rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"
#51

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

Not true, I was all done by 35-38, everything paid off and set up for life.

I did miss goofing off and an extended peter pan childhood to 28, but I am certainly relaxed and comfortable now while my peers who goofed off are working the 100 hours etc
Reply
#52

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

Quote: (06-20-2018 10:53 PM)lavidaloca Wrote:  

If you have to start saving at 35 it's going to be incredibly difficult. You are likely on the verge if not already experiencing the high expenditures in life. (Children, daycare, mortgage, car payments, alimony, child support etc.)

The reality is most people save fuck all. They spend everything they make and do so on stuff that provides limited value in terms of increasing their happiness. The obvious American example would be the oversized house and leased cars. That stuff provides limited if any increase in happiness yet people happily spend half their income on them and often more.

If Americans save its usually frivolous amounts that will take 4 decades to amount to anything. I.e. $100 or $200 a month.

One of the big issues is North American work culture doesn't provide for much freedom. You clock in and out, have screw all vacation time unless you work an eternity at the same company and then you still have too little vacation time. We have a society filled with people who rely on pills and junk to keep them slaving away. Part of the issue is the end of the tunnel is so far away for most people. Retire at 65 they say. So slave away 40+ years. Who the fuck can look 40 years in the future and make decisions based on 40 years from now.

Spend on the meaningful stuff that will actually make you happier. Hint: For most people vacations are probably at or close to the top of this list. Cars and McMansions are the killers that will leave you stressed, trapped and tight.

Ignore numbers. If you look at what it costs to "retire in the US" you'll see obscene figures imagining a lifestyle where you take $5,000 a week vacations to Paris. The reality is you probably will have a lot more fun in a place that costs 1/5th to 1/10th as much as a solo travelling male. Heck even as a couple you'll probably have more fun in a lower cost destination. You need to have an idea of what it costs to make you live happy in the place you want to be. (Theres a lot of places that are popular on the forum where people could retire and live on a few hundred thousand or have some base savings and some low stress work / business) Having million(s) saved in those countries will be virtually irrelevant. I suspect a lot of the forum members who have enviable lifes filled with travel and debauchery do so on far less than what you would imagine.

Other scenario is seasonal work. I still till this day thing the guys in the oil field are making the #1 decision in terms of having a great lifestyle. You can save enough money for it to be meaningful by the time you are 35 and you can travel 3-6 months a year to great places.

Everyone wants some sort of balance which involves total simplicity. Work 5 hours a day, 5 days a week, make a good wage etc. Reality is if you want to get ahead your balance will probably be huge periods of work followed by huge down time if you play your cards right.

Ya it's aiiight, it suited my lifestyle and I've had some great experiences traveling all over the world and my time working has been pretty fun too. I genuinely do enjoy working with a bunch of rough, blue collar dudes in oil refineries, pulp mills, ship yards and offshore rigs, it's just like being in a locker room all day where we talk about banging chicks and making fun of fags all day. It's not the most balanced lifestyle though, I had to work out of town a lot in places most people wouldn't enjoy too much but its part of the job. I've recently transferred to a new province and should be home every night, sleeping in my own bed, which was nice. So here I am at 35 with ten years of work experience under my belt, multiple trade certifications that have gotten me work all over Canada over the years in a variety of industries. I'm still very much "on the tools" because I like working and don't want to sit in an office or deal with management types all day but I figure that I will make that transition within the next 5-10 years.

All of the companies I've worked for over the years took me seriously because I had the tickets they needed to make money off of me, I never said no to work and I never had any serious safety incidents, I was and still am a very reliable technician who will work long hours in God forsaken shit holes with the understanding that "once it starts snowing, I start going!" This is one of the great things about being a unionized, skilled tradesman, you don't have to bag lick anyone, attend diversity training or work unpaid hours, if my company fucks me around I tell them to fuck off and walk across the street to the next gig, that sometimes involves moving though.

