Quote: (04-17-2015 05:16 PM)Hades Wrote:
Feminists must be blind and socially retarded to not see that this is a compliment directed towards a woman with a firm and shapely ass.
I think this is an aspect of this topic that we have a tendency to neglect. We may be giving too much credit to some of the people making these inane SJW arguments. Many of them may not actually have a coordinated plan or any decent understanding of the impact their actions might have on other people. Rather, some of these people probably really are just socially and romantically retarded. That's it - they make the inane arguments they do because they just lack the basic interpersonal intelligence necessary to see where they go wrong, and they don't have enough romantic experience/intuition to really understand how contrary their views are to normal human sexual relations.
We've already seen photos of some of the people making these comments:
Quote: (04-17-2015 05:18 PM)Horus Wrote:
Here's a clue to answer that question. This is from the Twitter account of the broad who said "You made sure to get her permission before posting, right? And that she's not a minor? Way to keep it classy." And she's from Toronto.
![[Image: 2s9t3xt.jpg]](http://oi60.tinypic.com/2s9t3xt.jpg)
What are the chances that this person simply hasn't had a lot of experience with normal people in the context of normal romantic interactions? What are the odds that she just hasn't been socialized well enough to understand the nuances of normal, healthy human sexual relationships and interaction? What if she isn't self-aware enough to realize this (probably the only thing that would allow her to make valid observations absent good socialization)?
She may have had plenty of sex with more than one boyfriend, but if those boyfriends and all those she interacted with were similarly disconnected from reality/poorly socialized, then that makes no difference - her poor socialization would only have been reinforced by her exclusive association with other poorly socialized people, and she'd still never have understood what constitutes normal, healthy socialization.
If all of the above is accurate in the case of this woman and those making similar critiques, then would you be at all surprised that such an individual could come out with an argument that stands so contrary to fundamental romantic realities?
Think about it. What else would they do? How can you make a critique in line with normal human socialization when you've never been socialized well? When you've been blinded from the start, how can you be expected to see properly later on?
I suspect that the issue we're dealing with here regarding these people is one that runs deeper than we think.