http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...child.html
http://kdvr.com/2016/07/27/man-forced-to...t-results/
Some gems out of this one.
So really its the milk train she is after.
There is no fraud protection against this kind of woman.
It would be unfair to have the biological father pay child support because he has his own family. So lets go after the money train and not feel bad about it.
Lucky for him the judge is an ass hole.
So for those of you who originally didn't want kids but now met "the one" this could happen to you. Those of you outside of the US this is our reality. He should be able to sue the state of Colorado and the "woman" for fraud and back child support for a child not his.
This reads like a "Protect your Ass from paternity fraud" article on ROK.
http://kdvr.com/2016/07/27/man-forced-to...t-results/
Some gems out of this one.
Quote:Quote:
He accused his ex-wife Lori Lonnquist of ignoring court custody orders that grant him visitation while still collecting child support.
When asked if she was being greedy, Lonnquist said, “Maybe, but I don’t feel bad about it, I really don’t.”
So really its the milk train she is after.
Quote:Quote:
Lonnquist said she would agree to stop collecting child support from Atkins if he would agree to terminate his parental rights.
Denver family law attorney Ron Litvak said Lonnquist’s suggestion is not a realistic option.
“It`s very rare that a court will ever allow someone to terminate their parental rights unless someone else is willing to step into that role. The courts are not usually going to do that," he said.
There is no fraud protection against this kind of woman.
Quote:Quote:
The most obvious “someone” would be Logan Doolen, the girl’s biological father. But the Aurora man said he has no intention of stepping to the plate.
Doolen said he feels bad for Atkins, but “on the flip side, if I would have to pay child support that would be messed up too."
Lonnquist said she doesn’t think it would be right for her to go after Doolen for child support.
“Because he has his own family, he has his own life. I don't think that's fair to come onto somebody when they didn't know for 11 years that they didn't have a kid and say 'Hey, by the way, you're going to pay child support for a kid that you didn't know was yours.'”
It would be unfair to have the biological father pay child support because he has his own family. So lets go after the money train and not feel bad about it.
Quote:Quote:
After Atkins learned the truth, he tried to submit the DNA test to an Arapahoe County judge, but the family law judge refused to accept the evidence because Atkins, who represented himself at the time, didn’t know the legal rules for submitting evidence.
When Atkins came back later with an attorney, his appeal was denied because the judge said he had already been given his opportunity to submit the DNA results.
“You know, I don’t want pity, I just want everybody to know this is happening. It’s not right, it is not right,” said a frustrated Atkins, who is now on the legal hook to keep paying child support until the girl turns 19.
Lucky for him the judge is an ass hole.
So for those of you who originally didn't want kids but now met "the one" this could happen to you. Those of you outside of the US this is our reality. He should be able to sue the state of Colorado and the "woman" for fraud and back child support for a child not his.
This reads like a "Protect your Ass from paternity fraud" article on ROK.