My advice to young guys would be to learn a skill/trade that can't be outsourced and is hands on, you can become skilled within 3-4 years and still go to uni part time or via distance education. Once you obtain your journeyman ticket then you can think about going back to school full time to finish whatever degree you choose or just continue working in your trade. A fully qualified welder or electrician with a business degree will get a good cushy office job with welding or electrical company or a company that supplies products to those industries because he has in depth knowledge and experience, they don't you that stuff in uni.

As for Aaron Clarey: I've been reading this guys stuff for over a decade because his blog posts are linked to my favourite Canadian political blog and honestly I preferred his material when he stuck mainly to economics, before the men's rights stuff. If I recall correctly, Roosh wrote a post on his blog about Clarey's after I reviewed his book Worthless in the book review thread, he wasn't active in the Manospehere back then but eventually got into it and the was the beginning of the end of me reading his blog although I have read most of his books which are pretty good, especially Worthless, Bachelor Pad Economics, Behind the Housing Crash and Enjoy The Decline. He's a bit too pessimistic for my tastes though and honestly I don't envy his lifestyle and as a general rule I try not to take advice from people whose lives I wouldn't want to live.

Edit: thread where Roosh linked to Worthless after I mentioned it: thread-11767.html
Reply
#53

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

Quote: (06-21-2018 04:28 PM)DonnyGately Wrote:  

Quote: (06-20-2018 08:49 PM)Crash_Bandicoot Wrote:  

I'm all about that stable life with an outside life as well in your 20s

Both can be possible, despite all the hate that a stable corporate cubicle life gets in this forum

Consider this as a 20s blueprint:

Pick a large cosmopolitan city (NYC, LA, Chicago, Big European cities if you live outside the US, etc.) and get a job where you can get out by 5 pm. The typical 9-5 job.

Work during the day, and then you have a ton of time to pursue side businesses, go on dates, meet chicks, learn game, volunteer, and most importantly, just experience life and lessons.

In Manhattan, most people in their 20s work until 7pm anyway at least if you want to get paid, and people don't go out until like 11pm anyway [unless you're doing dinner obvs]

Happy Hour in summertime is the exception but everyone leaves early for that and bosses are on vaca. But even if you didn't you can prospect a million hot girls in NYC from 10-2am or 4am on weekends, or later.

There's a ton of jobs in NYC that are 9-5...you just have to know where to look.

Government, Universities, and hospitals are the way to go. They also offer amazing vacation time as well (at least for American standards) and they are low stress. Even some startups are flexible. Yeah the pay might not be as high as a hedge fund or whatever, but being out by 5 - 5:30 and having a shitload of free time to do whatever I want is well worth it.
Reply
#54

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

Quote: (06-21-2018 08:47 PM)Crash_Bandicoot Wrote:  

Quote: (06-21-2018 04:28 PM)DonnyGately Wrote:  

Quote: (06-20-2018 08:49 PM)Crash_Bandicoot Wrote:  

I'm all about that stable life with an outside life as well in your 20s

Both can be possible, despite all the hate that a stable corporate cubicle life gets in this forum

Consider this as a 20s blueprint:

Pick a large cosmopolitan city (NYC, LA, Chicago, Big European cities if you live outside the US, etc.) and get a job where you can get out by 5 pm. The typical 9-5 job.

Work during the day, and then you have a ton of time to pursue side businesses, go on dates, meet chicks, learn game, volunteer, and most importantly, just experience life and lessons.

In Manhattan, most people in their 20s work until 7pm anyway at least if you want to get paid, and people don't go out until like 11pm anyway [unless you're doing dinner obvs]

Happy Hour in summertime is the exception but everyone leaves early for that and bosses are on vaca. But even if you didn't you can prospect a million hot girls in NYC from 10-2am or 4am on weekends, or later.

There's a ton of jobs in NYC that are 9-5...you just have to know where to look.

Government, Universities, and hospitals are the way to go. They also offer amazing vacation time as well (at least for American standards) and they are low stress. Even some startups are flexible. Yeah the pay might not be as high as a hedge fund or whatever, but being out by 5 - 5:30 and having a shitload of free time to do whatever I want is well worth it.

