[Handsome Creepy Eel]

I especially like the fact that he calls out the so-called "alt-right" for their unexcusable cucking against Roosh and other nonwhite or non-race-obsessed bloggers. Some of us might like or not like Heartiste, but no one can deny that his heart is in the right place.

[Blaster]

(02-09-2016 02:29 AM)CH-Toronto Wrote:  

I stumbled upon this- and for someone who hates Roosh, he does a good job of defending him. Although he fucks up on a few points near the end at 16:00 (and throughout)- but he gets his point across better than any media outlet attempted.

Yeah his flaw there is assuming that his experience with Mystery's fans and other Pickup Artists gives him the ability to predict what Roosh fans will be like.

[RaccoonFace]

(02-09-2016 02:17 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

(02-09-2016 08:48 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 05:05 PM)Lucky Wrote:  

From the writer who doesn't lift:

http://www.washingtonian.com/2016/02/08/...erence-dc/

Does this part make sense to anyone

Quote:

Even if Obama’s professed exploits have been on the right side of the law, they do not, as Vox pointed out last week, comport to most people’s definition of rape. (The FBI defines it as “penetration, no matter how slight” without consent.)

This roughly translates to "Even if what he did was legal, most people would say it was legal."

The sentence structure just seems completely fucked up. Usually if you say "Even if X" you follow it with something that challenges X to support your point.

Obfuscation, shit writing.

Edit: This is the dude



The reason he writes so poorly is that he has a flimsy genetic constitution. His cranial proportions show signs of fetal alcohol spectrum.

He might write poorly because he has genetic defects, but I suspect his extreme tendencies for lies and deceit comes from his Talmudic upbringing.

So I guess after losing the precious Gollum had to go out and get a regular job.

Underrated post.

[porscheguy]

(02-09-2016 02:17 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

(02-09-2016 08:48 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(02-08-2016 05:05 PM)Lucky Wrote:  

From the writer who doesn't lift:

http://www.washingtonian.com/2016/02/08/...erence-dc/

Does this part make sense to anyone

Quote:

Even if Obama’s professed exploits have been on the right side of the law, they do not, as Vox pointed out last week, comport to most people’s definition of rape. (The FBI defines it as “penetration, no matter how slight” without consent.)

This roughly translates to "Even if what he did was legal, most people would say it was legal."

The sentence structure just seems completely fucked up. Usually if you say "Even if X" you follow it with something that challenges X to support your point.

Obfuscation, shit writing.

Edit: This is the dude



The reason he writes so poorly is that he has a flimsy genetic constitution. His cranial proportions show signs of fetal alcohol spectrum.

He might write poorly because he has genetic defects, but I suspect his extreme tendencies for lies and deceit comes from his Talmudic upbringing.

So I guess after losing the precious Gollum had to go out and get a regular job.

Where's his neck?

[Lucky]

To deal with twitter trolls I've been copy/pasting the worst parts of this wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Fish

[MiscBrah]

Benjamin Freed looks the type of guy who would ask redditors and 4chan members to rate his face.

[Silver_Tube]

This was really entertaining. Roosh has gotten less stuttery in his speaking since his talk in DC, then again the DC topic was more emotional and a more challenging thing to deliver.

I saw a little bit of this flare up on my facebook but didn't get involved.

I really want to see everyone again, ugh.

[Stimulus]

Finally had some time to watch the complete video and I'll be watching it again and again from time to time.

This was one hell of a display of masculanity. No excuses, no hiding and not playing the 'typical' role of being the 'victim' of all the fuss in this situation as 99% of other people would have done. Standing your ground when it comes to your beliefs, articles, visions, etc, and most important, your dignity.

I can only say I have the utmost respect for how Roosh handled this. While being ripped to shreds in the (social)media he called them out on a briliant way, took it like a man and destroyed them with plain simple, yet strong and true, arguments while even being able of throwing in some jokes and laughs.

