[deathtofatties]

Have you ever secretly wanted to be a fat, repulsive, slut walking, ball busting feminist? I hope not. But since there are large online communities of them, a mighty fine opportunity to disrupt things presents itself.

You might be familiar with my previous attempts at trolling and satire, I've decided I want to take things a bit further... I'm working on a website that is going to appear to be a general advice blog for women, but with a repugnantly repulsive, yet still believable, taint of feminism and female entitlement.

Here's your chance to really show the world how fat, ugly, disgusting, and entitled feminists really are. We are going to co-opt their movement, and blow it up. Everyone will begin to hate feminists.

Private Message me for further details.

[Ocelot]

Good luck, brave warrior. A couple of suggestions for when you get this project going:

• Keep the content well in the realm of believability. Moderate any articles out that are too obvious. The first stage of subverting the enemy is to co-opt their own rhetoric and drive it to ever more extreme heights.
• Following on from this point, it would be hilarious if you could somehow persuade writers from XOJane or Jezebel to pen a couple of articles for you, selling the project as a "women's advice blog", as you put it. It would lend credibility to the venture and deflect suspicions that the whole thing's a hoax.
• If you can manage it, don't announce the name of the site anywhere on the manosphere. Once the cat's out of the bag, you can expect major news sites to post articles warning people about this "dangerous, and misogynistic fake blog", because they know how much damage subversion does.
  

If you do this right, you could actually make quite a bit of money out of trolling fat lesbians. Has there ever been a more noble cause?

[The Reactionary Tree]

There is already a good one: Anne Gus over at Thought Catalog

[iamdegaussed]

Anne Gus is pretty obvious though.

[kbell]

You've gone missing for awhile.

[deathtofatties]

(09-11-2014 04:22 PM)Ocelot Wrote:  

Good luck, brave warrior. A couple of suggestions for when you get this project going:

• Keep the content well in the realm of believability. Moderate any articles out that are too obvious. The first stage of subverting the enemy is to co-opt their own rhetoric and drive it to ever more extreme heights.
• Following on from this point, it would be hilarious if you could somehow persuade writers from XOJane or Jezebel to pen a couple of articles for you, selling the project as a "women's advice blog", as you put it. It would lend credibility to the venture and deflect suspicions that the whole thing's a hoax.
• If you can manage it, don't announce the name of the site anywhere on the manosphere. Once the cat's out of the bag, you can expect major news sites to post articles warning people about this "dangerous, and misogynistic fake blog", because they know how much damage subversion does.
  

If you do this right, you could actually make quite a bit of money out of trolling fat lesbians. Has there ever been a more noble cause?

Good advice.

[LemonDrink]

lol... That's a real good idea.

[deathtofatties]

I created a new form for contributors. PM me for the sign up form. A lot of volunteers have signed up so far. The more the merrier! Cheers!

[HawkWrites]

Don't. Just... don't.

As men we pride ourselves on remaining rational and assessing situations from a logical standpoint.

Don't stoop to the level of the feminists (even if you're faking it) since you'll do nothing but emasculate yourself in the process. Pretending to be "one of them" won't do you any good and while it may gain you some temporary support from the other side it will erode your soul from the inside out.

This isn't satire; this is a straight-up false-flag operation that won't do you any good in the long-run.

You don't need to resort to their tactics in order to combat them effectively; merely being a man and presenting your arguments with reason to contradict their hypocrisy is more than enough.

[deathtofatties]

(09-13-2014 04:31 AM)HawkWrites Wrote:  

Don't. Just... don't.

As men we pride ourselves on remaining rational and assessing situations from a logical standpoint.

Don't stoop to the level of the feminists (even if you're faking it) since you'll do nothing but emasculate yourself in the process. Pretending to be "one of them" won't do you any good and while it may gain you some temporary support from the other side it will erode your soul from the inside out.

This isn't satire; this is a straight-up false-flag operation that won't do you any good in the long-run.

You don't need to resort to their tactics in order to combat them effectively; merely being a man and presenting your arguments with reason to contradict their hypocrisy is more than enough.

You bring up some good points, and all of them crossed my mind before. However, I respectfully disagree.

It is going to be satire, though more subtle than Nigel's big game blog. Satire and trolling (and humor) is exclusively the realm of men, and is all quite masculine when done well. You must be logical to bend logic in ways that poke fun at illogical realities. Humor, satire, trolling... they are all ways of demonstrating that such false-logic is illogical. Follow me here? It is a manly art.

