rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


R.I.P. London

R.I.P. London

Quote: (06-03-2018 04:50 AM)Constitution45 Wrote:  

Quote: (06-03-2018 02:27 AM)jordypip23 Wrote:  

I haven't been to London in many many years (I am from the USA). I was still a kid essentially the last time I was out there so this must have been the early 90's.

I totally understand the situation that is taking place over there. I do have a question for you UK natives, however. As someone that casually follows the industry of finance to some degree, I do understand that London still remains a global financial capital. It is up in there in a category of cities that includes very few other places (New York City, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Singapore, Shanghai, etc.). Are the folks in this type of business (and its ancillary businesses) representing an extremely small piece of the London pie? Surely they aren't among the crowd that desire the country to turn into a repressive, hardline Islamic regime, no?

I get it though. A slum in London actually seems worse than a mainstream decent area in Dubai (one of the less hardline actual Islamic rooted cities).

London is a very big city for starters, around 8 to 12 million, depends if you want to count the 'outer boroughs' suburban areas, but even then the population stats aren't really precise on the boundaries of the city.

The business types traditionally lived out of London and commuted in, or lived in the suburbs. This has changed slightly, as places like Brixton, Peckham etc, basically all of the rough ghetto areas have professionals living in them.

A lot of people argued that this made these areas particularly safer and 'trendy'. I'd agree that they are no longer no go areas like they used to, but crime is still very high in these areas. Council estates and gangs are embedded in the area and won't really go away. The professionals who live in these places are a transient population mostly, apart from the hardcore ones that have purchased properties for exuberant prices.

Usually you can tell a big difference between day and night. The professionals are mostly middle class left wingers, they are quite clueless to things, but usually they move out by the time they want children, because they realise that growing up in an area and living there are two different things.

Rich and poor mostly live on top of each other or on the same street. So there will be stabbings and murders on expensive residential streets, because a few roads away there is a notorious estate

Overwhelmingly though you will go through large swathes of London which frankly just look shit and run down. Council estates have been revamped and coloured up but when you go inside them, they are just the same.

The areas in London which are the worst, will be places like Croydon, Enfield, Newham, Haringey. The professionals are in very slim numbers there and they are just gone simply put. Watch 'streetblogs' on instagram to see what I mean and the mindset.

Central London will attract tourist related crime, there are a lot of prostitutes around Soho still. You do have gangs around London and elsewhere travelling in to commit crime in the centre.

Sounds kind of like New York / Manhattan in the 1980's when the crime rate was much higher.
Reply

R.I.P. London

Another sunny day in London.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...ement.html

I still don't know how to embed videos. Basically a man stabs a schoolboy and just sits waiting for police while tapping his knife. Pretty horrific.

I dont want to share news articles like this, but its important that all this stuff gets exposed and people see what is going on.
Reply

R.I.P. London

Quote: (06-08-2018 09:22 PM)jordypip23 Wrote:  

Quote: (06-03-2018 04:50 AM)Constitution45 Wrote:  

Quote: (06-03-2018 02:27 AM)jordypip23 Wrote:  

I haven't been to London in many many years (I am from the USA). I was still a kid essentially the last time I was out there so this must have been the early 90's.

I totally understand the situation that is taking place over there. I do have a question for you UK natives, however. As someone that casually follows the industry of finance to some degree, I do understand that London still remains a global financial capital. It is up in there in a category of cities that includes very few other places (New York City, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Singapore, Shanghai, etc.). Are the folks in this type of business (and its ancillary businesses) representing an extremely small piece of the London pie? Surely they aren't among the crowd that desire the country to turn into a repressive, hardline Islamic regime, no?

I get it though. A slum in London actually seems worse than a mainstream decent area in Dubai (one of the less hardline actual Islamic rooted cities).

London is a very big city for starters, around 8 to 12 million, depends if you want to count the 'outer boroughs' suburban areas, but even then the population stats aren't really precise on the boundaries of the city.

The business types traditionally lived out of London and commuted in, or lived in the suburbs. This has changed slightly, as places like Brixton, Peckham etc, basically all of the rough ghetto areas have professionals living in them.

