[RestinPeace]

I just remember a few years back Roosh wrote an article about how different looks are valued differently, It was labeled under the name "The totem pole of racial attractiveness"

Reading at this it made me think for some minutes and led me to the conclusion that the more dark haired the country is (average hair color) the more competitive the men are?

For example in eastern europe Serbians are much more masculine and competitive when It comes to picking ladies than Poles, russians and let alone people in the Baltics.

The same way It happens in Western europe, Italians, Spanish and Greeks are more forward with women than French, But at the same time the French tend to be more aggressive when It comes to dating than Scandinavians, dutch, germans, etc.

I think There is a direct correlation going about hair color vs competitiveness, at least in the sexual department.

Edit: Its mostly about caucasian/european societies, I wouldnt say it applies worldwide since quite a few all-darkhaired societies are completly beta and there is little competittion such as is the case in east/south-east asia.

Anglos fall in the middle of the back, afterall they are mostly brownhaired whites (not many true blondes, but also they arent majority darkbrown-black) they have a mild game, which is more pushy than northern europeans, but not at exhaustive as those from southern europeans, but they always run with the advantage of developing "game" which is absent in most of non-anglo societies.

Any thoughts on that?

[berserk]

[RestinPeace]

(01-08-2015 01:20 PM)berserk Wrote:  

My observations arent true? why?

Could you come up with something that is actually valuable for this thread?

[bacardi123]

Well for starters not all people from a country look the same, nor have the same hair color. Since I am originally from a country that is on the same level as Serbia (Bulgaria), then yes I can confirm the Russian ladies tend to be far easier if you're from Serbia/Bulgaria/Macedonia compared to if you're from say Poland or the Czech Republic.

But I don't think the reason here is hair color, but the real reason is stereotypes. In western europe bulgarians have very bad name, usually the stereotype is gypsies who come to steal welfare etc. In Russia it's the opposite - being from the Balkans there = "heroic brave gangster" (if this makes any sense). In fact, when I was in Moscow it was so easy for me with the local girls that I simply gave up because I saw no challenge whatsoever. I mean I've heard in Brazil it's easy (can't confirm it - never been there...) but Russia looked the epitome of easiness to me. Then again I admit I struggled a lot when I was in Sweden and think will struggle even more if I ever visit UK or US again solely due to reputation of my country and not of hair color or eye color.

Side note: Many Russian women prefer blond hair and light eyes on guys, more so than Scandinavian women. Swedish women will go for any guy with dark hair as long as he is from western Europe or America.

[RestinPeace]

(01-08-2015 01:38 PM)bacardi123 Wrote:  

Well for starters not all people from a country look the same, nor have the same hair color. Since I am originally from a country that is on the same level as Serbia (Bulgaria), then yes I can confirm the Russian ladies tend to be far easier if you're from Serbia/Bulgaria/Macedonia compared to if you're from say Poland or the Czech Republic.

But I don't think the reason here is hair color, but the real reason is stereotypes. In western europe bulgarians have very bad name, usually the stereotype is gypsies who come to steal welfare etc. In Russia it's the opposite - being from the Balkans there = "heroic brave gangster" (if this makes any sense). In fact, when I was in Moscow it was so easy for me with the local girls that I simply gave up because I saw no challenge whatsoever. I mean I've heard in Brazil it's easy (can't confirm it - never been there...) but Russia looked the epitome of easiness to me. Then again I admit I struggled a lot when I was in Sweden and think will struggle even more if I ever visit UK or US again solely due to reputation of my country and not of hair color or eye color.

Side note: Many Russian women prefer blond hair and light eyes on guys, more so than Scandinavian women. Swedish women will go for any guy with dark hair as long as he is from western Europe or America.

I wasnt talking about girl's response but rather again other's male competition.

[_Cicero]

Interesting theory, and I see your correlation, but I suspect it's a correlation, and not a causal relationship based on genetics. You could also say that blonde-haired societies tend to be richer, and you'd see a striking correlation, but really what's going on is that northern Europe is richer than southern europe (and western europe is richer than FSU countries). There are lots of economic and sociological variables which probably cut the same way. My feeling with genetics vs. culture is that the cultural differences between, say, the French and the British (or Germans) likely swamp the genetic differences which affect dating culture.

[RestinPeace]

(01-08-2015 04:48 PM)_Cicero Wrote:  

Interesting theory, and I see your correlation, but I suspect it's a correlation, and not a causal relationship based on genetics. You could also say that blonde-haired societies tend to be richer, and you'd see a striking correlation, but really what's going on is that northern Europe is richer than southern europe (and western europe is richer than FSU countries). There are lots of economic and sociological variables which probably cut the same way. My feeling with genetics vs. culture is that the cultural differences between, say, the French and the British (or Germans) likely swamp the genetic differences which affect dating culture.

Blonde haired nations (Northern European/germanics) are richer because of the following reasons:

1) Northern societies are mainly based on reaching collective goals and set their goals on developing a wealthy life as community, where strictly individualist achievements are usually frowned upon, such as the Jante Law that evolved in scandinavia claimed , "you are nothing special".

2) They are societies that seek order and punctuality, as result of this those nations are more productive. Northern europe is a prime example of this.

If we follow the logic of #1 you have more "egalitarian" societies where nobody really has the hunger to stand out but rather to live a nice life without being anything special, because they dont believe they are something special.

Southern European (latin) are less rich because:

1) Societies lack of a real structure.. higher corruption and less productivism.

2) Less egalitarian due to the higher corruption and lack of social compromise, societies arent really competitive either or focused heavily into personal achievements, but their lack or order makes it hard for people to advance all together and give more blank space for some to show up and take advantage on Its holes.

Western (anglosphere) societies are rich but non-egalitarian because of:

Alike the Northern European ones they also have a stong structure that values puncturality and specially formality/law (even more so than in northern societies who tend to be more laid back about laws)

Contrary to the collective character of northern europeans, the main persue on anglo societies is to develop individually, there is a lot of elitism mainly inherited by the victorean area and spread all through the ex-british colonies, where you can easily recognize the big role that social status/class plays within the society.