[Deluge]

(04-12-2014 12:28 AM)speakeasy Wrote:  

And here's what I don't understand. Why are white nationalists and pro-white people on game sites? I've never understood that. Sites like this one, and Heartiste promote a promiscuous lifestyle. If you are concerned with white survival, shouldn't you be against this stuff? I would think someone of this ideological persuasion would be encouraging whites to marry young and start large families to reverse their low fertility rates. Do you plan on having 3 or more kids? If not, then you are committing genocide against whites too I guess since the end result means your group will disapear.

[soup]

(04-11-2014 10:54 PM)scorpion Wrote:  

It's unfathomable to me that multiple posters in this thread (including speakeasy, who I know is a very intelligent guy) are apparently blind to the fact that this is clearly a piece of pro-miscegenation/race mixing propaganda. I didn't think it could be any more obvious. I will quote the article and highlight phrases that clearly show this.

Quote:

It's no secret that interracial relationships are trending upward, and in a matter of years we'll have Tindered, OKCupid-ed and otherwise sexed ourselves into one giant amalgamated mega-race.

But what will we look like? National Geographic built its 125th anniversary issue around this very question last October, commissioning Martin Schoeller, a renowned photographer and portrait artist, to capture the lovely faces of our nation's multiracial future.

Here's how the "average American" will look by the year 2050:

[pics]

Wow. These are obviously not Photoshopped projections, but real people, meaning tomorrow's America lives among us now in every "Blackanese," "Filatino," "Chicanese" and "Korgentinian" you meet at the DMV, grocery store or wherever it is you hang out.

Their numbers will only grow. The U.S. Census Bureau let respondents check more than one race for the first time in 2000, and 6.8 million people did so. By 2010 that figure had increased to nearly 9 million, a spike of about 32%.

This is certainly encouraging, but there are obvious flaws with tracking racial population growth through a survey that lets people self-identify, especially since so many familial, cultural and even geographical factors influence your decision to claim one or multiple races. Complicating things further is the definition of race itself: It has no basis in biology, yet its constructions, functions and mythologies irrevocably shape the world as we know it.

So is an end approaching? Will increased racial mixing finally and permanently redefine how we imagine our racial identities? The latest figures suggest we're getting more comfortable with the idea, or perhaps that we simply give fewer shits than ever before. Either would be a step in the right direction.

The Wall Street Journal reported a few years back that 15% of new marriages in 2010 were between individuals of different races. It's unclear whether they've included same-sex unions in the count, but as currently stated, this number is more than double what it was 25 years ago. The proportion of intermarriages also varied by race, with "9% of whites, 17% of blacks, 26% of Hispanics and 28% of Asians [marrying] outside their ethnic or racial group." Interracial unions now account for 8.4% of all marriages in the U.S.

In addition, more than 7% of the 3.5 million children born in 2009, the year before the 2010 census, were of two or more races.

The future: As for how this looks moving forward, studies have repeatedly shown that young people, especially those under 30, are significantly more amenable to interracial relationships than older adults, while college grads are more likely to have positive attitudes toward them than those with only a high school diploma. What does this mean for Millennials? As a population composed largely of over-educated 20-somethings, our generation is primed and expected to play a major role in populating this projected future America. That goes double if you live in a Western state, where people intermarry at higher rates; Hawaii is winning at the moment, with 4 of 10 new marriages identifying as interracial.

This doesn't mean it's all sunshine, rainbows and butterflies, however. Stark segregation still plagues many parts of the country. Poverty remains a barrier to social mobility and its consequent opportunities to interact with a diverse range of people. Sadly, the inequalities that shape American society as a whole are equally present in interracial relationship patterns. Time will tell if this holds for the long term.

But in the meantime, let us applaud these growing rates of intermixing for what they are: An encouraging symbol of a rapidly changing America. 2050 remains decades away, but if these images are any preview, it's definitely a year worth waiting for.