A lot of people argued that this made these areas particularly safer and 'trendy'. I'd agree that they are no longer no go areas like they used to, but crime is still very high in these areas. Council estates and gangs are embedded in the area and won't really go away. The professionals who live in these places are a transient population mostly, apart from the hardcore ones that have purchased properties for exuberant prices.

Usually you can tell a big difference between day and night. The professionals are mostly middle class left wingers, they are quite clueless to things, but usually they move out by the time they want children, because they realise that growing up in an area and living there are two different things.

Rich and poor mostly live on top of each other or on the same street. So there will be stabbings and murders on expensive residential streets, because a few roads away there is a notorious estate

Overwhelmingly though you will go through large swathes of London which frankly just look shit and run down. Council estates have been revamped and coloured up but when you go inside them, they are just the same.

The areas in London which are the worst, will be places like Croydon, Enfield, Newham, Haringey. The professionals are in very slim numbers there and they are just gone simply put. Watch 'streetblogs' on instagram to see what I mean and the mindset.

Central London will attract tourist related crime, there are a lot of prostitutes around Soho still. You do have gangs around London and elsewhere travelling in to commit crime in the centre.

Sounds kind of like New York / Manhattan in the 1980's when the crime rate was much higher.

Yeah New York was on completely another level. However at the same time, The U.K is a small country. So when gangs move from the cities to outside, like they are doing now, it essentially swamps the country.

Shootings were actually a lot more common back in the late 90s and early 00s in London. Due to the opening up of the Eastern Bloc, however over time pro active operations started to restrict access to firearms.

Although I see these things a lot like a death by a thousand cuts. Over time a Western legal system or security infrastructure won't be able to cope with constant high levels of violent crime, like the in the video I showed before. Which plays into why resources and cuts have just demolished front line policing. Essentially the populace becomes accustomed to such violence, and then eventually the government just becomes accustomed to it because there isn't much of an outrage.

Which is where we are at now. I don't want to spread the fear at all, but it is quite significant, what is going on.
Reply

R.I.P. London

Quote: (06-09-2018 07:13 AM)Constitution45 Wrote:  

Another sunny day in London.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...ement.html

I still don't know how to embed videos. Basically a man stabs a schoolboy and just sits waiting for police while tapping his knife. Pretty horrific.

I dont want to share news articles like this, but its important that all this stuff gets exposed and people see what is going on.

African this time. Most of the crime explosion is connected either to Muslims or blacks - removing those two groups from the UK would let violent crime fall by 95%+ - some crimes would literally disappear overnight.






Here you see a good compilation of various documents and globalist plans on how to destroy the nation states - non-White mass migration was one of the tools applied. The single most dangerous thing to them would be a conventional as practiced for thousands of years nationalism that has ethnic roots. That is why Tommy Robinson is behind bars, because even despite him openly voicing civic nationalist roots, he would be waking up too many white people before they are wiped out completely.

When you type knife attacks in London you see dozens and dozens of videos. And it's funny how they claim that "teens" are doing it all. Yeah - never happened in the past for millennia, but it just happened to coincide with the mass-influx of non-Europeans in the last 25 years.

[Image: mayor-london-is-safest-city-in-the-world...035936.png]

I listened to an interview of a lady from North Dakota. Due to refugee settlement in one town - mostly from South America and Somalia, they had an uptick of 25% in crime within one bloody year!

Mind you that all those folk receive welfare, but who cares - they want to be millionaires with an IQ of 75.

[Image: londons-murder-rate-outpaces-new-york-ci...163359.png]

They seem to have knife-control marches. Afterwards it will be shiv-control marches. And then it will be straight male-control marches. No men allowed on the streets! Toxic masculinity is to be blamed.

But please let in another 500.000 violent enrichers - that is not related to the problem.
Reply

R.I.P. London

Quote: (06-09-2018 07:13 AM)Constitution45 Wrote:  

Another sunny day in London.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...ement.html

I still don't know how to embed videos. Basically a man stabs a schoolboy and just sits waiting for police while tapping his knife. Pretty horrific.

I dont want to share news articles like this, but its important that all this stuff gets exposed and people see what is going on.

Saw that recently. The guy in blue is behaving like you see in those death videos out of Africa. Same mannerisms and attitude and no repercussions except for a cushy time in UK prison.

Creeping death is all but assured in the UK.
Reply

R.I.P. London

Quote:Quote:

They seem to have knife-control marches.