If you don't mind office crap there's also a ton of back office finance jobs that pay six figures (potential to reach 300-ish all in if you stay for the long haul) while still having 9-5 hours.

Most of the people in those jobs are there because they want the easy hours.
Reply
#55

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

Quote: (06-21-2018 09:35 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  

Quote: (06-21-2018 08:47 PM)Crash_Bandicoot Wrote:  

Quote: (06-21-2018 04:28 PM)DonnyGately Wrote:  

Quote: (06-20-2018 08:49 PM)Crash_Bandicoot Wrote:  

I'm all about that stable life with an outside life as well in your 20s

Both can be possible, despite all the hate that a stable corporate cubicle life gets in this forum

Consider this as a 20s blueprint:

Pick a large cosmopolitan city (NYC, LA, Chicago, Big European cities if you live outside the US, etc.) and get a job where you can get out by 5 pm. The typical 9-5 job.

Work during the day, and then you have a ton of time to pursue side businesses, go on dates, meet chicks, learn game, volunteer, and most importantly, just experience life and lessons.

In Manhattan, most people in their 20s work until 7pm anyway at least if you want to get paid, and people don't go out until like 11pm anyway [unless you're doing dinner obvs]

Happy Hour in summertime is the exception but everyone leaves early for that and bosses are on vaca. But even if you didn't you can prospect a million hot girls in NYC from 10-2am or 4am on weekends, or later.

There's a ton of jobs in NYC that are 9-5...you just have to know where to look.

Government, Universities, and hospitals are the way to go. They also offer amazing vacation time as well (at least for American standards) and they are low stress. Even some startups are flexible. Yeah the pay might not be as high as a hedge fund or whatever, but being out by 5 - 5:30 and having a shitload of free time to do whatever I want is well worth it.

If you don't mind office crap there's also a ton of back office finance jobs that pay six figures (potential to reach 300-ish all in if you stay for the long haul) while still having 9-5 hours.

Most of the people in those jobs are there because they want the easy hours.

Yeah back office finance jobs in NYC easily put out 100K+ as well. Great perks too
Reply
#56

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

If you join the US military at 18, successfully make rank, mind your finances (don't get divorce raped), you are 3 years away from a full retirement at the age of 35... All your shit is paid off and you have a permanent pension. Then as a young man of 38, you can start another career if you choose.

Of course there is always the chance you could die in some desert or jungle or, more likely, a training or transportation accident, but still. You could also choose to work in a comfy military admin job or a nice military hospital reducing those risks and still retire at 38.

.
Reply
#57

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

Quote: (06-22-2018 03:04 PM)Dulceácido Wrote:  

If you join the US military at 18, successfully make rank, mind your finances (don't get divorce raped), you are 3 years away from a full retirement at the age of 35... All your shit is paid off and you have a permanent pension. Then as a young man of 38, you can start another career if you choose.

Of course there is always the chance you could die in some desert or jungle or, more likely, a training or transportation accident, but still. You could also choose to work in a comfy military admin job or a nice military hospital reducing those risks and still retire at 38.

.

Yeah, but you're surrounded by dudes during your best years. Also, you're limited in what businesses you can start. For guys that aren't entrepreneurial, the pros get stronger, though.

The sacrifice is huge, 20 years of someone else telling you when to wake up and what to do. 20 years of not being able to drive down the block and spend time with your mom and pop, who just spent 18 years raising you, making sure they're ok...the sacrifice is huge.

But yeah, that pension is nice.
Reply
#58

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

Quote: (06-22-2018 03:56 PM)Spaniard88 Wrote:  

Quote: (06-22-2018 03:04 PM)Dulceácido Wrote:  

If you join the US military at 18, successfully make rank, mind your finances (don't get divorce raped), you are 3 years away from a full retirement at the age of 35... All your shit is paid off and you have a permanent pension. Then as a young man of 38, you can start another career if you choose.

Of course there is always the chance you could die in some desert or jungle or, more likely, a training or transportation accident, but still. You could also choose to work in a comfy military admin job or a nice military hospital reducing those risks and still retire at 38.

