The author?
Quote:Quote:
Antonia Ayres-Brown is a high-school junior in New Haven, CT.
She didn't come up with her gender idiocy alone (from
Shine):
Quote:Quote:
The precocious inquiry yielded a series of communications between Ayres-Brown and the fast-food chain. It also led to some serious data collecting by the girl and her dad Ian Ayres — who is, unsurprisingly, a heavy-hitting Yale law professor and economist who has previously collaborated with his daughter on research — about McDonald’s employees and the Happy Meal gender bias. The findings had them filing a complaint with the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities in no time. And while McDonald’s was initially dismissive, Ayres-Brown writes, the daughter-father team finally achieved a sort of victory in the form of a letter from McDonald’s chief diversity officer Patricia Harris in December of 2013.
Just who is this Ian Ayres?
A rich, privileged law professor at Yale. A cursory look at his Twitter and Google search turns up a guy who wrote
this in
The Yale Law Journal. Here is the title:
Quote:Quote:
Tops, Bottoms, and Versatiles: What Straight Views of Penetrative Preferences Could Mean for Sexuality Claims Under Price Waterhouse
Here is the abstract:
Quote:Quote:
This Essay reports the results of a survey experiment that we conducted on over eight hundred heterosexual respondents to compare associational attitudes toward gay men who engage in different types of sexual practices. Specifically, we randomly assigned respondents to hear one of three descriptions of a gay character, which differed only with regard to the character’s penetrative preference: top (preferring to penetrate one’s partner), bottom (preferring to be penetrated by one’s partner), and versatile (having an equal preference). Overall, we find that heterosexuals displayed heightened and statistically significant associational aversion toward versatile characters and, to a lesser degree, toward bottom characters, relative to respondents’ willingness to associate with top characters. We elaborate why heterosexuals seem to display systematically less associational aversion toward those men whose penetrative preference is most consistent with gender stereotypes. Based on those results, we revisit the notion, adopted by many courts, that Price Waterhouse sex-stereotyping doctrine cannot apply to sexuality claims because it would turn sexual orientation into a protected class after Congress has opted not to do so. Our results suggest that gender-motivated homophobia is not uniformly targeted toward all gay men or uniformly present among all who discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation. We also further consider why respondents were most averse to versatility, drawing a potential distinction between “trait opposition” and “trait intermediacy” gender violations. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings for the broader LGBT movement in law and society.
Whew.....I bet homie gets half-chubbed reading
CRT bullshit.
This man has thoroughly indoctrinated this poor girl. What eleven year-old so doggedly pursues such an insignificant issue for years? He clearly is a poor father that probably is a typical arrogant, haughty professor. She idolizes him in a way that suggests he has forced her to worship him and his ideological ideas. She is nothing but a pawn. Since homie wasn't born a woman and the privilege of being a woman talking about issues affecting women, she is nothing but an object to further his delusions about men and women. His life:
Please, oh please I'm one of the good guys! only to jettison any female that affords him her approval.
Odds are, he was a wheyfaced nerd who got picked on constantly by more masculine boys. He developed a complex about these boys would become men, who also turned into the men women wanted to fuck. In order to slake his thirst for power born out of an inferiority complex, he pretended everything around him was a social construct, a fictive sorcery cast by the patriarchy to confound men like him from achieving their dreams.
He found out he was smart and rode that dog and pony show all the way to editor of the Yale Law Review and onto being a top professor at Yale. It never is enough for these types and once he realized he had a daughter on the way, he knew in his heart of sick hearts he finally had his ace of spades, the ultimate weapon in the so-called gender wars: a woman, a girl he could mold.
She is being praised roundly for being a role model, such a young ambassador for change that girls can mold themselves after. Yep, there's your female progress, your feminist triumph: a girl who after ordering a Happy Meal at too old an age running back to the all-important Daddy figure, "Daddy, daddy I did it! I am challenging McDonald's policy on gendered toys! Aren't you so proud I am standing up for all women?"
His response: "You did good, you object you."