himself. So what have we done?

We have obliterated the brotherhoods. We got rid of most of our high schools for boys. We got rid of every one of our colleges for young men. We dissolved the brotherhood of acolytes – the altar boys. We did this at the worst imaginable time, just when everybody else was doing the same thing, so that now in most places CYO Basketball is but a memory, Boys' Clubs are Boys' and Girls' Clubs, which means Safe Small Children's Clubs, and the Boy Scouts have been sued clear to the precincts of Sodom.

Men understand authority and flourish in it. If you doubt this, you have never come near the locker room of a football team, nor have you troubled to consider whether that team could run a single play, let alone win a game, without strict adherence to a chain of command established for the common good. “I am a man under authority,” said the centurion to Jesus. He did not say, “I insist upon equality.” Men are the ones who invented orders. Lord Baden-Powell, the founder of the Scouts, understood the principle. What have we done?

We have obliterated distinctions between the clergy and the laity. We have turned a suspicious eye against the fundamental virtue of obedience, instead teaching that every man may do what appears right to him in his own mind.

Men are inspired by discipline. They are the ones who invented Boot Camp – and are disappointed now to find that it isn't any longer any great deal, not if you've been a wrestler or a football player in high school. Find out what the boy in the American prairies underwent to prove himself a man. What have we done?

We have eliminated almost every strenuous practice of self-denial from the common life of the Church. All we say is that if you are chewing gum during Mass, please to move it to the left side of your jaws so as to clear a space on the right to receive the Lord at Communion.

No ascetic life, no hierarchy, no brotherhood, no risk, no battle – no priests. And then there are the supernatural concerns, about which I will have more to say next time.


Father Z adds his own thoughts to the above among some of his gems:

I will now add to his point about serving Mass in corps of altar boys what I usually add when things liturgical come up: No initiative we undertake in the Church will succeed without a revitalization of our sacred worship.

We have to get all women and girls out of our sanctuaries and return to our Roman Church worship in our Roman, Latin Church parishes and chapels.

The above-mentioned Msgr. Schuler ran a parish famous for liturgical excellence and for sacred music. I mentioned the number of vocations. The door to the sacristy was open for young men to come in and don the cassock and serve. Boys, both from the K-12 school and from elsewhere, moved up year by year in the ranks, enrolling in the Archconfraternity of St. Stephen (the first chapter outside of England). Their tasks changed. The color of the medal cord changed. They taught the younger ones. The schola cantorum was open. The choir benches in the sanctuary were open to men when we sang Vespers on Sundays. The door of the rectory was open when seminarians and young men met. The priests acted like priests. The men saw the life. They were near the altar. They formed a corps and the corps formed them. Those who didn’t go into seminary wound up, usually, married and with great families.
Reply
#2

Red Pill Catholicism

I've been grappling with this subject for a year or so. God's Word is reality so the RP must be compatible with the Catholic Church, and indeed there are many signs that it was.
The trouble is, the CC has gotten very Beta in some areas and no one wants to follow a Beta's lead.
The male brotherhood concept is the key.
Reply
#3

Red Pill Catholicism

Gynocentrism conquered the church. Catholicism can't provide women to young men any longer. Birth control and abortion are the ruling orders.

I went to a Catholic HS. I have a lot of respect for traditionalism and orthodoxy. But when it's expected that our women will not be virgins at marriage, that divorce is now a standard accepted procedure and disciplined, hard working, dedicated men have nothing to gain from their efforts, is it any wonder the church would lax to accept everyone and everything just to get some bodies to show up?

Unfortunately, the Catholic church was attracting too many pedophiles as priests and this just made things worse. The Church is now incapable of elevating quality standards while increasing participation.
Reply
#4

Red Pill Catholicism

I also went to Catholic school (middle school though, not HS). I'm not up to date on modern history of the church but from what I've gathered the damage was done with Vatican II back in the 1960s.

“Nothing is more useful than to look upon the world as it really is.”
Reply
#5

Red Pill Catholicism

Though I don't currently consider myself a Catholic (albeit baptized and brought up as one), I have a bookshelf of "red-pill" Catholic books if anyone wants any recommendations. Though, a topic specific request would help that recommendation.

I can recommend Edward Feser's blog as a good jumping-off point, though be forewarned that he is a philosopher and so the blog generally revolves around that topic (which is one pillar of the religion).

Catholic philosophy underpins Catholic logicial justification for its ethics, which is important to be aware of when critiquing modernism's ethics justification over traditional ethics.

Feser also has a post or two wherein he lists his recommended books. Many of my books, but not all, came from that list. In general, his links section is also great.

http://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/

Here is a an interview of his on a pertinent topic:

Quote:Quote:

Scholasticism vs. Scientism: An Interview with Dr. Edward Feser

"This emphasis on linguistic precision and argumentative rigor differentiates Scholastic thinking from more literary and unsystematic approaches to philosophy and theology. It also makes Scholastic thought comparable in some respects to contemporary analytic philosophy. On the other hand, the emphasis on classical, and especially Aristotelian, metaphysical ideas differentiates Scholastic thinking from most contemporary philosophy".

Here's a short video that has Feser discussing philosophy's relation to theology in the Catholic Faith:






Gregory Hesse(.d) is one of my favorite authorities to hear speak. He has Doctorates in both Theology and Canon Law from the Angelicum, was ordained at Saint Peter's Basilica in Rome, and worked in the Vatican for a time. He's scary smart and also often drinks wine during interviews. Most memorable for me are his lessons on Catholic philosophy and Canon Law:




Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)