.

Yeah, but you're surrounded by dudes during your best years. Also, you're limited in what businesses you can start. For guys that aren't entrepreneurial, the pros get stronger, though.

The sacrifice is huge, 20 years of someone else telling you when to wake up and what to do. 20 years of not being able to drive down the block and spend time with your mom and pop, who just spent 18 years raising you, making sure they're ok...the sacrifice is huge.

But yeah, that pension is nice.

After Basic Training, it's pretty much like any other job. Make friends, play politics, and become a recruiter in a city you like.
Reply
#59

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

^ Do you military guys actually start receiving that pension right when you take the 20 year retirement? Even if age 38? You don't wait till age 55 or later to start receiving like a normal pension? How much $$$ would that be on average for a 40 yr old retiring with 20 years in, if you don't mind my asking...
Reply
#60

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

Quote: (06-22-2018 03:56 PM)Spaniard88 Wrote:  

Yeah, but you're surrounded by dudes during your best years. Also, you're limited in what businesses you can start. For guys that aren't entrepreneurial, the pros get stronger, though.

The sacrifice is huge, 20 years of someone else telling you when to wake up and what to do. 20 years of not being able to drive down the block and spend time with your mom and pop, who just spent 18 years raising you, making sure they're ok...the sacrifice is huge.

But yeah, that pension is nice.

I had a blast. You're surrounded by dudes, some of the best dudes you'll ever meet, but that depends. Work in hospital or admin and you're surrounded by chicks.

You get to travel the world and go to places you could never afford at that age, most likely. You don't work 24/7, you get plenty of time to chase pussy. You're prolly in great shape and chicks dig that. You get 30 days of paid vacation/year to go see mom and dad, plus if they need your help, you can support them financially. Not to mention, statistically, your parents will need you much more when you're around your retirement age (38), not when you're a bumbling child.

The "bummer" is, yes, it is indisputable, you will constantly be told what to do and when you wake up, but that's with every job.

There are several downsides to military service, but some people need the military a lot more than the military needs them.
Reply
#61

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

Quote: (06-22-2018 04:06 PM)christpuncher Wrote:  

^ Do you military guys actually start receiving that pension right when you take the 20 year retirement? Even if age 38? You don't wait till age 55 or later to start receiving like a normal pension? How much $$$ would that be on average for a 40 yr old retiring with 20 years in, if you don't mind my asking...

Yes, you get your pension the minute you retire for the rest of your life. Then at age 55, you can also begin drawing your Social Security benefits.

You also get free health care from the time you join for the rest of your life, over a lifetime that adds up to a fortune, especially if you develop a medical condition.

You also get a ton of money in educational benefits if you choose to use them

The pension money that you'd get if you retire at 20 years is 50% of your base pay which depends on your rank. It increases with the number of years you stay beyond 20. For example, if you stayed for 30 years you'd get 75% of your base pay as a pension. So and so forth.
Reply
#62

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

Work on a trading desk in NYC also, get paid way more than back office and hours are typically 7-5pm, go home hit the gym nap, have dinner and go out.
Reply
#63

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

Quote: (06-21-2018 07:11 PM)RatInTheWoods Wrote:  

Not true, I was all done by 35-38, everything paid off and set up for life.

I did miss goofing off and an extended peter pan childhood to 28, but I am certainly relaxed and comfortable now while my peers who goofed off are working the 100 hours etc

what i dont understand how you do this unless you inherit money unless i am missing something
Reply
#64

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

^Work like a donkey for 10-15 years in a high paying field and save as much as possible. I know high school drop outs who worked like that in the oil industry, saved 50-100K/year and ended up with about 1 million and that’s not including the value of their houses and pensions. I’m not one of those guys though, I definitely could have saved more, YOLO!
Reply
#65

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

The corporate world is definitely very petty, if you're a young it doesn't matter how smart you are or what you can bring to the table the older guys in management and executive positions will shit on you because they don't want a younger person to outdo them. These old corporate guys are the biggest betas they are slaves to their wife and in their petty anger they sabotage younger guys and sexually harass younger girls, secretaries, interns etc.