I can only hope that by working very hard on myself, I'll someday be able to come even close to the level of communication (body/mind/voice) he displayed right there.

Roosh, like many others have said, you should sticky that vid. and use it at every article, website or whatever it might even be relevant to.

[JuiceDC]

(02-09-2016 02:29 AM)CH-Toronto Wrote:  

I stumbled upon this- and for someone who hates Roosh, he does a good job of defending him. Although he fucks up on a few points near the end at 16:00 (and throughout)- but he gets his point across better than any media outlet attempted.

Well said! I believe this neckbeard can actually can be saved! Just one good time getting cheated on would probably be enough to do it.

[Requiem]

More support for Roosh from the Alt-Right:

http://www.thisblogisdangerous.com/retur...itch-hunt/

"Neither Return of Kings nor Roosh advocate for rape, but it is a convenient hook for the media to hang their hat and whip up a hysterical mob of proles who lack the critical thinking to see what Return of Kings is really about. Proles don’t want to be educated about the modern world’s broken society and they don’t want to listen to reason. They want emotional knee-jerk reactions to whoever is the latest figure of hate. "

"Return of Kings’ real crime is not advocating rape but challenging the prevailing leftist orthodoxy. They do it in an irreverent and sometimes crude manner but it works and they have brought a lot of men towards Traditionalist thinking. It was for this reason I was hoping to attend one of these meetings and encouraged others to do so."

"A lot of the growing alternative right blogosphere grew up reading the likes of Roosh and Heartiste."

"The media have revealed themselves to be wholly unburdened by truth or conscience and interested only in pushing the progressive dogma and hiding the full extent of the decline. Anonymous doxxed Roosh and left him and his family vulnerable to violence."

"The Reactionary suggests the modern world is the problem and that barbarian incursions are merely the consequence of a soft and dying culture which has forgotten its roots. Modernism is characterised by the idea that our ancestors who survived and overcame thousands of years of war, plague and famine were ignorant bigots. Reaction is the humble idea that they might have been right all along."

"Look at some of the writers on there: Brother Aurelius, a Catholic monk who has taken a vow of celibacy. Michael Sebastian, a trad Catholic husband and father. Orthodox Christian Reactionary Mark Citadel. Quintus Curtius who shines a light on wisdom from classical literature. The writers at Return of Kings are far more conservative than some of the ‘conservative’ pundits attacking them."

[BortimusPrime]

Funny how the moderate free speech people who are defending Roosh still feel the need to virtue signal about how much they personally found the article distasteful in order to make sure no one thinks they might be a rape apologist.

You see the same thing when they're defending porn that feminists hate: "Now I personally don't like the idea of a midget shitting into a bound woman's open mouth while she's milked like a cow by a Japanese man in a gimp suit, although I did watch the entire video, but I'll defend their freedom of expression none the less!"

[MdWanderer]

(02-09-2016 10:12 PM)MiscBrah Wrote:  

Benjamin Freed looks the type of guy who would ask redditors and 4chan members to rate his face.

Not a smart move on his part unless he wants to get his feelings hurt.

[Aurini]

(02-10-2016 03:07 PM)BortimusPrime Wrote:  

Funny how the moderate free speech people who are defending Roosh still feel the need to virtue signal about how much they personally found the article distasteful in order to make sure no one thinks they might be a rape apologist.

You see the same thing when they're defending porn that feminists hate: "Now I personally don't like the idea of a midget shitting into a bound woman's open mouth while she's milked like a cow by a Japanese man in a gimp suit, although I did watch the entire video, but I'll defend their freedom of expression none the less!"

I, for one, am taking note of these callow allies.

[lamudbug]

Alright just found article about Roosh on facebook. It is disgusting how these people are such sheeple. No actual individual thought. No one watching the video or reading the article. They all just assume its true and tell what they would do to him. This country really is a bunch of morons. At a loss for words.

[Kingsley Davis]

Female caller referenced Roosh's groundbreaking article.