[Soma]

7 day suspension to Flint for trolling across the forum. Likely suicide attempt.

[LeoneVolpe]

I believe this quote sums it up:

"A man can build a thousand bridges, but if he sucks one dick -- he's not a bridge builder, he's a dick sucker."

Straight men don't have sex with other men. Period.

[Days of Broken Arrows]

(06-26-2016 03:11 PM)Flint Wrote:  

Glad that Salon raised the issue. Don't know what all the commotion is about in this thread. The feminist-dominated elites are apparently against us and the decline of this society is imminent. Decadent Western women feed their egos on dating sites and no respectable male should pay attention to these overweight bitches. There has never been a worse time to be a straight (white) man. Men begin to wake up and realize that dating women increasingly becomes a bad deal in this age. They call it bro job. I call it rebellion. In many traditional cultures it's not considered homo to relieve yourself with not-too-hirsute companion as long as you remain the active part. (Meaning that you insert your erected phallus into someone else's anus.)

Just one tiny problem there. I mentioned this at the beginning of the thread, but it's worth repeating.

To "insert your erected (SIC) phallus" anywhere, it has to be erect. If a straight man is seeing another man naked that's not gonna happen. Hell, if a straight man even smells another man's cologne, things will wilt.

The only exception to this is when men become long-term prisoners. But seeing as how all of us here can roam free whenever we want, this ain't happening.

And if it's cultural (which I doubt), well, we're not from "other cultures," and have been raised in this one, where we get aroused at the opposite sex -- like 99 percent of other men.

I read somewhere Salon.com was having financial troubles. I really hope they go broke and have to close down. This article is one of the worst things I've ever read and shows how badly the Internet damaged journalism. Had I proposed a piece like this decades ago, I'd have been laughed out of the office by editors and told to write for an obscure indie journal. And keep in mind those editors were all liberals which, I guess, meant something different in 1994.

[AnonymousBosch]

(06-26-2016 07:39 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

To "insert your erected (SIC) phallus" anywhere, it has to be erect. If a straight man is seeing another man naked that's not gonna happen. Hell, if a straight man even smells another man's cologne, things will wilt.

Random situations in my life:

- A riding brother hugs me and slaps me on the back
- Naked in the gym showers with other muscular men
- In a rugby scrum pressed between other guys
- Lying on a bench press with the spotters crotch above my head
- Sharing a tent with a mate during fox culling

What Media 'Experts' and Academics would label these situations as:

Homoerotic

What they actually are:

Non-sexual

I'm not seeing a lot of wild boners appearing by anyone involved in these situations.

Remember: Degenerate people project their degeneracy on everyone else. They know nothing of the reality of the world, and their opinion should be discarded on any topic.

A gay guy I worked with, implying that we must all be bumming ourselves off in the showers after a game: "It must be so hot."

My reply? "To you."

On of my mates is a Tradie and has his mobile number on the side of his truck. Every two weeks or so, he gets some random guy ringing him offering to blow him. "It'll be the best head of your life", etc. They do this because they believe everyone is Secretly Gay and, to them, this is an entirely-rational thing to do, because Narcissists try to force everyone to accept their frame, however delusional.

He laughs this off with good humour, but one time he said "Why is it never a hot bird?"

[Leonard D Neubache]

^ Yet insist that every girls night out ends in a lesbian fuckfest and you'll be chastised as being a filthy ape.

I've known young women who injected imaginary sexual nonsense into every male/male relationship they ever witnessed no matter how banal. They were typically virgins and porn addicts.

[Alsos]

(06-26-2016 08:55 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

...I've known young women who injected imaginary sexual nonsense into every male/male relationship they ever witnessed no matter how banal...

You'll find this everywhere in science fiction/fantasy Fandom. The SF/F SJWs are obsessed with it.

Which makes me suspect that the phenomenon underlying things like the OP article is merely a sexual fantasy rather than a sociological reality. The women and gays pushing this notion that every male/male interaction is a prelude to or consummation of secret homosexual desire do so because it arouses them, not because there is any actual brokebackery going on. Amusingly, they're objectifying these straight men - turning them into sex objects by imagining them into fantasies that gratify their own desires and kinks regardless of whether the men in question have any interest in such things.

