rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


What EXACTLY constitutes a woman being a 8-10?
#76

What EXACTLY constitutes a woman being a 8-10?

Quote: (06-17-2015 10:38 AM)RedPillUK Wrote:  

She probably just isn't athletic, only skinny, thats why she has legs like that.

I will take the bait here.

For me my scale is very simple.
Only blonde white girls can be 10s.
Very attractive white girls can be 9s. Blondes, brunettes, redheads
I've never seen a black, asian or latina girl go into the 9 category. I think the sexiest ones are 8s.

Nothing stops a Latin girl from being white and blonde. [Image: wink.gif]

Oh yes, I'm so privileged you literally can't even.
Interested in joining the FFL? I tried (and failed).
Reply
#77

What EXACTLY constitutes a woman being a 8-10?

10's are women that you wouldn't change a thing physically on them. Everything is the way you want it.

I think there are at least 1,750,000 10's in the world. 3,500,000,000.00 women in the world, 10% are hot, leaving 350,000,000 women, of which 1% are 10's, leaving 1,750,000 10's.

That's a shit load. Abundance mentality friends.
Reply
#78

What EXACTLY constitutes a woman being a 8-10?

For me, a 10 is a beautiful face, good proportions; a 10 is European/Caucasian (Italians included, Spanish girls don't make it to 10) or Lebanese. I like taller (5' 7" - 5' 11"), small tits, a smaller ass (both must be exquisitely and precisely shaped and defined), almost always blonde, but redhead or brunette on occasion. Normally dresses very well, good shoes, well spoken (no foreign accents, save British-London area, or very light Oceania/South Africa), no visible tattoos, no piercings except on lobes (nipples are okay).

Behavior is important too. Doesn't drink heavily (no heavy intoxication), doesn't smoke (monthly cigarette/joint ok), doesn't party super hard, isn't a moron. Some criteria open to interpretation on a case-by-case basis. A 10 is generally the ideal wife material as well.

Example of a 10:

Margot Robbie

[Image: margot-robbie-david-sharpener-photoshoot...zaar_9.jpg]

[Image: tumblr_no2k2hOELf1tp3ho4o2_500.png]

Emma Watson

[Image: tumblr_nq726uqx7S1s9f17oo1_500.png]

[Image: tumblr_nq7qsgPMWj1sjvvwbo1_500.png]
Reply
#79

What EXACTLY constitutes a woman being a 8-10?

I think white girls are the prettiest. I like light eyes, redheads, blondes, fair skin. Of course beauty is in the eye of the beholder (culturally determined.)

White women deteriorate pretty quickly. After the first kid (or after 30) most of m start looking like crap. They can age so fast. In less than 5 years from a 9 to a low 6.
Especially their skin gets dull (maybe because of the overabundance of tanning), caucasians get gray hair the earliest, thinner skin (natures way to get sunlight efficiently) also means faster development of crowsfeet with women (who have even a thinner skin than white men)

What is a 10? There is no ten. Perfection doesn't exist. But 9's exist.
Maybe we should use a more simple ranging table: ugly (1-5.5), doable (5.5-6.9), pretty (7), gorgeous. (8-9)
Reply
#80

What EXACTLY constitutes a woman being a 8-10?

Like with most things observed in nature, if you take a big sample, it will follow normal distribution. Female "beauty" is no exception. On both ends of the scale, you'll have few beautiful and few ugly faces and bodies. The distribution will fall, pretty much, within three sigma rule of thumb. That is, about 68% of females would fall within one standard deviation from the average (mean) and about 95% within two standard deviations from the average. How does that convert to the arbitrary, non-scientific, ordinal scale ranking commonly used?

I can't really tell. You'd say, aha! You're non-the-wiser. Yet, I'll try.

A very rough rule of thumb, if so-called girl with assigned attractiveness of "5" would be equal to average, then within one standard deviation we could include "3", "4", "6", and "7", meaning 68%, that is 2/3 of females are in this category of attractiveness. Let's add "2" and "8" to fall within two standard deviations, that is 95% of females would encompass rank from "2" up to "8". Thus, "0", "1", "9" and "10" would constitute about no more than 5% of the females. Since we're not interested in the "0" and "1", then we'd have 2.5% of the female population in the rank of "9" and "10", that is some 2.5 out of 100, randomly sampled females from a given population would be of that standard of attractiveness - in common speak - they would be "hot".

Now, this is very non-scientific, and one can create those scales with different numerical values (any n point scale you wish to come with, be it an ordinal, fractional or what-have-you scale ad libitum. The 10 point scale just happens to be a useful heuristic which allows men to exchange suboptimal information about how attractive female in question is. If you tell me she was a "7", I will (probably) get the idea what you mean and vice-versa.

Nevertheless, majority of heterosexual males have neurobiologically evolved, thus hard-wired well-working system in the brain for assessment of females' reproductive fitness (that is, beauty). Essentially, it's a multifactor system, where not only visual cues but also auditory, olfactory, tactile, and sociocultural cues are at play for us to make a decision whom we deem attractive. Consider major histocompatibility complex. Roughly speaking, the less similar immune system of a potential mating partner, according to some scientific research, the more probable it is your brain will assess him/her as a better potential mating partner, for the offspring will benefit from even better immune system and, in consequence, from a greater chance for survival and reproduction. To summarise there is much more to beauty than meets the eye.

So, is there a "perfect 10"? The answer is "yes" and "no". We can agree upon objective measures, but the subjective are valuator dependent. Thus, it will always be, to a certain degree, to a question "Was she hot?", an answer "Well, it depends whom you ask".

For the curious, here's an article from the Wall Street Journal about the bell curve and attractiveness: The average woman has average looks.

____________________

My Adventures in Game updates on the go: twits by Max Detrick

Unbowed. Unbent. Unbroken.

I don’t ever give up. I mean, I’d have to be dead or completely incapacitated.
-- Elon Musk
Reply
#81

What EXACTLY constitutes a woman being a 8-10?

Why wouldn't the 10s be subject to Power Law instead of Normal/Gaussian distribution?

After all, no real 10 has normal curves.

For every 1000 7s you see out there are 100 8s. And 10 9s. And 1 10. Of course, which girl is the 10 is subjective to the viewer, do you prefer Kim Kardashian, Sasha Grey, Taylor Swift, Eva Mendes, or Scarlett Johannson...
Reply
#82

What EXACTLY constitutes a woman being a 8-10?

With regards to race, white women would be on top in numbers and percent in the US. The standard beauty in the US is white, so white women are going to fit the ideal look then other minorities and the fact that majority of the population is white, so mathematically there is going to be more white women who are 8-10. Same thing with Europe too.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)