Don't get me wrong there are a lot of girls that fake sexual harassment claims and the #metoo movement is largely a meme at this point but there are more Harvey Weinstein's out there then a lot of people think and these guys are really fucked up.
Reply
#66

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

Quote: (06-03-2014 08:57 PM)Nascimento Wrote:  






'Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35.'

It's 10 minutes but I think it's worth the watch. Although I don't agree with some points, I do agree with others and some of the points he makes are interesting.

Thoughts?

This video was the most misguided thing I've ever watched on the internet.

In fact, wages for the average person rise very quickly in their 20s, and continue rising in your 30s. By your early 40s, most people have achieved their maximum lifetime salary. In addition, it's more difficult to learn new things the older you are. I started having some minor health issues in my mid-30s, and now, nearing 40, I can no longer work the same long hours I could have at 22. Employers will tolerate hiring a 22 year old with no work experience or graduate degree, but a 35 year old? Forgetaboutit. And you won't be capable of office work after a decade playing World of Warcraft if they did give you a job.

If you can get a job at a big prestigious firm out of college, you should do it. Work hard at it. Get credentialed with an MBA or an MA, and get some serious jobs on your CV. Saving 30% of your salary and investing it. Starting your own business. That's how you should spend your time from 22-35. You need to learn an industry really well. And then use your knowledge to get a paycheck. I also advise against a Ph.D. in economics. Only useful if you want the dead-end job of being a university professor. If you do that at all, do a one year MA at a school with a prestigious name if your undergrad wasn't prestigious.
Reply
#67

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

You should be building a "talent stack" through your 20s and 30s via depth and breadth of experience in various jobs, the most important talent, of course, being able to identify a problem and lead a team of people in getting it resolved. I'm almost 50 years old, and from what I've seen, most men's talent stack seems to reach full fruition around their late 30s or early 40s, but may grow at a somewhat shallower incline into their 50s. Of course, there are exceptions with people who are naturally gifted at this kind of thing and can start kicking butt in their 20s.

So, in my opinion, when someone is in their late teens or early 20s is their opportunity to have some adventures, such as being a Ranger or tank driver in the Army, joining the Peace Corps, being an itinerant photographer, etc. But around your mid-20s you need to get into a career and start getting some depth in a particular field. That should give you enough time so that when you're in your mid-40s you can reach near the pinnacle of earning potential for your career field.

I know that some of you who commented here have reached independent wealth by your mid-30s.
Reply
#68

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

I spent 4 years being a snowboard bum - would absolutely recommend. I worked some lame jobs and some cool jobs, learned a lot and probably got 10 years worth of normal 'real world' socialising done in less than half the time. Also met a lot of cool people who owned businesses allowing them to live a mountain life style for good as well as those who worked contracts around the world to tailor their time off to the winter and various holidays. It definitely showed me that the conventional 9-5 slog to suburbia isn't how I personally want to do life.

I'm from the UK so my experience might be different from those in the US. But here it seems the corporate world is a bit of a dead end to young people nowadays. The starting wages are ridiculously low (borderline unliveable) and there's no obvious scope to move up the ladder in any reasonable amount of time. It's part of the reason I took off after my degree to travel and figure things out. Coming back I'm very skeptical of buying into the company guy scheme and agree with a lot of what that guy from the video is saying. I would love for it to work how every new graduate imagines. Join a job for life and watch your salary increase year on year through promotions. But reality is moves aren't largely made on merit or who's payed their dues the longest - they're given on who's the best fit or rightly connected through family or golfing buddies etc.

