[Seth_Rose]

It's becoming too frequent that I see some asinine article or video by a SJW, feminist, uber-liberal etc. I just made a thread this morning about a Washington Post writer who lets her son's get their toenails painted:

http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-41550.html

And this afternoon I saw this 'treasure'

Instead of getting outraged and stressed at these types of things, Im starting to just laugh at them. Hopefully others can do the same while maintaining a red-pill frame of mind, and sharing that mindset with others.

So if you have an article or video that you don't want to start a new thread for, post it here.

[Go-getter]

Wow, this is truly one of the most in-your-face and obnoxious pictures of your rotten and derailed American society. And I've seen a lot.

PS. Are those side head movements when talking (particularly making statements full of shit) common among females with feminist traits? Where I come from no people do that, seeing that in this video is extremely cringe-inducing.

[BLarsen]

(10-21-2014 05:23 PM)Go-getter Wrote:  

Wow, this is truly one of the most in-your-face and obnoxious pictures of your rotten and derailed American society. And I've seen a lot.

PS. Are those side head movements when talking (particularly making statements full of shit) common among females with feminist traits? Where I come from no people do that, seeing that in this video is extremely cringe-inducing.

>Are those side head movements when talking (particularly making statements full of shit) common among females with feminist traits? Where I come from no people do that, seeing that in this video is extremely cringe-inducing.

Whoever coached these children had a very specific character in mind: the stereotype of a pissed-off black woman. Finger wagging, eye rolling, neck popping, sticking their butts out, and the icing on the cake, lots of foul language.

Some black feminist is going to pick up on this and write about it :-)

[CRR]

   

[vinman]

Ok, I made it about 45 seconds into the video. I've watched people die with my own eyes and it never gave me as much revulsion as this video. Little girls dressed like princesses, talking and acting like cum gurgling thunder cunts is just too much to bear.

[PrimeTime32]

They're simply using this agenda to push products. If you watch the video it says something about $5 to buy a sweatshirt or shirt. This is nothing more than another pathetic attempt by SJW's to capitalize off the decline of American women.

[Krusyos]

The degeneracy and depravity of the Feminist never ceases to amaze me. In the olden days, such whores would be stripped naked and paraded through the streets, but that was back when women actually had some shame.

EDIT: I mean to say the women who forced the girls to do this, not the girls themselves.

[MdWanderer]

I won't comment on what I really think of this video, lest I get banned.

[Only One Man]

"A person's weight/health is only between them and their doctor."

"The friendzone doesn't exist."

"All bodies are good bodies."

"You can't tell how healthy someone is by looking at them."

"Rape is about power, not sex."

"Drunk people can't consent."

"Domestic violence is never, ever the woman's fault."

[El Chinito loco]

The catchphrases, insults, and terms used by Feminists and SJW are all just baby talk. This indicates individuals who are emotionally stunted and generally undeveloped beyond adolescence. It's also unsurprising that a lot of feminists you see on the internet all have that crazy bi-polar look too.

Some examples of feminist/sjw baby talk:

Mansplainin' - Man explanation: It's supposed to mean men taking on a condescending tone and talking down or some nonsense. It's usually just thrown out there to derail any conversation when a man has the temerity to argue against even the most irrational feminist boilerplate.

Shitlord - Not sure why this became popular. Even my 11 year old nephew would consider this a dumb insult.

wow, just wow - Used to express amazement and disbelief. They probably took it out of a shitty network sitcom.

selfie - popularized by millenials and not so much just by feminists/sjw but it's still baby talk.

grrrl power - It's some lame empowerment catchphrase taken from a cartoon and popularized in the '00s.


There are a lot of other examples i'm sure..

When I meet someone who says these things in real life I know they are a complete fuckwit and to be ignored.

[Redwood]

A definitive product of shitty American parenting.

[Suits]

Video was removed by Youtube. Can anyone who has seen it summarize?

[alexdagr81]

Quote:

Q. My Sister’s Parenting: My sister has this idea that she shouldn’t confine her son to traditional gender stereotypes. Recently she started dressing him in feminine clothing. He is 4 years old and gets teased at his day care and has expressed many times how much he hates his dresses and pink tutus. She keeps telling him the other children are wrong to tease him and he should be proud of dressing that way. What can I say to her without insulting her parenting skills?