Note the potential for trolling feminists who indulge in this kind of projection, using their own arguments and language against them. "Gawd, Jynnyfyrr, you do realize you're objectifying Bob and John by turning their camping trip into a down-low gay fuckfest for your own erotic titillation, right? So sexist! I can't even."

Long/short: it's about them. Solipsism, as usual.

[LeoneVolpe]

(06-26-2016 09:41 PM)Alsos Wrote:  

(06-26-2016 08:55 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

...I've known young women who injected imaginary sexual nonsense into every male/male relationship they ever witnessed no matter how banal...

You'll find this everywhere in science fiction/fantasy Fandom. The SF/F SJWs are obsessed with it.

Which makes me suspect that the phenomenon underlying things like the OP article is merely a sexual fantasy rather than a sociological reality. The women and gays pushing this notion that every male/male interaction is a prelude to or consummation of secret homosexual desire do so because it arouses them, not because there is any actual brokebackery going on. Amusingly, they're objectifying these straight men - turning them into sex objects by imagining them into fantasies that gratify their own desires and kinks regardless of whether the men in question have any interest in such things.

Note the potential for trolling feminists who indulge in this kind of projection, using their own arguments and language against them. "Gawd, Jynnyfyrr, you do realize you're objectifying Bob and John by turning their camping trip into a down-low gay fuckfest for your own erotic titillation, right? So sexist! I can't even."

Long/short: it's about them. Solipsism, as usual.

Great points, Alsos. It reminds me of how SJWs took to Twitter and started clamoring for Marvel to make Captain America gay after "Captain America: Civil War" was released. It's like these people can't understand male friendships, or don't want to -- and prefer instead to project their own homosexual fantasies onto them.

Males can obviously enjoy the company of other males for camaraderie's sake and without sexual intent. If anything, the closeness in male friendships is something more akin to a familial/brotherly bond than anything remotely resembling romantic love or sexual lust. But, I guess you can't expect deviants to see the world through anything other than a demented filter.

[rpg]

(06-27-2016 08:39 PM)LeoneVolpe Wrote:  

(06-26-2016 09:41 PM)Alsos Wrote:  

(06-26-2016 08:55 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

...I've known young women who injected imaginary sexual nonsense into every male/male relationship they ever witnessed no matter how banal...

You'll find this everywhere in science fiction/fantasy Fandom. The SF/F SJWs are obsessed with it.

Which makes me suspect that the phenomenon underlying things like the OP article is merely a sexual fantasy rather than a sociological reality. The women and gays pushing this notion that every male/male interaction is a prelude to or consummation of secret homosexual desire do so because it arouses them, not because there is any actual brokebackery going on. Amusingly, they're objectifying these straight men - turning them into sex objects by imagining them into fantasies that gratify their own desires and kinks regardless of whether the men in question have any interest in such things.

Note the potential for trolling feminists who indulge in this kind of projection, using their own arguments and language against them. "Gawd, Jynnyfyrr, you do realize you're objectifying Bob and John by turning their camping trip into a down-low gay fuckfest for your own erotic titillation, right? So sexist! I can't even."

Long/short: it's about them. Solipsism, as usual.

Great points, Alsos. It reminds me of how SJWs took to Twitter and started clamoring for Marvel to make Captain America gay after "Captain America: Civil War" was released. It's like these people can't understand male friendships, or don't want to -- and prefer instead to project their own homosexual fantasies onto them.

Males can obviously enjoy the company of other males for camaraderie's sake and without sexual intent. If anything, the closeness in male friendships is something more akin to a familial/brotherly bond than anything remotely resembling romantic love or sexual lust. But, I guess you can't expect deviants to see the world through anything other than a demented filter.

When I was a kid I always thought Batman and Robin should run a train on Batgirl. She was so hot in that purple costume.

