[runsonmagic]

Everyone's favorite feminist porn star is back with a a deconstruction of feminine infighting. It's a Jezebel link, but worth reading in full:

http://jezebel.com/tearing-down-the-whor...socialflow

Quote:

I expected to be criticized for my work — I'm a porn performer — from my classmates at Duke. But from my fellow strippers, denigration for "sitting on a dick for a living" stung, if no other reason than that I didn't see it coming.

I am often asked if there is solidarity among sex workers. The answer, as I've come to slowly and painfully discover, is no. We're all essentially doing the same job — selling tickets to a fantasy — so you might imagine that, like retail, food service, or any other profession, we might have some form of solidarity. But what I've learned about the sex work heirarchy — or the whorarchy, if you will — has helped shed some light on some of the lies I believe all women are buying to one degree or another.

The whorarchy is such a good term we might have to co-opt it.

What I like about Bella is that she is a true believer. She genuinely believes her feminist ideals. While they might have been designed to help women avoid responsibility, because Bella grew up in a post feminist world she acts on them innocently, unaware of the feminine imperative behind them. It's like the blue pill for women.

Quote:

The whorearchy is arranged according to intimacy of contact with clients and police. The closer to both you are, the closer you are to the bottom. That puts "outdoor" workers, ie street-walking prostitutes, at the foundation. They are disdained by "indoor" prostitutes, who find clients online or via other third parties. They are disdained by the strippers and escorts who perform sex acts for clients, who are disdained by those who don't. At the top sit sex workers who have no direct contact with cops or clients, such as cam girls and phone-sex operators.

Because Bella Knox is a feminist, she doesn't understand the natural social competition of the female imperative. If women derive their status from the men they can attract, then women who have to give more sex for less status are lower status.

What shocks me about this article is that there are probably many young women who've bought these ideas because of their culture, who are completely unaware of the biological reality they were created to avoid. It's like a true believer socialist who gives away all his property to the collective, not realizing that those ideas were created by power-hungry members of the underclass, and is shocked when his comrades simply absorb his money without returning the same value.

Good luck smashing the whorarchy, ladies.

[Roosh]

Quote:

I am often asked if there is solidarity among sex workers. The answer, as I've come to slowly and painfully discover, is no.

Replace "sex workers" with "women".

Some women find out what men have known all along... women are incapable of loyalty with anyone that doesn't serve them in the present moment.

[JJ Roberts]

I wrote a post about this a while back called "the circle of hatred amongst women"

http://sexthreepointzero.com/2013/06/25/...gst-women/

[ChocolateCockOfZeus]

(07-04-2014 01:24 PM)runsonmagic Wrote:  

"sitting on a dick for a living" stung, if no other reason than that I didn't see it coming.

[runsonmagic]

(07-04-2014 01:46 PM)ChocolateCockOfZeus Wrote:  

(07-04-2014 01:24 PM)runsonmagic Wrote:  

"sitting on a dick for a living" stung, if no other reason than that I didn't see it coming.

That's from the article. Don't put quotes around it with my screenname like I talked about sitting on dicks.

(07-04-2014 01:46 PM)ChocolateCockOfZeus Wrote:  

My screenname is a reference to what I suck.

See? It's not fun being misquoted. Don't do it.

[AnonymousBosch]

(07-04-2014 01:38 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Quote:

I am often asked if there is solidarity among sex workers. The answer, as I've come to slowly and painfully discover, is no.

Replace "sex workers" with "women".

Some women find out what men have known all along... women are incapable of loyalty with anyone that doesn't serve them in the present moment.

First thing I thought of too. All female groups naturally falls into hierarchies. Didn't these women ever go through high school? Why do they suddenly think all evidence of female nature they've seen up until entering the workforce suddenly changes just because jobs are involved?

Even the Social Justice Warriors are the same. Imagine being a Minority Lesbian in a Wheelchair and turning up at a feminist meeting. None of them would see you as a human being with your own needs and wants, but just as a High Value Score to greatly-increase the visibility of their tolerance.

[Days of Broken Arrows]

tl;dr

This woman's entire life is whining. Dunno how anyone could find this "sexy."

She comes up with complicated gender theories about why everyone from frat guys to strippers have mistreated her, but never stops to think it just might be *her* they don't like.

It never occurs to her that her whiny, attention-whoring phony, transparent behavior might be putting people off. The lack of self-awareness is astounding.

This is what the you-go-girl/ban bossy/throw like a girl brand of feminism has given us: women who are not just unwilling but unable to see how their behavior negatively affects them. Any criticism is rendered invalid, of course, because it's "slut shaming" or "blaming the victim."

By the way, she's auctioning off her shoes online. Bids started at $10 and as of 6 p.m. (with an hour and a half left) the price has risen to $75 with two bids. Unless these auctions bring in thousands, how well could she be doing that she has to resort to this?