From my perspective, young guys with good trade tickets seem to have it the best shot at being rewarded for 'honest work' i.e get your certs and get paid handsomely for a contract. I met a ski guy who has rigging certs and picks up contracts in-between the UK and Aus attending to shutdowns etc. Was bringing in £50k in his mid 20s while having 3 months of the year to travel and ski (that's doctor money around these parts). All my mates from my home town who entered trades all have detached houses and German cars by now as well. Those who've followed a traditional STEM degree paths are still at the bottom rung of corporate chains.
Reply
#69

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

I gained financial independence by 32 and you are not even going to start trying till 35? Good luck with that. Maybe you will be the bartender with tattoos, a big dog and a big truck serving me and my hottie a drink at the beach bar. I promise to tip well))
Reply
#70

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

Quote: (06-03-2014 10:02 PM)ddjembe mutombo Wrote:  

Interesting video, but there are some good points thrown into there. If I were to go back and redo it...

1) get a degree
2) enlist in the military
3) weigh your options after your terms of service

Having military on your resume is a huge boost, but going into the military without a 4-year degree imposes a glass ceiling.

I got my degree in something useful and have been working in corporate oil & gas ever since. It's a good gig, but I am a little more limited than the 3-step process I listed above.

If you have a Bachelor's degree - DO NOT FUCKING ENLIST. Get COMMISSIONED

I made my decision and enlisted with a B.A. I did manage to get a deployment in during my 4 years of service (A-Stan) and a GI-Bill with which to pursue another degree here in China, but I sacrificed alot of time. I am now 32. Luckily, I never married and make much more money than I did back home, but I still can't get over that feeling of what might have been had I commissioned when I had the chance.
Reply
#71

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

Quote: (09-07-2018 01:59 AM)choichoi Wrote:  

Quote: (06-03-2014 10:02 PM)ddjembe mutombo Wrote:  

Interesting video, but there are some good points thrown into there. If I were to go back and redo it...

1) get a degree
2) enlist in the military
3) weigh your options after your terms of service

Having military on your resume is a huge boost, but going into the military without a 4-year degree imposes a glass ceiling.

I got my degree in something useful and have been working in corporate oil & gas ever since. It's a good gig, but I am a little more limited than the 3-step process I listed above.

If you have a Bachelor's degree - DO NOT FUCKING ENLIST. Get COMMISSIONED

I made my decision and enlisted with a B.A. I did manage to get a deployment in during my 4 years of service (A-Stan) and a GI-Bill with which to pursue another degree here in China, but I sacrificed alot of time. I am now 32. Luckily, I never married and make much more money than I did back home, but I still can't get over that feeling of what might have been had I commissioned when I had the chance.

I was a commissioned desk officer in the US military for 10 years. If I could start over I would have become a warrant officer helicopter pilot in the Army. The pay is almost as good as a commissioned officer, but you don't have to deal with the bullshit competitive politics and brownnosing, at least not as much.
Reply
#72

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

Quote: (09-07-2018 01:59 AM)choichoi Wrote:  

If you have a Bachelor's degree - DO NOT FUCKING ENLIST. Get COMMISSIONED

This is simply not true for everyone whatsoever. A large portion of my peers had bachelor degrees when they enlisted. If you're doing a job that you are passionate about being an officer can actually prevent you from doing that job. For example, if you want to be a career warfighter, go around the world many, many times and fuck-stomp a lot of bad guys, being an officer is a horrible plan. A typical officer career path may allow you to see combat for 3 tours. One as an Assistant Officer In Charge (AOIC) of a platoon, the next as an Officer In Charge (OIC) of a platoon, and your final--even now approaching a more administrative role--prolly not going on the mission--Task Unit Commander (2 or more platoons), then you are going to ride a desk the rest of your career. Your days of seeing combat are over unless headquarters gets overran.

A handful of my enlisted coworkers received commissions, but would have had to leave their field to work in another arena and they declined the commissions. In fact, all but one, declined the commission. The one that accepted was really interested in medicine and he went on to become a doctor, then came back to our community to work in our medical departments.
Several guys received commissions in our field and became officers and many of them regretted it as soon as they left the battlefield and moved into headquarters.
Apart from pay, there is no conceivable advantage to being an officer, if your desire is be a career ass-kicker. Officers have mandatory career tracks and blocks they must check in order to advance and if they don't check those blocks, they will not advance. The moment you've checked the combat AOIC, then the OIC blocks, you're usually done and you're off to work in staff positions, aide positions, training, acquisitions, logistics, and eventually post-grad education, then back to staff work.