I mean, unless the author wrote, "You there, young reader, get out of your chair and go fuck someone of another race right now!" he could have been any more clear. The message is that miscegenation/race mixing is the new coolest thing and the wave of the future, and that young Millenials should jump on board because they're sooo enlightened and educated.

Imagine a future where social pressure is such that to date or marry a person from your own race is seen as bigotry (if you are white, at least). Sound crazy? But is it? I bet a lot of people reading this right now think I'm bigoted just because I'm voicing my disagreement with the idea of race mixing. I'm simply supporting the continued existence of distinct races and I guarantee you that half the people reading this think I'm a bigot. Among the SWPL crowd we're already at the point where saying, "I would not date or marry anyone outside my own race," is liable to get you dirty looks and social ostracization. Give it another 30 years, and the line for being looked at as bigot will have moved from voicing your displeasure to refusing to partake. We're already seeing that shift with homosexual marriage: toleration is no longer enough, you must be an active cheerleader for the crusade or face persecution. And that shift has occurred in under a decade.

With an equally strong media push and propaganda campaign behind a pro-miscegenation agenda I could easily see mono-racial couples being stigmatized as bigots within a generation. Normal people can get away with voicing support for homosexuals without being one themselves, but if the social winds shift sharply in favor of mixed race couplings, there's really no excuse. "Not being attracted" to people of other races won't cut it anymore than "Not wanting to be around homosexuals" does today. Nope. You'll be a bigot. I mean, if you weren't a racist you would be dating someone outside your own race, right? You wouldn't want to continue the oppressive existence of white privilege by having white children, right? Of course not!

The progressive agenda rolls on unabated, one article like this at a time, most effective when people don't even realize they are consuming propaganda at all.

And by the way, anyone who thinks I'm a racist for objecting to this can go fuck themselves. This article is basically celebrating the fact that white people will be on the way to extinction (which is a good thing in the author's estimation) by the year 2050. I won't apologize for refusing to cheerlead for the demographic genocide of my people.

I think that facial beauty might have became more important for the whiter races because they had to cover up more of their bodies in the cold. People needed some way of telling if the mate was physically fit enough to reproduce with.

At the same token, body beauty probably took a place of less importance as compared to the warmer climates where people had their goods on display more often.

This is one possibility as to why the stereotype of white girls being prettier but darker girls having better asses etc. might exist.

I do think that the mixing of the races is going to result in a water-downing of the northern white look more than it is going to give white girls amazing bodies. This is based on what I know about darker skinned peoples genes tending to dominate lighter skinned peoples' genes.

In the future, the rare white super fine white girl with an amazing body is going to be pedastalized as an almost mythical creature.

[Screwston]

Its a tiny chunk of white girls that go out looking for minority dick so I don't know why any white guy would be mad over this article. Don't worry, your precious Barbie dolls ain't going anywhere.

[speakeasy]

(04-12-2014 01:12 AM)soup Wrote:  

I think that facial beauty might have became more important for the whiter races because they had to cover up more of their bodies in the cold. People needed some way of telling if the mate was physically fit enough to reproduce with.

At the same token, body beauty probably took a place of less importance as compared to the warmer climates where people had their goods on display more often.

This is one possibility as to why the stereotype of white girls being prettier but darker girls having better asses etc. might exist.

Interesting theory. I've never heard that before.

Quote:

In the future, the rare white super fine white girl with an amazing body is going to be pedastalized as an almost mythical creature.

In the future? They already are...

[Teutatis]

A future with only brown people? I love latinas but it sounds like a nightmare to me, no thank you, I like the world's diversity. I'm actually glad some mix raced people exist in this world, it adds up to human diversity, but a world with no races, colors, nuances, cultures, etc.? Hope I never get to see something like that, and I mean this not just for whites, but also for blacks, asians and every other race, ethnicity, whatever.