[Leonard D Neubache]

(06-27-2016 08:39 PM)LeoneVolpe Wrote:  

...
Great points, Alsos. It reminds me of how SJWs took to Twitter and started clamoring for Marvel to make Captain America gay after "Captain America: Civil War" was released. It's like these people can't understand male friendships, or don't want to -- and prefer instead to project their own homosexual fantasies onto them.

Males can obviously enjoy the company of other males for camaraderie's sake and without sexual intent. If anything, the closeness in male friendships is something more akin to a familial/brotherly bond than anything remotely resembling romantic love or sexual lust. But, I guess you can't expect deviants to see the world through anything other than a demented filter.

You'll likely find that people with these sort of delusions, whether they be male or female, don't have even one, solitary true friend in the whole world.

All it takes to understand sexless human bonding is to have one person in your life, even for a short while, who you know has you back no questions asked. The "everyone is gay" crowd are likely comprised mostly of latchkey kids with no brothers or sisters, who never fit in enough to win the loyalty of another human being.

[Alsos]

(06-27-2016 10:01 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(06-27-2016 08:39 PM)LeoneVolpe Wrote:  

...
Great points, Alsos. It reminds me of how SJWs took to Twitter and started clamoring for Marvel to make Captain America gay after "Captain America: Civil War" was released. It's like these people can't understand male friendships, or don't want to -- and prefer instead to project their own homosexual fantasies onto them.

Males can obviously enjoy the company of other males for camaraderie's sake and without sexual intent. If anything, the closeness in male friendships is something more akin to a familial/brotherly bond than anything remotely resembling romantic love or sexual lust. But, I guess you can't expect deviants to see the world through anything other than a demented filter.

You'll likely find that people with these sort of delusions, whether they be male or female, don't have even one, solitary true friend in the whole world.

All it takes to understand sexless human bonding is to have one person in your life, even for a short while, who you know has you back no questions asked. The "everyone is gay" crowd are likely comprised mostly of latchkey kids with no brothers or sisters, who never fit in enough to win the loyalty of another human being.

Good points from both of you. In some cases, they're just acting out resentment towards other men for having close, brotherly relationships that they lack or are incapable of. They attempt to shame other men into avoiding those normal associations by creating suspicion that such things are actually gay relationships.

Which is hilariously hypocritical.

[joost]

It's not called bro job. It's called gay-for-pay. Most porn actresses do that. Some male actors do that too. Don't know how often since I don't like to watch naked men. Famous actor Peter North did one or some gay scenes when he started.

[RatInTheWoods]

I saw a dude wearing a t-Shirt that said:

I'm not gay, but $20 is $20.

[username]

(06-28-2016 05:18 AM)RatInTheWoods Wrote:  

I saw a dude wearing a t-Shirt that said:

I'm not gay, but $20 is $20.

Was he from India?

[Ibagemyoutagem]

I got to admit, Im actually tired of articles like this and thankfully I don't have to deal with it anymore. I remember back in america just a little over a month ago articles like this use to get me and was interesting because it was really going on in my environment. The typical american environment is that everything goes if even if it means going backwards .
I think even this article given me appreciation for SEA for the fact that women mostly grow into loyal wives or are never married period. This is the culture , women learn to cook, clean, and try not piss off a guy with useless shit test, A culture that's moving forward and hopefully last.

[DJ-Matt]

Legendary:

(02-01-2014 02:15 AM)commiejoe Wrote:  

Well.... ummm...
Gay guys give really good blowjobs. Really good, cause they know what other guys like, obviously.
They will pay you, to let them blow you.
75 bucks, go in the bathroom, and if you throatfuck them hardcore style they'll give you more money.
Then go back out to the dance floor and use the post orgasm high to pick up chicks with ease. Less pressure, and more casual after emptying the balls.

That's what I learned in my college days, circa '00-'04. Not sure if it's going on these days.

edit: Thinking back on it, maybe those were beta gay guys, so lonely that they would pay to get a taste of dick on their tongues.

(02-01-2014 05:05 AM)commiejoe Wrote:  

Yeah, I didn't see any harm in it, luckily didn't catch any diseases from it.

Just some crazy shit from the wild days.