Feminist hypocrisy has been exposed a million times (and we should continue exposing it) but the knowledge needs to be sent through other pathways. We all know how stupid feminists are, but still our arguments and rational thought seems to remain within our own manosphere. Reason and rationality are exclusively the realm of enlightened, masculine men, however there are many more men, and everyone else, that still need to be corrected. Humor reaches the soul.

The straight, intellectual frontal assault by direct argument is a blunt instrument indeed, it is a war of attrition. How often do people win arguments? Never. The message hasn't gotten far enough.

For the majority of humanity, logic will never prevail, but that doesn't mean that a truth that is logical cannot be instilled in them. Humor has greater penetration than anything else.

We can make the whole world laugh at them.

[bojangles]

I think it's a good idea, I hope you do well and I agree with your assumption of satire and trolling to be in the realm of men.

[Phoenix]

Obviously don't put a link here when it's done, that would unravel it real quick.

[deathtofatties]

One more thing I forgot to mention: The best way to frustrate white knights, betas, and male feminists simps, is by exposing them to extreme feminists and watching them get humiliated and smugly acknowledged as the lackeys they are. Deep down, even feminists hate betas, and they'll all know it sooner or later. we're just speeding up the inevitable.

A great example noted here: http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-40335.html

[The Reactionary Tree]

(09-11-2014 04:42 PM)iamdegaussed Wrote:  

Anne Gus is pretty obvious though.

Read the comments section of her posts. Anne Gus fools a lot of people.

Besides, I have seen and heard so many ridiculous things from the political left that it wouldn't surprise me if some of the extremists in their camps agreed with every word Anne Gus posts.

[ThrustMaster]

Also when you use images in your posts make sure you mess with them just enough that reverse image searches cannot be used on them. Like strip EXIF and resize etc.

[deathtofatties]

(09-13-2014 01:52 PM)getswole Wrote:  

Also when you use images in your posts make sure you mess with them just enough that reverse image searches cannot be used on them. Like strip EXIF and resize etc.

I flip them horizontally and change the contrast.

strip EXIF? I need to look into that.

[ThrustMaster]

Good work I image searched the Sinnead Occonor slug in the other dealio and came up snake eyes. Good on ya!

When you poach images off the 'Net sometimes the EXIF data is included in a "Save As" situation. Really depends on what the original post was. Most of the people openly posting selfies to the 'Net don't realize the wealth of information in the EXIF fields when they do it. One of the extended EXIF fields is LAT/LONG you can turn this off on your smartphones, most of these imbeciles don't know better. This data, then in turn makes it easier for the image search sites to categorize and group the images.

Of course what we're doing here is to make it harder for those seeking to disprove a troll post. Again I'm impressed. Good work mate.

(09-13-2014 02:00 PM)deathtofatties Wrote:  

(09-13-2014 01:52 PM)getswole Wrote:  

Also when you use images in your posts make sure you mess with them just enough that reverse image searches cannot be used on them. Like strip EXIF and resize etc.

I flip them horizontally and change the contrast.

strip EXIF? I need to look into that.

[deathtofatties]

(09-13-2014 02:04 PM)getswole Wrote:  

Good work I image searched the Sinnead Occonor slug in the other dealio and came up snake eyes. Good on ya!

When you poach images off the 'Net sometimes the EXIF data is included in a "Save As" situation. Really depends on what the original post was. Most of the people openly posting selfies to the 'Net don't realize the wealth of information in the EXIF fields when they do it. One of the extended EXIF fields is LAT/LONG you can turn this off on your smartphones, most of these imbeciles don't know better. This data, then in turn makes it easier for the image search sites to categorize and group the images.

Of course what we're doing here is to make it harder for those seeking to disprove a troll post. Again I'm impressed. Good work mate.

(09-13-2014 02:00 PM)deathtofatties Wrote:  

(09-13-2014 01:52 PM)getswole Wrote:  

Also when you use images in your posts make sure you mess with them just enough that reverse image searches cannot be used on them. Like strip EXIF and resize etc.

I flip them horizontally and change the contrast.

strip EXIF? I need to look into that.

I also create composite faces. For example, Nigel's face is OJ Simpson plus R. Kelly in one. Same goes for my other trolls. It's amazing what you can do with opacity filters and soft-erase tools in photoshop.