It's also obvious that these pieces are not innocent in the least, they come out with the intent of telling the general public that this is something good that we should strive for as humans. Just look how they try to portray mixed races people as somehow more attractive or better. While there are some extremely good looking mix raced people out there I'm sure that in relation to the mix raced population the beautiful ones are in the same proportion as the beautiful people in the general population, which means, a few beautiful and the big majority is just meh or ugly.

[Royale]

I normally stay away from racially based threads, since they tend in devolve into nonsense. But, I never understood this "anti-white" fear that plagues the manosphere, and other sites. My whole family pretty much contains someone whose origins are from almost every continent on the globe, so...

But, looking at the different parts of Central Europe, the Balkans, EE, Scandinavia, etc, it seems evident to me that even with the influx of minorities, these places are OVERWHELMINGLY white/Caucasian. Where is the genocide? Most people are going to marry and procreate with those who are similar to themselves. Does it matter that a few fringes do things differently?

I'm honestly trying to understand. As a matter of fact, I tend to disagree with the rampant exposure of "rah-rah" multiculturalism as if it's something to sing from the mountaintops. Yes, America is land filled with different types of people, from all walks of life. That's just as bad as those who are rampant nationalists who can't see past their own tribalism. Such extremes on both ends.

I don't know about you guys, but that article headline is obvious clickbait. Dude was trying to get his article read with the ferocity of a thousand feminists post ROK. Chalk it up with another "ZOMG America is so diverse," piece. In other words, water is wet.

But nevertheless, the content here is too great for us to be divided on things like race (social construct?) and other things. This is the 'sphere, where the loud minority can be heard. With that being said, have at it, gents. I'm out this bitch.

[BruceCreatine]

(04-12-2014 12:28 AM)speakeasy Wrote:  

And here's what I don't understand. Why are white nationalists and pro-white people on game sites? I've never understood that. Sites like this one, and Heartiste promote a promiscuous lifestyle. If you are concerned with white survival, shouldn't you be against this stuff? I would think someone of this ideological persuasion would be encouraging whites to marry young and start large families to reverse their low fertility rates. Do you plan on having 3 or more kids? If not, then you are committing genocide against whites too I guess since the end result means your group will disapear.

Websites mainly written by white men, that espouse non-PC views about the world and society and you're surprised white nationalist are involved?

I'm more surprised that black men come on here than white nationalists. There is clearly a right wing vein running through the manosphere, it's not necessarily white nationalist, but it represents opinions that many 'left-wing' people would dislike.
I notice many minorities (especially black minorities) tend to have 'left wing' views and so I'd imagine they'd be horrified by a lot of red pill ideas.

Regardless as someone who is half white I disapprove of the the wording you use. Just because white people prefer white people, are proud of being white and wanna sleep with white people does not make them a 'white nationalist'. I think it's a nonsense double standard. If I make comments about how great my middle eastern side is, no one will turn there head, but if a white person said the same things about being white a of of eyebrows would be raised.

Basically minorities can be proud of their side whereas white people are discouraged from doing so. White people have a lot of great history and being proud of being white is a good thing.

I intentionally troll SWPL types by starting talking about how great my ME side is and then switching into the same sort of comments about my white side. They're a bit confused how to respond ha.

[Crackshot]

Choosing to have kids with someone of a different race is not genocide how crazy to suggest it is.

PS ait of Russians have Mongolian and Central Asian blood which is why so many have slanted eyes and round faces. Russia is a white country with strong Asiatic cultural influences.

[Orion]

"White nationalist is concerned about survival of white race. Number of fornications with white women = 0"

[Valhalla]

I for one welcome this mixing

Mixed women are hot.

Half white half black girls are fly
Half white half Latinas are fly
Half white half Asians are fly
Half white half native Americans are fly

I can't wait till there's more of this


manospher should stop trying to politicize/bring race into things if they want to spread their message. Rollo has been talking about this recently

[Haig]

Hey,

I can see where Scorpion is coming from in some respects, as this NG article is race baiting on so many levels and is deliberately doing the old divide and conquer routine. (and with all due respect to every member here, It's even working on this Forum)

Also they are talking about us like cattle for breeding purposes and we are nothing more than livestock to them.