A: Your sister’s behavior will not have your son embrace her ideals of gender fluidity, it will make her boy turn against her and forever scar their relationship. My daughter was a decidedly un-princessy little girl. If at 4 years old I had insisted she go to school in a tutu, she would have ripped it off and refused to leave the house. (Even in nursery school she picked her own outfits and one of my favorites was the Tyrannosaurus rex sweatshirt and pearls.) If your nephew insisted on wearing a pink tutu and was teased because of it, that would be an understandably difficult situation, but one that everyone could work on together to make her boy feel happy and secure. But what you are describing is a deranged attempt by your sister to impose her views—or even work out her issues—literally on the back of a small child. I hope you have some influence with your sister and can tell her that her ideals are lovely, but children need to have their own identities and it’s painful to see your nephew so miserable because he can’t wear the normal boy clothes he desires. If she won’t see reason, then it is reasonable for you to privately contact the head of the day care center and ask her to try to intervene with your sister, explaining her son’s misery over his clothing is stunting his social development.

I like the idea of rejecting gender norms by enforcing gender norms even if it hurts someone.

[Alpha]

In this video: Tumblrettes accidentally reveal that they really are just a bunch of children.

[Dr. Howard]

(10-21-2014 06:01 PM)PrimeTime32 Wrote:  

They're simply using this agenda to push products. If you watch the video it says something about $5 to buy a sweatshirt or shirt. This is nothing more than another pathetic attempt by SJW's to capitalize off the decline of American women.

True, a comparable example are these 'obstacle runs' for breast cancer etc. I had the good fortune of seeing the books for one and they held to their cause of donating "30% of the net profits to charity" which was crafty because

1. 1 Organizers paid themselves solid wages, which is a pre profit expense
2. 2 The charitable deductions can be expenses up to 10% of net profits
   

These guys, and some girls were running this all over the midwest and killing it in terms of gains.

[Kitsune]

http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-41505-...#pid859549

At 4:04 of that interview:

"[MikeCF] is a manosphere/Mens rights guy who talks about how it's not rape if the participants are willing."

[MdWanderer]

(10-22-2014 10:46 AM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

(10-21-2014 06:01 PM)PrimeTime32 Wrote:  

They're simply using this agenda to push products. If you watch the video it says something about $5 to buy a sweatshirt or shirt. This is nothing more than another pathetic attempt by SJW's to capitalize off the decline of American women.

True, a comparable example are these 'obstacle runs' for breast cancer etc. I had the good fortune of seeing the books for one and they held to their cause of donating "30% of the net profits to charity" which was crafty because

1. 1 Organizers paid themselves solid wages, which is a pre profit expense
2. 2 The charitable deductions can be expenses up to 10% of net profits
   

These guys, and some girls were running this all over the midwest and killing it in terms of gains.

Is it just me, or do I think that there is already a cure for cancer and these organizations are just trying to milk as much money of our donations for "research" as possible? It's the same as the oil companies. We could already be on solar and electric energy as our predominant source but that would put Big Oil out of business (can't have that now, which is why we're fighting Third World countries smaller than the state of Texas over in the Middle East so America, with 300 million plus people and probably that many nuclear weapons, can be safe).

[Slim Shady]

No comment on the boy at the end dressed as a princess? Good god.

"When you shame boys for acting like a girl, you are showing your hate for girls"

No you dipshit. We shame girls for acting like a smug jock too.

[Seth_Rose]

Looks like the video in the OP was taken down. Go to this thread to see it:

http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-41576.html

Post any other content you wish to share though.

[Jackr]

From "Lena Dunham's Race Problem" (Gawker):

Quote:

I'm all for freedom of expression, having sex and embracing your naked self on TV—that's the prerogative of any woman

^^ That made me chuckle, but the author outdoes herself for obliviousness in the very next sentence:

Quote:

But it's still a young naked woman in her 20s having sex on TV, the image of which, last I checked, is wildly appealing to heterosexual men.

This "young naked woman" who is "wildly appealing to heterosexual men" is Lena Dunham. Here's a NSFW link to stills of Lena Dunham naked.

[Ingocnito]

That slob-ass mom..

[Youngalpha]

http://thisisthinprivilege.tumblr.com/ You can all have a hearty laugh at these delusional landwhales.