Great idea for a thread! A few notes:
1). Women's names give away their ages. They can try to lie, but female names -- like female faces -- age quicker than men's.
So you know instantly you're dealing with some age 40 or older as soon as you meet a Donna, Patti, Lisa, Lynn, Dawn, Elaine, Kelly, or Lucy. After around 1980, no girls got those names anymore -- it was all Britney and Alexis because of those TV characters.
2). Does anyone else get annoyed at the trend of parents giving their daughters boys' names? These are supposed to be "power names," and I have an in-law who purposely gave her girls boys' names so they "wouldn't be discriminated against by employers."
Maybe not, but I bet men tend to do some unconscious discrimination whenever they meet a female Drew, Riley, or Charlie. Also note that Hollywood constantly does this in movies, so right there you know it's not a good idea.
Addendum: Has anyone ever met a girl named Amber who wasn't a carousel rider?
1). Women's names give away their ages. They can try to lie, but female names -- like female faces -- age quicker than men's.
So you know instantly you're dealing with some age 40 or older as soon as you meet a Donna, Patti, Lisa, Lynn, Dawn, Elaine, Kelly, or Lucy. After around 1980, no girls got those names anymore -- it was all Britney and Alexis because of those TV characters.
2). Does anyone else get annoyed at the trend of parents giving their daughters boys' names? These are supposed to be "power names," and I have an in-law who purposely gave her girls boys' names so they "wouldn't be discriminated against by employers."
Maybe not, but I bet men tend to do some unconscious discrimination whenever they meet a female Drew, Riley, or Charlie. Also note that Hollywood constantly does this in movies, so right there you know it's not a good idea.
Addendum: Has anyone ever met a girl named Amber who wasn't a carousel rider?