Now mixed marriages and inter-race relationships are and nothing new. You could go as far back as Egypt to find different races and skin color marrying each other for safety and prosperity.

personally I think this article isn't about the issue of mixed race people, its the destruction of the old cultures, traditions and history to then bring in a new super improved UN (One) regulated culture.

Just to give you a little bit of a background to where I am coming from.

Being born and bread in Scotland I am slowly seeing the erosion and destruction of my culture due to numerous factors, An aging and sick population due to heavy alcohol/drug abuse and a great benefit system that doesn't encourage people to get better. Scottish history not being taught in Schools/Universities, the Gaelic language being edged/wiped out, destruction and shipping work overseas of our industries E.T.C.

It also used to be punishable by death to wear your own Clan Tartan not only in Scotland, but the other colonies as well,this was around the 16 and 17 Hundreds which was a rather clever way of destroying the old ways and a form of bonding to your tribe and nation, an author called John Prebble writes a lot about this.

The Highland clearances as well was a mass genocide for many Scots as hundreds of thousands of men, woman and children were slaughtered.

Scotland's population is roughly about 5 and a half million, and under half that number is probably "indigenous" Scots, so there is roughly about 2 Million "Scots" left which is unsustainable for our history, bloodlines and culture to survive.

Also mass immigration from diverse nations who really don't share any commonalities with Scottish Culture are actively told to reject and ignore it as their is monetary benefit in doing so. There are a number of instances where GOVT and local councils will give more money,houses/flat tax breaks and incentives to non-Scots to create new ethnic communities within the heart of various cities. Again this is divide and rule.I am aware enough that the people who are coming in are just the next generation of wage slaves who are being manipulated by the same folk that do it to me.

Now I am not against immigration on the whole, as Scotland had an influx of Italians, indians and Pakistani's over the 50's 60's and 70's who integrated into Scottish life, nowadays it's a mixing pot mentality and just needs to be a better way, that unfortunately I don't have an answer for)


so to see my Culture get wiped out absolutely scares me and it has in my mind a deliberate plan to do so. HG Wells, Kipling, John Stuart Mills and a few others talked about wiping out anyone with a Celtic bloodline in them as they felt we were too troublesome for them.

History should teach us to protect and conserve our past because if we don't the atrocities of yesteryear that every race has faced
will rear it's ugly head again.

One theory I have is that the idea of different races/culture scare the living hell out of the Elite as people will always want to hold on their traditional ways, so by blurring and blending of cultures, gender roles, sexuality, nationalities ETC makes it easier for them to create new identities and cultures for them to manage. This idea that we are all one, like bees in a beehive serving one master.


Sorry if this comes of as a rant, but issues like this drive me insane, as its not the people who come into other countries in search for a better life that is the problem it is, has and always will be Government and the ruling elite wanting to keep the rats or cattle in a constant state of flux and animosity that we can never truly see whats being done to us. That is why our history and past is so important.

I don't hate anyone for wanting a better life, I hate the deception and manipulation of Govt and all its tools to deliberately cause chaos which gives them the power to create order.

We need to see past articles like this, and look at them so objectively that no emotive topics within it can cloud our reasoning.

“Those who control the present, control the past and those who control the past control the future.” George Orwell 1984

[scorpion]

Something for non-whites to keep in mind when considering this issue is the fact that white genes are recessive. What does this mean? Look at Barack Obama, who is half black and half white, and yet who looks black, self identifies as black, and is universally regarded as "the first black President". And rightfully so: the guy is clearly black.

So the idea that "white people wouldn't cease to exist" in a heavily race-mixed future is nonsense. Yes, they would. You wouldn't see any white faces walking around for more than a generation or two, because of the recessive nature of white genes.

