Are you religious?
11-03-2014, 05:34 PM
Long post incoming. Prepare yourself.
I think that calling religion "the ultimate blue pill" is silly (although to be fair I once held that view myself). In reality I believe it's the exact opposite: religion is the ultimate red pill. It's something that you might not want to believe (specifically, the idea that there is an all-powerful God to whom you will one day answer) but if you think and read about it enough, the conclusion is inescapable.
In my mind, the atheistic/agnostic view is completely absurd. The idea that the entire universe and everything in it is some kind of accident has got to be, with all due respect to those who believe in this, the stupidest theory anyone has ever seriously put forward. I think there is understandably debate over who or what God exactly is, but the idea that there is no generative force behind the creation of the universe is simply insane. It's something that only out of touch moderns like ourselves could believe, as we've been lulled into stupors by the endless distractions and comforts we now enjoy.
Nothing in the physical universe can exist without cause, and the idea that the physical universe itself, with all of its incredible complexity, just appeared out of a random explosion has no logic or coherence. Logic dictates that there had to have been something outside of the physical universe that was responsible for its creation. There must exist something outside the parameters that we recognize as encompassing reality, because those parameters themselves are aspects of creation. Time, space and causality must have been created by an entity not subject to any of them. That is God. He is logically necessary. Anyone expressing an atheistic worldview is simply saying that they haven't followed through the implications of the idea to its conclusions. Basically, you've simply passed the buck on literally the most important and fundamental question of your entire existence. I urge atheists to reconsider their views from a rigidly logical stance. I think if you are honest about this you will inevitably conclude that some kind of non-physical force must have been responsible for the creation of the universe.
Now, if we accept that some kind of creative force (which we call "God") is logically necessary, the question then shifts to: is God knowable, and if so, who or what is he? This is the question that divides mankind into the numerous religions of the world. From this starting point, it is easy to lose hope in answering the question immediately. With so many choices, how can we be sure we're right? Isn't it easier just to declare that even if we admit God is necessary, the safest and most logical thing is to not throw our lot in with any religion, since statistically we're likely to choose the wrong one? Well, not necessarily. We can make some logical assumptions about God that help us narrow down our options.
First, we can assume that God is interested in us. The universe was created for a reason. None of this is an accident or a throwaway cosmic science experiment, it's simply far too complex and intricate to be otherwise. And given that human beings are totally unique aspects of creation that stand apart from everything else, we must assume that God intended this to be so. Human beings are special. To put it one way, we are the stars of this show, to the amazing extent that the universe was especially created for us to inhabit.
Second, we can assume that since God is clearly so interested in humanity (a vast collection of persons), he himself must have some type of personality. He is not some unknowable cloud of energy. He must have characteristics that we would recognize as "human" in the broad sense. Does this mean he rides a cosmic horse or wears hats, or does other human-like things? No, not necessarily. It simply means that he has a distinct identity. He is knowable. When we speak of God, we speak of someone, not something.
Third, we can assume that given the innate thirst for religious belief in mankind, that God wants us to know him. Humans are hardwired to seek out God, and the vast, vast majority of men who have lived and died on the Earth have been theists of some type. Of course, this does not prove anything - just because 99% of people believe something does not make it true - however, we can conclude that religious belief of some type is fundamental to the human condition, and thus if we accept the idea of a personal creator then we must also conclude he intended that we seek him.
Fourth, we can assume that since God is a "person" who wants us to know him, that he would not leave us in the dark. He would communicate enough about himself to lead us down the right path. And since he is God and by definition all-powerful and omniscient, we can further assume that God's truth and revelation would not be hidden deep in some obscure text or limited to some tiny group of people. God's message would be universal in scope, applicable and known to all mankind. God would ensure that his message would be available to any who earnestly sought it out.
Fifth, we can assume that since God's message is universal, it must speak equally to the hearts of everyone in the world. It would not be a message bound by particular ethnic practices or traditions. It would be something recognizably different, something that fundamentally appeals to human beings of every race and culture.
I could probably list a few more assumptions, but I'll stop there with these five. Now, given these logical assumptions about the nature of God, I believe we have a much easier task in determining which religious belief actually represents the true God, the creator of the universe. In my view, Christianity becomes to the clear choice. Why, exactly? I'll try to be brief.
To begin with, there is the Bible. The Bible is a remarkable book, and the more you read it and learn about it, the more obvious it becomes that it was divinely inspired. The coherence and non-contradictory nature of its message, the circumstances of its composition (40 different writers over 1500 years in three languages), the extremely statistically unlikely preservation of accurate original texts and many other features make the Bible totally unique among books. The grandest works of purely human composition absolutely pale in comparison, as do other religious texts. The Bible is simply a masterpiece which humanity alone was incapable of writing.
Then there is the message of Christianity: that man is essentially a fallen creature in need of redemption. On its face, it's a strange message. It's not the kind of message that man would invent. Most other man-made religious traditions express the idea that man is fundamentally good, or is at least capable of becoming good through his own effort. This is naturally the sort of idea we would expect men to create. Christianity takes the complete opposite approach, which is highly unusual and sets it apart from other religions. The corollary to man being a fallen creature is the revelation of Jesus Christ, God's son, as redeemer, through faith in whom mankind can be reconciled with God. God sets the bar fairly low. He only asks for our honest faith. Everyone who seeks shall find. Remember, this is exactly what we'd expect from a personal God who wants us to know him.
Finally, consider the fruits of Christianity. Are men better of as Christians than as atheists, or as Muslims, or as believers in any other religion? In the modern West we are currently living through the decline of Christianity. Do you think things are going well? Are our societies doing great? Hardly. Spiritually we are dead. Culturally we are circling the drain, socially we are an absolute mess. In contrast, the West thrived when it embraced Christianity. In fact, there is ample evidence to believe that Western civilization is in fact inseparable from Christianity, a hypothesis which in my opinion seems more true with each passing day.
On a personal level, as well, I believe a man is clearly better off as a Christian. I know I am. Christian faith gives a man strength, endurance and peace that he didn't have before. As an analogy, if you think of human beings as computers, think of Christianity as being the operating system designed for us. It's how we function at our best. Sure, you can run another OS on the human computer, but you'll get a lot of crashes and bugs (depression, social dysfunction, nihilism, self-destructive behavior, etc...). Christian faith does not make a man perfect by any means, but genuine faith unquestionably improves his life.
If anyone has any questions about Christianity or would like to discuss anything I wrote in this post further, feel free to PM me.
[size=8pt]"For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.”[/size] [size=7pt] - Romans 8:18[/size]