As an enlisted guy, you could work your entire career (20 years) and never leave the battlefield. If you stick around longer than that and are promoted to the higher enlisted ranks, you're going to start down a path that looks a lot like the commissioned officer's path. But you're doing that as an old man who's probably starting to get broken and beat down after 20 years of combat and, frankly, in the interests of all involved, you're getting too old to be running and gunning and are probably on the brink of becoming a liability, so you go to staff to keep an eye on all the officers. And guess what... You show up to your staff job with quadruple the combat experience (remember all the officers only get a few years tops) of any of the officers. You are highly respected and you weigh in on damn near every decision the officer's make.

"If you join the military NEVER ENLIST! ALWAYS BE AN OFFICER" sounds like someone who has never spent a single day in the military and has no clue about how the military really works.

In this case:
Quote:Quote:

I made my decision and enlisted with a B.A. I did manage to get a deployment in during my 4 years of service (A-Stan) and a GI-Bill with which to pursue another degree here in China, but I sacrificed alot of time. I am now 32. Luckily, I never married and make much more money than I did back home, but I still can't get over that feeling of what might have been had I commissioned when I had the chance.

I'm not busting your balls, just disagreeing with you and offering a perspective from someone with more than 22 years experience in this regard. Much respect for your service. Most people will never have the desire to serve or, they want to serve, but decide not to for a myriad of reasons, or more likely, excuses. 4 years in the military go by in the blink of an eye. In fact, at 4 years (which is exactly in your case) you've likely done one deployment. So, to me, as an NCOIC of your platoon, you're just barely not quite still useless. You've lost that "deer in the headlights" look... You know just enough to get you into more trouble because now you're not the "new guy," and are starting to grow nuts. It won't be until your next combat tour that you'll start to become useful to me and very special. Because, the one-term wonders are all gone--they grabbed their GI Bills and fucked off to college. You're obviously devoted and considering this a career and now it's your turn to start leading men in combat instead of following. You'll notice that in this time-line, all the officers that started with you are now moving to staff, having survived their combat tours, so **poof** they're gone and the brand new officers are coming in to check their combat leadership blocks while they're still young and guess what: they're the guys with the "deer in the headlights" look and you're on your 3rd combat tour, so it's your responsibility to train them, too.

The functions of an NCO:
1. Execute the policy and strategies of your commanding officer
2. Enforce rules and standards
3. Train junior officers

It's actually quite enjoyable and extraordinarily fulfilling. You can easily do this until you reach retirement eligibility, assuming your body holds up and you don't get injured.
Being a commissioned officer is not for everyone and you'll know who those people are when you have to work with them. Even the good ones barely get their feet wet in combat and by the time they're really good at what they do, they're gone of to admin land.
I had this "you have to be an officer to be successful" nonsense drilled into my head. I already had a bachelors degree, but I knew I was healthy and wanted to fight for many years, then figured I'd drop a package for a commission later on, so I enlisted. After my first tour, I knew I never wanted to be an officer.

Quote: (09-07-2018 09:28 AM)C-Note Wrote:  

I was a commissioned desk officer in the US military for 10 years. If I could start over I would have become a warrant officer helicopter pilot in the Army. The pay is almost as good as a commissioned officer, but you don't have to deal with the bullshit competitive politics and brownnosing, at least not as much.

This is very exemplary of what I was saying above: not all commissioned officers are automatically happier than their noncommissioned counterparts. People who've never served think that being a commissioned officer, "you're in charge," so that automatically makes you better. It couldn't be further from the truth. Junior officers can barely wipe their asses when they first arrive at the command. No one respects them just because they are officers--no one. They have to earn it just like everyone else. And the smart junior officers know to keep their mouths shut and pay attention to the more experienced coworkers. That's why they are called Assistant Officer In Charge, they're not really in charge of jack-shit. The term should be modified to: Assistant (to the) Officer In Charge because that's what they are. They do the OIC's bitch work while they are being trained by the NCO's. This allows the OIC to focus on Commander's intent, plans and strategies and how to get there from where we are. The amount of bullshit admin work that accompanies that is insane. That's not even to mention your overall service responsibilities or every day responsibilities, just for being an officer: writing evaluations, writing awards, writing training proposals, writing equipment acquisitions, establishing a budget and staying within it, disciplinary actions, command investigations, endless power point presentations, casualty assistance duties, and the list goes on to infinity.

