Quote: (05-02-2014 11:18 AM)Samseau Wrote:
Just look at the debates... Obama was so clueless. It speaks volumes that Romney would have been 10 times better for America's interests than Obama. That's how bad Obama's foreign policy has been. Obama is a fitting president to America's end as a super power.
Not sure I understand.Samseau I think maybe you are NOT hip on what has been going on if you are buying into the nonsense. I don't mean it as an insult or anything(Roosh don't ban me lol)
Sure if Romney knew the Neo Con agenda,The Great Chessboard, 5 billion to support a coup e tat and even about Nuland's cookies ..I guess he could have predicted Russia would react.
I mean it really takes a genius to predict that Putin would be against a hostile Ukraine at her border. I mean its NOT like anyone but Romney could predict that Putin would draw a red line. That's because he is more intelligent than Obama and I guess he thought it was a coded message that only he understood when in 2008 during the NATO-Russian summit in Bucharest that Putin warned about taking Crimea and East Ukraine if NATO/WEST moves into Ukraine.
LOL.I am being sarcastic,can't help it.
Putin has been warning NATO/US/EU for about 10 years. The bigger idiot is the guy who hears the growl of the bear and still walks into the cave.
Obama's biggest crime is being stupid enough to allow the Neo Cons to still run their think tank agenda's. Nuland should have been thrown out of gov't. Mc Cain shouldn't be allowed on a foreign policy committee. His biggest mistake is NOT controlling his people. He even let Kerry lie to him numerous times about Syria.
Of course Romney is right. I mean of course if your a corrupt gov't like the US that believes in empire building and that the US is destined to control the world..Yeah Russia is enemy number 1. Russia has almost 8k nuclear bombs and another 30k that they can rebuild in short order. That makes them Superman to our Lex Luthor.
However , Russia doesn't have expansionalist agenda. That is a load of BS. They just want to keep their "near abroad" in order.
If you don't believe me..just check where they are spending their military budget. Mostly defense and "near abroad" short term capabilities.Instead of air craft carriers , they investing in 2 small helicopter carriers for example.
Numbers don't lie.. if they were interested in ruling the world or abroad..they would be investing their budget differently.
I feel sorry..because when Putin gets thrown out of office the next Russian leader will like be 10x more hardliner than Putin. He will probably be the type that will stand up and walk out of meetings after threatening to turn us servicemen"into radioactive waste".
Just like we helped create terrorism in the middle-east and a population that hates us there. We will have 140 million Russians who will grow up thinking that US/EU should be bombed.
And you know what? They will increase their military budgets.
They will probably with the new found patriotism have volunteers that will work for free helping to build tanks, T 50 stealth fighters, etc in their own time. Pretty easy to accomplish when one nation owns 33% of the worlds energy and raw natural resources. That is enough to make a hell lot of tanks,guns,bombs, planes, subs.
Historically long wars are often won by those who have access to the most oil, and raw materials and lives that are expendable. I think Russia trumps NATO in all 3 categories.