[RawGod]

(07-04-2014 01:38 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Quote:

I am often asked if there is solidarity among sex workers. The answer, as I've come to slowly and painfully discover, is no.

Replace "sex workers" with "women".

Bella Knox, young and stupid, is learning this the hard way. She must be catching on that her role among Jezebel and HuffPo readers is simply to be the lowest of the low so that the female readers can feel superior.

[germanico]

(07-04-2014 01:24 PM)runsonmagic Wrote:  

What I like about Bella is that she is a true believer. She genuinely believes her feminist ideals.

She needs to. Whithout those ideals, shes just another whore.

Roosh Wrote:

Some women find out what men have known all along... women are incapable of loyalty with anyone that doesn't serve them in the present moment.

[WestIndianArchie]

Damn comments.

I like how Belle is talking about how her fellow female sex workers look down on her, and the Jezebel conversation is about men.

WIA

[Que enspastic]

(07-04-2014 05:26 PM)germanico Wrote:  

(07-04-2014 01:24 PM)runsonmagic Wrote:  

What I like about Bella is that she is a true believer. She genuinely believes her feminist ideals.

She needs to. Whithout those ideals, shes just another whore.

Roosh Wrote:

Some women find out what men have known all along... women are incapable of loyalty with anyone that doesn't serve them in the present moment.

Bella is the Lenin of the modern age. She's a step off a sealed train into the midst of revolution where she can peddle her ideals to the masses. Instead she finds Civil War threatening to swallow up her dreams.

She may become an authoritarian dictator from here on but you have to admire her ideals and revolutionary fervour.

[Hotwheels]

Nobody is bringing up her upcoming reality show?

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/201...lity-show/

I'll give her credit. She may be a slut, but she has figured out how to make cash and ran with it.

Thing is, it's so easy for women to do that when it comes to their bodies and sex, but very few figure it out.

If guys could make cash from getting laid we'd all do it.

[Trim]

There was a study about women hating sluts because they are under cutting them in the sexual market place. It all links together in the end. This is why you MUST get them competing.

[From Vegas to Tokyo]

Thank you Belle for reinforcing the realities of the red pill. Yes, there is no sense of solidarity between sex workers. The key to sex workers is, at the end of the day, they're just a bunch of chicks. The only thing that makes Belle any different from your neighborhood slut is that she's just a little more high profile and a little more public. I'm sure she sill has her alpha guy (James Deen?) that she fawns over, and betas that orbit around her like any other slightly attractive girl.

"Sex workers" are just like every other girl, they're just a little more public, and lack moral fiber that some girls have. No doubt Belle ranks below most of those jezebel feminists in the whorarchy, which was a good start but in reality only goes halfway up the ladder.

[AnonymousBosch]

(07-05-2014 11:58 AM)Trim Wrote:  

There was a study about women hating sluts because they are under cutting them in the sexual market place. It all links together in the end. This is why you MUST get them competing.

Men don't even need to try to get them to compete. They do it to themselves. It's how women naturally are.

If it's all truly sunshine and flowers at the Jezebel office, where everyone is truly welcomed and accepted; cliques and in-and-out groups haven't formed; everyone isn't shamed into overeating by the office feeder (1); and no-one passively-aggressively competes for status when describing their personal life. it'd be the only female-dominated workplace in existence where none of this happens.

(1) From what someone linked to in the past, it's not just a fupa the Jezebel clique encourage you to get, but Herpes, because 'everyone has it' and 'it's no big deal', (despite me having 25+ years of sexual activity, a damn high notch count, and a clean bill of health).

[Wutang]

(07-05-2014 11:58 AM)Trim Wrote:  

There was a study about women hating sluts because they are under cutting them in the sexual market place. It all links together in the end. This is why you MUST get them competing.

In the Fox News video that Hotwheels linked to, Belle Knox actually mentioned that she gets more hate from females on campus then males.

[ChocolateCockOfZeus]

(07-04-2014 02:08 PM)runsonmagic Wrote:  

(07-04-2014 01:46 PM)ChocolateCockOfZeus Wrote:  

(07-04-2014 01:24 PM)runsonmagic Wrote:  

"sitting on a dick for a living" stung, if no other reason than that I didn't see it coming.

That's from the article. Don't put quotes around it with my screenname like I talked about sitting on dicks.

(07-04-2014 01:46 PM)ChocolateCockOfZeus Wrote:  

My screenname is a reference to what I suck.

See? It's not fun being misquoted. Don't do it.

Wasn't my intention to make it seem like you sit on dicks...

[runsonmagic]

(07-05-2014 03:51 AM)Hotwheels Wrote:  

Nobody is bringing up her upcoming reality show?

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/201...lity-show/