Very eye opening video from Stefan:
"Bunch of entitled bitches!"
Starts at 3:22
"Bunch of entitled bitches!"
Starts at 3:22
Deus vult!
Estrogen Based Parasites
I am a long time listener of Stefan Molyneux, and I really enjoyed this show. Very tough take on women. It is great that "red pill" knowledge is spread on such platform. They start reading a study(which I couldn't find right now) at 1:38:36 about how much women actually lie about shit, lie about serious life changing stuff, STDs etc. this shit makes one angry. Integrity and honor are male abstractions...
Stefan's episode " the truth about violence" is great too -- basically shows how much women hit their kids and not just kids, but BABIES. Women actually hit more their children than men but the whole discourse in the media is about how the womun are the victims of violence.
Stefan's episode " the truth about violence" is great too -- basically shows how much women hit their kids and not just kids, but BABIES. Women actually hit more their children than men but the whole discourse in the media is about how the womun are the victims of violence.
" Estrogen Based Parasites", AKA, a wife.
Take care of those titties for me.
I like listening to his podcasts, but he studiously avoids explaining how his anarcho-capitalist system would actually work, and he has a bad habit of deflecting to a different point when someone calls in and asks him a question along those lines. Similar to how socialism requires the existence of people willing to work hard for no material rewards (only seen in Star Trek, which is a less than realistic portrayal of humanity), anarcho-capitalism seems to require that people refrain from colluding to re-establish a monopoly on violent force, i.e. government.
That was quite interesting. He has a different take on things compared to a lot of the views here.
If only you knew how bad things really are.
I like Molyneux too. I listen to him all the time, but he does have major flaws The only possible way that his ideas will ever work is if every person in the entire world ignores that urge to use violence to take what they want or need.
Wow. Stefan put bitches on blast. I am a paid subscriber of his podcasts, and a long time fan. I've never heard him break this bad on broads, and manginas before.
"Feminism is a trade union for ugly women"- Peregrine
Warning Purple Pill Defense of Women:
I thought his admonition to not pay for sex is good, and helped me see that I sometimes do that unconcsciously.
But his advocacy of "equality" when he is a stay-at-home dad ( I believe he used this term to describe himself) and his wife a professional seems disingenuous.
Obviously, since women are disabled to some degree when they are in late pregnancy and doing infant care,
there is a legitimate need for extra care from _someone_during that time. It can be the State via taxes, or a husband or extended family.
In addition, my subjective impression is pregnancy can take more out of a woman than all but the most horrific jobs ( working in a mine for example) take out of a man (granted that most workplace deaths are men). Post partum depression has an incidence of about 50% , a friend of mine got it and she was really sick for about a year.
The "weaker sex" was an accurate stereotype.
He also oversimplified the problem of the student engineer who called, who clearly had problems with parent-pleasing, but the host redirected the conversation solely to his own agenda of framing women as parasites. The student agreed that the information was very useful, but there was more to his problems than that.
I read up on the host, and his wife appears to be some kind of licensed mental health professional who got in trouble for offering advice on his web site not using the legally required confidentiality or something similar. They subsequently took all references to her off the show, so it may be he has a high earning woman partially paying his way while he does child care and calls women "parasites". Interesting situation.
I think it's important for men not to go too far and start to vilify women in a witch-hunting fashion. That's what feminists did and look where we are. Each sex has its own challenges and each person is in a different situation. While the political and legal climate in the USA and First World has swung too far toward the presumption of moral superiority for women, that does not mean it makes sense to become pissed-off little complaining bitches like they have lollzlzlzlz.
"There's a high price to being right, you just might find a better deal being forgiving."
I thought his admonition to not pay for sex is good, and helped me see that I sometimes do that unconcsciously.
But his advocacy of "equality" when he is a stay-at-home dad ( I believe he used this term to describe himself) and his wife a professional seems disingenuous.
Obviously, since women are disabled to some degree when they are in late pregnancy and doing infant care,
there is a legitimate need for extra care from _someone_during that time. It can be the State via taxes, or a husband or extended family.
In addition, my subjective impression is pregnancy can take more out of a woman than all but the most horrific jobs ( working in a mine for example) take out of a man (granted that most workplace deaths are men). Post partum depression has an incidence of about 50% , a friend of mine got it and she was really sick for about a year.
The "weaker sex" was an accurate stereotype.
He also oversimplified the problem of the student engineer who called, who clearly had problems with parent-pleasing, but the host redirected the conversation solely to his own agenda of framing women as parasites. The student agreed that the information was very useful, but there was more to his problems than that.
I read up on the host, and his wife appears to be some kind of licensed mental health professional who got in trouble for offering advice on his web site not using the legally required confidentiality or something similar. They subsequently took all references to her off the show, so it may be he has a high earning woman partially paying his way while he does child care and calls women "parasites". Interesting situation.
I think it's important for men not to go too far and start to vilify women in a witch-hunting fashion. That's what feminists did and look where we are. Each sex has its own challenges and each person is in a different situation. While the political and legal climate in the USA and First World has swung too far toward the presumption of moral superiority for women, that does not mean it makes sense to become pissed-off little complaining bitches like they have lollzlzlzlz.
"There's a high price to being right, you just might find a better deal being forgiving."
For those that listened to this program, what do you think of his admonition to look for a "quality woman" (presumably in the 7-ish range) rather than chasing after 9s and 10s because of all the trouble that they bring with them? It's an interesting idea, that too much physical beauty may ruin a woman's character.
If only you knew how bad things really are.
^^^note that he is assuming the location is here within modern western culture / society.
If only you knew how bad things really are.
Quote: (03-30-2014 02:34 PM)RexImperator Wrote:
For those that listened to this program, what do you think of his admonition to look for a "quality woman" (presumably in the 7-ish range) rather than chasing after 9s and 10s because of all the trouble that they bring with them? It's an interesting idea, that too much physical beauty may ruin a woman's character.
I noticed that the 8+ chicks, or chicks that _thought_ they were 8+ were more unabashed about looking for "sponsors" , just getting paid to exist and be chicks in the Phils. The 7s and below seemed to emphasize their willingness to cook and their personal loyalty more as a way to keep you interested.
All the YoungTallCool guys have been pointedly telling me they don't get asked for money, so this may only be something old guys get hit with.
Quote: (03-30-2014 02:34 PM)RexImperator Wrote:
For those that listened to this program, what do you think of his admonition to look for a "quality woman" (presumably in the 7-ish range) rather than chasing after 9s and 10s because of all the trouble that they bring with them? It's an interesting idea, that too much physical beauty may ruin a woman's character.
Since (in western society) neither 9s and 10s nor 7s have enough quality character traits to be worth commitment, it is just a weak panacea. Would you rather have a super slutty and entitled 10, or just a moderately slutty and entitled 7? Or a quality woman who is a 3?
He incorrectly assumes that most men don't find quality women because of their own choices, whereas the reality is that there just aren't enough quality women for most men, making it quite meaningless what they're actually looking for.
It is a form of the "You just have to choose and everything will be fine" fallacy, such as when Lester in American Beauty decides to be happy by quitting his job and devoting himself to leisure, and still comes back to an enormous house filled with luxury.
"Imagine" by HCE | Hitler reacts to Battle of Montreal | An alternative use for squid that has never crossed your mind before
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)