It's also disingenuous to post pictures of models as being the standard look of mixed race people, especially when most of the models have white features. The pictures of the normal mixed race people in this thread are much more indicative of how they look, which clearly show a lack of white futures (again, due to the recessive nature of white genes).

The hypocrisy of non-whites here is astounding. Imagine me cheerleading in a thread and applauding a future without black people? Literally cheering for blacks to be bred out of existence. That would be extremely fucked up. Yet that is what this article is doing for whites, and people have no problem with it, and even defend it.

[runsonmagic]

(04-11-2014 05:32 PM)Blunt Wrote:  

I'm not for or against interracial marriages.

I am completely against the giddy tone that this article is written in.

This.

It sounds like the author has a hard-on for a world without white people.

Isn't that the diversity crowd's fantasy?

[BruceCreatine]

(04-12-2014 09:17 AM)scorpion Wrote:  

Something for non-whites to keep in mind when considering this issue is the fact that white genes are recessive. What does this mean? Look at Barack Obama, who is half black and half white, and yet who looks black, self identifies as black, and is universally regarded as "the first black President". And rightfully so: the guy is clearly black.

So the idea that "white people wouldn't cease to exist" in a heavily race-mixed future is nonsense. Yes, they would. You wouldn't see any white faces walking around for more than a generation or two, because of the recessive nature of white genes.

It's also disingenuous to post pictures of models as being the standard look of mixed race people, especially when most of the models have white features. The pictures of the normal mixed race people in this thread are much more indicative of how they look, which clearly show a lack of white futures (again, due to the recessive nature of white genes).

The hypocrisy of non-whites here is astounding. Imagine me cheerleading in a thread and applauding a future without black people? Literally cheering for blacks to be bred out of existence. That would be extremely fucked up. Yet that is what this article is doing for whites, and people have no problem with it, and even defend it.

I don't think Obama looks black. It is cultural for Americans to call him black, but if you look at genuine black people from Africa, they do not look like Obama.

My advice for you is to not stress about this, because as I said earlier anywhere where different groups of humans are nearby each other there will be mixing. However due to the larger number of white people, they will all eventually start to look like white people (so you can be happy), ha.

An itneresting test is when people talk about how they like immigration to the west, discuss, Chinese immigration to Africa and see how they react ha.

[BruceCreatine]

Haig, wait till Scotland splits and is turned into a left winger's dream. As a right wing brit, I really hope you guys vote yes, so we can get the tories in England more. A party that understands that the welfare state is a problem and that business matters. Once we unload the dead weight (Scotland) we can really clean house on all these lefty nonsense politics.

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

I don't give a shit what 1) color of skin and 2) facial features the people around me have or will have in the future or what language they're going to speak. However, I'm offended by the article's not-so-subtle implication that the current state of these two factors is not "beautiful" and needs to be "improved".

Fuck you, National Geographic.

[The Lizard of Oz]

I just saw three gorgeous blends walk past me in the past 20 minutes.

A hapa about 20 year old (I'd guess white daddy Jap mommy) with the scary never-wrinkling Asian skin and an enraging juicy butt.

A shorty white/Latina blend, probably white/Puerto Rican with a sick ass (not a butt, an ass), maybe 23-24, and a perfect ohmygawd cocksucking mug.

A white/African Obama type blend (not white/African American, but white/African I'm 90% sure) with a tall, slim dancer's body, around 18. Big granny glasses accentuating the tightness of every hole.

I also saw some worthless whiter than white bitches with forehead already runneled at 23-25, badly distributed excess weight and parchment pale skin that can't even take a decent tan line.

It's like all that pussy was trying to troll this thread.

Dudes who want to sit around, whine, and indulge their forced miscegenation fantasies are welcome to do so. I'd rather be out on a spring day having my mind blown away and my sack painfully enlarged by these juiced American blends circa 2014.

[bacon]

The white race as Samseau brought up faces a much larger issue than racial mixing. The declining birth rates will be what drives whites into extinction first. Unless white women want to reproduce and white men have an incentive to procreate now, which they don't in the west, birth rates for whites will continue to dry up.

