I'm almost certain this is a dupe.
Yeah the problem with these bunch is that they're atheist without substitution. If you're going to reject a religion and it's basic moral teachings, you need to have and understand of objective morals in its place. However for most of these types, they're simply too stupid or weak to understand the purpose of morals, let alone derive them themselves.
But aside from this, I think we're asking the wrong question. "Do you believe in god?" is not the root question. The root question is "what is the nature of religion?". Religion has a biological root (with sociology in between), not the other way around.
Quote: (01-24-2016 11:31 PM)Hades Wrote:
I don't like that atheism has been hijacked by poorly socialized childish men, liberal virtue signalers, ugly fat women, redditors, fedoras, etc; (go to any local Secular Student Alliance group and you'll see exactly what's up) but I don't consider myself religious in any sense.
Yeah the problem with these bunch is that they're atheist without substitution. If you're going to reject a religion and it's basic moral teachings, you need to have and understand of objective morals in its place. However for most of these types, they're simply too stupid or weak to understand the purpose of morals, let alone derive them themselves.
But aside from this, I think we're asking the wrong question. "Do you believe in god?" is not the root question. The root question is "what is the nature of religion?". Religion has a biological root (with sociology in between), not the other way around.