Quote: (06-01-2015 11:33 PM)LINUX Wrote:
Asking a woman how many men she has fucked is a sign of jealousy and self-esteem issues
What about when you
don't ask (which is 100 percent of the time for me) and they still talk about this shit like it's something to brag about? Sometimes it's directly to you, but often it's just in your proximity (in person or virtual). I'm not seeing a lot of guys in this thread who went out of their way to seek this information.
You're not understanding that part of the revulsion is precisely with the brazenness these women display in announcing this information
unsolicited. I've had run-ins with girls who had public blogs--with their fucking head shot and name proudly displayed front-and-center--about, for example, performing acts on dudes that most guys on this forum wouldn't permit on themselves.
Quote: (06-01-2015 11:33 PM)LINUX Wrote:
When you're fucking a lot of women, finding a woman who likes to fuck and knows how to fuck is of the greatest assets to have and guys who get constant lays all have something they have in common; they rarely bitch about how many men a woman has been with.
Forget the double standards and resume shit and go out there and enjoy life. Or someone else will.
What about when you've plowed through a shitload of these women who "who like to fuck" and you'd like a girl who maybe "knows how to fuck" a little less, but knows how to play the cello, cook for you, maybe entertain you a little (with not her pussy), and who maybe you can bring around to meet some of the important people in your life--who would be equally, if not more, disgusted by her "700 college stories" because they're from a generation where people had the decency to get gang-banged in private, or by only half the football team?
You're creating a straw-man argument here, like guys in this thread have expressed (or even hinted at) crippling insecurity about how many guys their "girlfriends" have fucked. Quite the contrary, guys are disgusted so much with what a growing number of these girls are capable of,
they can hardly countenance doing anything more than what we're already doing--"enjoying life," as you put it, by treating these women like the disposable urinal cakes that a growing number of them are willingly (even enthusiastically) becoming. I don't consider those women "great assets." I consider them low-value, transient, and usually damaged emotionally.
Being around these women isn't harmless. After a while, you start to get infected by same after-sex empty feeling these women must experience on a daily basis. Not just that, many of them have psychiatric problems that pose all-too-real legal and physical danger to you.
No girl is an angel, but I don't want have to explain to my son that he would have 3 different brothers or sisters--from different dads--if mom had grown up in an era when "a woman's right to choose" wasn't legal.
All the nuclear sluts in this thread contribute to a race to the bottom for
all women, even the "nicer" ones who actually put a smile on your face when you see her name pop up on your phone.
Your life-affirming platitudes have their place, but cynically using them to imply that you're more well-adjusted, have better game, or are morally superior to other guys--who
aren't willing to accept just whatever's given to them in the name of enjoying life--is both self-serving and intellectually dishonest. You're making the argument that women make--it's men's "insecurity," not their slutty behavior, that's the problem. The worst part is that guys in this thread aren't even engaging in the behavior you're so eager to shame. Show us all the many posts where guys are admitting to asking women how many men they've banged, or confessing to not enjoying life because they hold the women in their lives to a higher sexual standard.
Because for women, basically the only limiting factor to having sex is a measure of self-restraint. That's not the case for 99% of men. So, yes, the standards are different.