Maybe England should bring back chain mail as a fashion statement.

If only you knew how bad things really are.
Reply

R.I.P. London

Quote: (06-09-2018 08:46 PM)RexImperator Wrote:  

Quote:Quote:

They seem to have knife-control marches.

Maybe England should bring back chain mail as a fashion statement.

I suggested this a while back and I wasn't kidding. Chainmail can be made at home, it's light and it'll do the job unless the thugs start using bows and arrows.

Maybe Youngblade and Sterling Archer need to move to the UK and start a feudal insurrection.

The public will judge a man by what he lifts, but those close to him will judge him by what he carries.
Reply

R.I.P. London

A famoust British comedian was robbed at knife-point by a moped gang. This sparked a media outcry.






Seriously - the idea that you can do anything while being on a moped is insane.

So what if they crash and die when the cops pursue them? They have to to change it or otherwise you can in theory dominate a city by thousands of moped gang members - just ride around constantly, kill, murder, plunder and rape at your heart's content. You are on a moped, so the cops can't do anything.

It's now 23.000 per year - most of them in London.

By the way - the cops are still doing their job to some degree or you would have Mogadishu circumstances happening in London. It's just that their hands are tied, they are not prosecuting the right kind of people and there are new units concerned mostly with hate-speech (aka telling the truth).
Reply

R.I.P. London

London is a maze compared to American cities. Not sure how many here who understand how British towns and cities, or indeed European cities are laid out but you can easily vanish and reappear elsewhere with ease on 2 wheels.

They are one of the biggest factors in crime in South America. The only thing to beat out the 'off-duty cop' meme is the moped killers/muggers. Very useful, mobile and fast enough to outrun victims and police.
Reply

R.I.P. London

< Nope - the moped crime exploded right after they banned pursuits. CCTV cameras and street barricades can make life very hard for those gangs. If the cops can ram them, block them, then it gets far more risky. In fact they banned this practice after some got killed and hurt.

Clearly it's a misguided policy. If it continues then you will have 100.000 attacks instead of 24.000. And what the fuck is that kind of excuse? Does that mean that Jiadis can drive around with baseball bats and smash heads in of people just because the cops cannot pursue?
Reply

R.I.P. London

It's stupid to telegraph that kind of weakness.

I'm against unnecessary politics force as much as anyone, but if you decide to enact a violent crime then it should be that you're assuming the risk of early death that comes with it.

As long as the cops don't use an vastly excessive level of force(e. g shooting a dude with a wiffle bat or something). or keep beating the guys ass after he's been subdued then anything else that happens during or after the crime is his own damn fault.
Reply

R.I.P. London

Quote: (06-11-2018 09:51 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

< Nope - the moped crime exploded right after they banned pursuits. CCTV cameras and street barricades can make life very hard for those gangs. If the cops can ram them, block them, then it gets far more risky. In fact they banned this practice after some got killed and hurt.

Clearly it's a misguided policy. If it continues then you will have 100.000 attacks instead of 24.000. And what the fuck is that kind of excuse? Does that mean that Jiadis can drive around with baseball bats and smash heads in of people just because the cops cannot pursue?

Nope. Wrong.

This isn't about banning persuits its all about man power, lack of justice, lack of resources to tackle them and being afraid if racism.

Saying the moped crime exploded overnight is denying the snowball effect it had. London is a gridlocked city and 2 wheels are superior to 4.

Dont believe me watch youtube or go there yourself. Dont tell me Im wrong when I've been watching it get worse over the years.
Reply

R.I.P. London

< There are plenty of resources to prosecute Twitter-hate-criminals, but none to come up with a good strategy of stopping moped acid crime gangs?

And I would not care if the cops go Judge Dredd on some of those shitstains. Cops can also saddle up on two bikes you know. And they have better equipment and better driving skill.

It was clearly the desire to stop those poor moped criminals getting hurt. Throwing hands up to the air and saying: "We cannot do anything about it." That is moronic. I don't believe this for one moment.

Even the bloody mainstream media cites this as one of the reasons:

https://news.sky.com/story/moped-crimina...s-10972558

Quote:Quote:

Moped criminals not being chased by police in case of accidents
Many officers worry they will not be supported by senior colleagues if someone is injured during a high-speed moped pursuit.

