Quote: (12-20-2014 12:48 PM)Soberane Wrote:
A woman's job has never been to reproduce to pass her IQ, women's IQ is irrelevant to male reproductive purpose, she has only to be young, pretty and physically healthy, a billionaire investor would have not trouble reproducing with a hot pretty 19 years old high school dropout that clean toilets at McDonald.
Actually, The Economist and a few other publications have written about income inequality being exacerbated by assortative mating on intelligence being more and more common.
What you suggest is what was more common in the 60's.
Not as extreme as your example, but the CEO or Doctor would nail and reproduce with the attractive secretary or nurse.
However nowadays you are seeing 'high value men' mate more and more with highly educated women who maybe aren't as attractive as that secretary or nurse from 1960 but combined give their offspring a ridiculous head-start on SES or potential IQ terms.