Enlisted guys just have to focus on being tactically and technically proficient, enforcing the rules and standards, and teaching the junior officers how to be combatants and not just office bitches.

So, no, just "being an officer" is not better. The pay is slightly better, but that's it, and in my opinion, not worth it at all!

The civilian equivalent to what this type of advice implies would be: So, you are a bad-ass auto mechanic. You are the best mechanic you can possibly be. It's all you ever wanted to be and all you think about. Your passion is building hot rods. Every one you build just makes you want to do the next one bigger, better, and badder. You love what you do, so it's like you never have to "go to work." Every day is a blessing and you want to build hot rods until you are physically incapable of doing so.
Then the advice being offered is you should go to business school, get your B.A., and start working at ground zero in a management office of a major car dealership, where every now and then, you get a glimpse of the mechanics in the garage. It's total nonsense.

***The program that C-Note mentions is pretty cool. And again, guess what? It doesn't even require a degree. Nope. Zero college required. You can apply right out of high school and go off and fly helicopters for the Army as a Warrant Officer. You could fly helicopters your entire career, if that's what you desire. The thing is, right out of high school, you are not very competitive with the other military applicants or applicants with higher education, so you'll likely not be selected unless you bring something very special to the table (like you're already a helicopter pilot and crush the requirements) or there are simply more slots than applicants--still not a guarantee by any stretch and they will let slots go unfilled before lowering the standards. It's called Warrant Officer Flight Training.
I dated an Air Force girl who was not the sharpest tool in the shed at all, but she was an outstanding and remarkable airman. She applied for this program, barely passed the test minimal requirements by the skin of her teeth, but her record was beyond reproach and she was selected to this program. Never went to college. Never got a degree. Living her lifelong dream. But, now she has to be in the stinking Army, so blech...
Reply
#73

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

Quote: (09-07-2018 11:59 AM)Dulceácido Wrote:  

snip

So, no, just "being an officer" is not better. The pay is slightly better, but that's it, and in my opinion, not worth it at all!

snip

Also keep in mind that Officers have higher expenses. There's an expectation that you'll spend some of your income schmoozing, and engaging in other sorts of off-base events, or act charitably towards your troops. In many cases, this costs more than the pay raise, and your equal-age noncoms will wind up with a greater take home.

It's also largely recognized that some of the best Officers come out of the ranks. Not the most *successful* officers - but I don't think anyone here is temperamentally suited to being a desk rider in puzzle palace.
Reply
#74

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

Quote: (09-09-2018 09:54 AM)Aurini Wrote:  

Also keep in mind that Officers have higher expenses. There's an expectation that you'll spend some of your income schmoozing, and engaging in other sorts of off-base events, or act charitably towards your troops. In many cases, this costs more than the pay raise, and your equal-age noncoms will wind up with a greater take home.

It's also largely recognized that some of the best Officers come out of the ranks. Not the most *successful* officers - but I don't think anyone here is temperamentally suited to being a desk rider in puzzle palace.

Also you should be aware of things like re-enlistment bonuses and special pays that significantly narrow that pay gap. Of officers, it's expected, so they don't get those. For enlisted, they receive incentives. The take-home pay difference is not that significant and in some cases, the enlisted can actually make more than officers when you're working in different fields.
Reply
#75

"Don't try to work hard in life until you're 35"

I would argue it’s the reverse. I grinded and hustled in my 20’s and now can generate enough passive income to travel indefinitely if I want. I’m now 36, since 23 I managed to increase my income 4x, save, invest, owned several properties and it all paid off.

I would never want to start off at 35, working 30yrs just to retire at 65+.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)