Quote: (04-08-2015 11:14 AM)Samseau Wrote:
I am serious: you guys are out to lunch. If not for the threat of force why would anyone obey the law? The laws are shit, no one would follow them.
By the way, on Cops episodes, they often resort to shooting at fleeing suspects. That's why the show got such high ratings because people love violence.
Seeing as how the Tennessee v. Garner ruling came down in 1985 and prohibited cops from shooting fleeing felons except under very limited circumstances, I highly doubt what you say is accurate here. I'm not some expert on the show and I've only seen a handful of episodes, but that sounds too outrageous to be true.
Quote:Quote:
"FREEZE OR I'LL SHOOT!" And they point the gun at them. Pretty routine, not sure what America you're living in.
Cops no longer say that.
Quote:Quote:
Personally I'm with other guys who say they need more effective long-range stun guns to subdue suspects, but they don't have that right now not to mention these "non-lethal" weapons are probably proven to get more cops killed which is why they don't use them often.
The current PR spin is that "This cop shouldn't have fired, etc. etc." but in truth this guy was following orders, just like all the other cops who shoot down unarmed people everyday. The cops do their best to maintain order by making this cop out to be the bad guy when in fact the cops are just doing their jobs.
On the contrary, tasers have probably saved the lives of thousands of people cops would've shot in the past before their widespread usage.
Furthermore, there is not a single department in the country where cops are officially taught to shoot a fleeing unarmed man in the back. So the "just following orders" defense does not hold up.
Quote:Quote:
I think the likelihood is extremely high the cop will walk free, but he will lose his job. The reason he will not be convicted: who is going to work as a police officer if your orders get you thrown in jail? No one. Sending this cop to prison will weaken police forces in the area if not the nation. Weaker police forces = weaker control for America's plutocracy. America's plutocracy cannot stomach anything less than complete control, so they know they need to keep protections for the Cops or else no one will become a hired goon (I mean Cop) for them.
Maybe he will walk free, but he needs to be put on trial for this.
Quote:Quote:
If the cop is arrested and sent to prison, then fewer cops will do their job and fewer recruits will sign up to be a cop. Crime then increases. The people are victimized. Eventually the politicians in power are thrown out and America's plutocracy loses money, which spurs action. Guys like Rudy Giuliani are given all the money they need to win an election and reinstitute a strong police force with huge unconstitutional protections to shoot down anyone they please plus stuff like "stop and frisk." Order is then restored, and then people who run away from cops are gunned down again. The people feel safe again and America's plutocrats may resume plundering the nation without worrying about pesky elections.
Given how egregious this incident is, if it causes someone not to become a cop..GOOD! They likely had bad motives to become a cop in the first place.
Quote:Quote:
If anyone would like to correct me they are more than welcome to but from everything I've seen and presented over my lifetime indicates the above is the truth.
You might see it as true, but I think you make plenty of hand-wringing assumptions that are unfounded.
"Men willingly believe what they wish." - Julius Caesar, De Bello Gallico, Book III, Ch. 18