What if the poor boy gets hurt and then the Muslims and blacks riot?
Reply

R.I.P. London

Just like with graffitti, the solution to it being hard to catch perpetrators in the act is to bloody make an example of the few that you do catch.

Finally caught a guy spraying a pristine white wall with crap? Make him pick between paying 20x the value of repairs or 20 lashes.

Finally caught a moped-riding acid bomber? Make him pick between being sprayed with acid 5 times or a lethal injection.

"Imagine" by HCE | Hitler reacts to Battle of Montreal | An alternative use for squid that has never crossed your mind before
Reply

R.I.P. London

Now why would the English government want to oppress its newly-arrived doctors and engineers like that?

Clearly they were on their way home from experimenting at the lab and accidentally dropped the acid.
Reply

R.I.P. London

So essentially London imported folks that have no desire to assimilate, destroy the British traditions & way of life, and wreak havoc on the rest of the population......and they have little to nothing to contribute to the economy or society it seems as well...

This sound like a fair assessment?
Reply

R.I.P. London

Quote: (06-11-2018 10:12 PM)jordypip23 Wrote:  

So essentially London imported folks that have no desire to assimilate, destroy the British traditions & way of life, and wreak havoc on the rest of the population......and they have little to nothing to contribute to the economy or society it seems as well...

This sound like a fair assessment?

Yeah, but like, but um, but like, kebabs mate.
Reply

R.I.P. London

Oh that being the reason is a known fact. To be fair there are still alphas knocking about in the police CO19 and some of the specialist roles require higher levels of fitness and stamina that weed a lot of people out. Plus your tasking teams around London deal with the gangs probactively so theyre efficient and old school when it comes to dealing with them. But ultimately their teeth have been taken out and the criminals have protection from severe repercussions. Plus the senior management has been shaped by external types who I guess
Are picked because of their politics.
Reply

R.I.P. London

“Are picked because of their politics.”

Not sure if members outside the UK have heard of Common Purpose but it’s tentacles are everywhere.
Reply

R.I.P. London

Quote: (06-11-2018 09:51 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

< Nope - the moped crime exploded right after they banned pursuits. CCTV cameras and street barricades can make life very hard for those gangs. If the cops can ram them, block them, then it gets far more risky. In fact they banned this practice after some got killed and hurt.

Clearly it's a misguided policy. If it continues then you will have 100.000 attacks instead of 24.000. And what the fuck is that kind of excuse? Does that mean that Jiadis can drive around with baseball bats and smash heads in of people just because the cops cannot pursue?

This is absolutely the reason.

Banning 2-up riding on scooters would be a start; sadly it will impact many going about their general business but this whole situation is getting out of control.
Reply

R.I.P. London

Ya that would be just like the English. Address one of the symptoms rather than the root cause. Do you really think the cause of all this crime is that people are allowed to ride 2-up?

How's that knife and gun control going?
Reply

R.I.P. London

Ban of 2-up riding in some cities can only curb the problem if you the cops are allowed to chase runaways and put up barricades. Because otherwise - those buggers are not stopping to accept their ticket. So any ban would be useless without further enforcement. That's about as effective as the ban on carrying large knives, while those buggers drive around with drawn machetes.
Reply

R.I.P. London

Many cities in Colombia ban male passengers on motorbikes because of drive by shootings and robberies, they still happen but that’s probably because their cops suck so bad.
Reply

R.I.P. London

what's crazy is that part of the brexit plan includes new trade deals with india, which will most-likely allow Indians to travel to the UK very easily. I could see refugees going to India go get citizenship there and then moving to the UK legally with no problems at all. An interesting development
Reply

R.I.P. London

Quote: (06-12-2018 04:48 PM)droughtmeat Wrote:  

what's crazy is that part of the brexit plan includes new trade deals with india, which will most-likely allow Indians to travel to the UK very easily. I could see refugees going to India go get citizenship there and then moving to the UK legally with no problems at all. An interesting development

Refugees? That would be one development. Another is when 50 mio. Indians - especially the currently poor ones who move to the crazy Arabs for work - instead decide to "travel" to the UK. The only good thing about it is that the UK won't become Islamic - it will be just an Indian outpost.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)