[Sombro]

I don't give a damn about actual races. (Culture is much more of a determinant.)
But the more people mix coupled with the more people have to racialize everything, in twenty years everyone will be even more neurotic.

[KorbenDallas]

Not going to happen. Not even worth talking about. The South has been almost half black for centuries yet there is no blend now, still mostly just black and white. One of my biggest regrets in life was not going out with a mixed black/white girl in middle school who really loved me. I was too much of an idiot to go out with her because....I was an idiot. Argg....

[BruceCreatine]

(04-12-2014 10:19 AM)bacon Wrote:  

The white race as Samseau brought up faces a much larger issue than racial mixing. The declining birth rates will be what drives whites into extinction first. Unless white women want to reproduce and white men have an incentive to procreate now, which they don't in the west, birth rates for whites will continue to dry up.

In London, working class white women seem to have more black babies than white babies.

[Days of Broken Arrows]

Reverse this focus of this piece of article. What if it said "In 30 years we'll all be white?"

That would be offensive. And that's the reason the article is bothersome as it's written: it assumes one trait is favorable over another. To use a liberal word, why can't both (gag) coexist? Why is one better than another?

Liberals complain about men objectifying women, but they objectify the human race, assessing people on only their most superficial qualities, as if they're drapes or a car.

All that said, I can't resist point out that someone's ex on this board (perhaps the proprietor) posted this on Facebook with the comment "Very cool." Hahahahahaha.

[Giovonny]

White people are going extinct!



I'm not worried.

Europe has been right next to Africa for thousands of years. Whites are still white.

Russia has been right next to Asia for thousands of years. Whites are still white.

The United States is right next to Mexico. Whites are still white.

Roosh is in Eastern Europe. Whites are still white.

*****

Most people will never breed outside of their race.

Don't let the media fool you!

#paranoia #fearmongering

[speakeasy]

(04-12-2014 09:17 AM)scorpion Wrote:  

Something for non-whites to keep in mind when considering this issue is the fact that white genes are recessive. What does this mean? Look at Barack Obama, who is half black and half white, and yet who looks black, self identifies as black, and is universally regarded as "the first black President". And rightfully so: the guy is clearly black.

I was going to bail out of this thread, but I have to reply to this because there is some stuff worth clearing up and you aren't alone in saying what you said above.

No, he is not clearly black, and certainly not rightfully so. Obama looks like exactly what he is, someone that is equal part European and equal part African. Because of the one-drop rule, Americans have a very diluted and distorted notion of what "black" is. Outside of America, Obama isn't considered black, he's considered mixed. Most the black Americans you see aren't full black. My grandfather who literally could pass for a white was considered "black" oddly.

I'll put Obama's picture next to a true black man, i.e. someone with 100% African genetics and you can clearly see that they don't even look like the same race.



Now this is a real black from south Sudan:


Side by side, the two men look nothing alike. In fact I'd say Obama looks closer to Caucasian than he does to this African soldier. These two don't even look like they belong to the same race. So if we are being technical about it, it's a bit silly to call them both black in the same sense. Once again let me emphasize, in America we have a very liberal notion of what a black person is that most countries don't share. Mixed people aren't considered black in England. In Brazil Obama would never be considered black. Outside of America black means you look like you could be from Africa. In America it means anything, even someone like Rasheeda Jones or Derek Jeter, either of which could pass for Italian.

Now do I refer to Obama as black? Yes. Because that's how most Americans will see him due to the legacy of the one-drop rule. And to a racist white, Obama is just another nigger. But I realize if I'm looking at this from a genetic standpoint, no he isn't black, he's mixed. And when put next to a black that isn't mixed, he all of a sudden doesn't look all that black at all.

