rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


The Scale of Fuckability
#1

The Scale of Fuckability

Forgive me if something similar has been proposed before.

I think that there needs to be a scale to describe bangability that is deeper than the binary WB/WNB method. We all know there is a spectrum within the WB chicks. This scale is an attempt to quantify that.

F1-would not bang, ever
F2-would only bang if drunk/novelty sake, no repeats
F3-would bang but not invest much time/money/energy, probably no repeats
F4-would bang and put some work towards it, would repeat
F5-would bang by any means necessary and definitely repeat

I think this is a good way of describing how you value a chick sexually.
Reply
#2

The Scale of Fuckability

[Image: smiley_beat_dead_horse2.gif]

"Money over bitches, nigga stick to the script." - Jay-Z
They gonna love me for my ambition.
Reply
#3

The Scale of Fuckability

There is also a "how low would you go" sort of thread but

[Image: thumb_thisthreadisworthlesswithoutp.gif]

"Go be fat on someone else's time."
Reply
#4

The Scale of Fuckability

Isn't the 1-10 scale a "scale of fuckability"?

I mean, no one ever says "She's a 2 but I'd fuck her brains out and brag about it to all my friends."
Reply
#5

The Scale of Fuckability

[Image: Indiana_Jones_-_In_Before_The_Lock.gif]
Reply
#6

The Scale of Fuckability

Useless thread. Might as well discuss what we wouldn't not bang:

[Image: tumblr_nm7uwcnXPs1sgocgjo7_400.jpg]

WB automatically, rawdog, my penis' homing beacon would alert and enter in an automated, instinctual fashion.
Reply
#7

The Scale of Fuckability

This is actually useful. WB means nothing .. There are girls I'd bang once while drunk and there are girls I'd invest a ton of time and energy into seducing so I could fuck them again and again.
Reply
#8

The Scale of Fuckability

I say again:

Quote: (06-17-2015 03:24 PM)Aenigmarius Wrote:  

Isn't the 1-10 scale a "scale of fuckability"?

I mean, no one ever says "She's a 2 but I'd fuck her brains out and brag about it to all my friends."
Reply
#9

The Scale of Fuckability

Quote: (06-22-2015 10:34 AM)Aenigmarius Wrote:  

I say again:

Quote: (06-17-2015 03:24 PM)Aenigmarius Wrote:  

Isn't the 1-10 scale a "scale of fuckability"?

I mean, no one ever says "She's a 2 but I'd fuck her brains out and brag about it to all my friends."

Not necessarily, but there might be a slight correlation.

The fuckability scale is more a subjective measure of a woman's sexual worth. That is, how much she is worth TO YOU.

For example, lets take a girl who is a 5 on a 1-10 scale. For a seasoned player who regularly beds 7-8s, he might rate her a F2 (novelty fuck). But some other less-experienced guy might rate her as a F4 (put in effort).

A woman's fuckability can also decrease over time. You might meet a hottie and rate her as a F5 (do anything to bang) You bang a couple times and turns out she is shitty in bed, doesn't give head, and always gives LMR. She then might drop down to a F3 (only bang if convenient)

Another example is if a girl plays up to your preferences. For guys who like younger chicks, a plain-looking 18yr old (5/10) might be a F5, while a "hot" (8/10) 27yr old may rank lower.

The 1-10 scale is objective, a number calculated by your brain. The F1-F5 scale is more like an advanced boner test.
Reply
#10

The Scale of Fuckability

Quote: (06-20-2015 12:32 AM)CaracaoSteel Wrote:  

[Image: tumblr_nm7uwcnXPs1sgocgjo7_400.jpg]

New shoot! It's funny, there's like every other girl on the planet who you can see naked a few times and then like "another artsy black and white nip slip? Wake me up when she does double anal." And then there's Emily Ratjakowski, my nominee for hottest bitch in the place.

Otherwise yeah OP, [Image: smiley_beat_dead_horse2.gif]
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)