One another thing I wanted to address because this gets thrown around a lot is the recessiveness of white phenotype. There's a lot of disinformation about genes and heredity. I'm assuming by white features, you are referring to things like white skin color, Caucasian facial structure, blonde hair and blue eyes. As it turns out none of these features are actually recessive. A recessive trait is one that involves a single gene which is expressed as either on or off. Racial features don't work this way since there area multitude of genes that determine any one racial feature such as skin color. If someone of pure black African and pure white European mix, the result will be intermediary, a caramel complexion like Obama. The same with facial features that are thought of as Caucasian or Negroid. These aren't dominant or recessive, results will be intermediary. Hair and eye color it's more complicated but it turns out blonde hair is not recessive. It's better explained here: http://genetics.thetech.org/ask-a-geneti...ive-traits

Quote:

It's also disingenuous to post pictures of models as being the standard look of mixed race people, especially when most of the models have white features.

I didn't say they were the standard. When Samseau said the ones featured were unattractive, Giovanny noted that they probably did that because of the audience that reads NG. I then noted that they just as easily could've chose more attractive examples of mixed race people and I provided some examples, since Samseau seems to think that mixing makes people ugly. I didn't say those models were "standard". The fact is mixed or not mixed, few people are extremely attractive. Though I would say on average, people with mixed heritage tend to be more attractive. And research shows that many agree: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/a...study.html

The reason behind this is that mixed people tend to be closer to the human mean. As we see with facial averaging studies, when you make a facial composite of averages, the first thing you note is how attractive these faces look. It's because you averaging out extreme features, those features that tend to make people unattractive.

Quote:

The pictures of the normal mixed race people in this thread are much more indicative of how they look, which clearly show a lack of white futures (again, due to the recessive nature of white genes).

If you don't see white features in any of those faces you aren't paying attention. Some of them merely look like Spaniards to me, for example the dude at the bottom right corner. The one woman with the grey hair doesn't even look mixed to me at all, she just looks like a regular white woman.

Quote:

The hypocrisy of non-whites here is astounding. Imagine me cheerleading in a thread and applauding a future without black people? Literally cheering for blacks to be bred out of existence. That would be extremely fucked up. Yet that is what this article is doing for whites, and people have no problem with it, and even defend it.

Look, you cannot breed out whites without also breeding out the race you are breeding them with. Just like you can't pour a bucket of black paint into a bucket of white paint without also diluting the pure black color and turning it into grey. So stop acting like this targets only whites. It doesn't.

And if America becomes mixed, so what? So what's the alternative? That we make it illegal to race mix? Bring back segregation? Short of doing that, you aren't going to stop people from marrying across color lines. Aren't there many more important things that define people than what they look like?

(04-12-2014 05:32 AM)BruceCreatine Wrote:  

Websites mainly written by white men, that espouse non-PC views about the world and society and you're surprised white nationalist are involved?

Being non-PC has nothing to do with it. And you didn't address my question and went completely around it. Since the main reason whites are disappearing is due to below replacement level fertility, wouldn't white nationalists aims be better met by encouraging whites to marry young and have large families? Why are white nationalists trying to have promiscuous lifestyles knowing that will lead to the destruction of their race?

Quote:

I'm more surprised that black men come on here than white nationalists.

I don't really go on any other manosphere sites than this one for the very reasons you point out. This one has some prominent black posters past and present and I feel more comfortable here than a place like Heartiste.

Quote:

Basically minorities can be proud of their side whereas white people are discouraged from doing so. White people have a lot of great history and being proud of being white is a good thing.

I couldn't care less if whites are proud of being white. So long as it's not based on hatred. But obviously "white pride" as such raises more skepticism because of the history. When blacks organized for their interests you got Martin Luther King. When whites organized for their interests you got Hitler.

[DjembaDjemba]

People should have sex with, marry, and breed with whomever they want to.

Unwarranted concerns by race biased folks will also always be a part of the scenery, like weeds in the garden.

60% of black men in the UK marry out of their race, are they committing genocide?

Answer: Keep it to yourself because outside the confines of political discussions it doesn't matter.