I think the Olympics would be better if they had a mens Olympics and then a separate women's Olympics. I'm not saying women's athletics serves no purpose, I just don't think women's medals should be valued as highly as men's medals. This is illustrated by the fact that no one really cares who wins the most gold or most medals anymore. People just care about the individual events they're interested in. One example of this is the Russian people who would value winning gold in men's hockey and not winning anything else over winning the most medals, but not winning the gold in hockey.
Obviously, this won't change, but I do think it would be better to make the women's Olympics completely separate. Here is a link to the article that got me thinking about this. Women in Combat: a Prelude
Obviously, this won't change, but I do think it would be better to make the women's Olympics completely separate. Here is a link to the article that got me thinking about this. Women in Combat: a Prelude
Quote:Quote:
The Sochi Winter Olympics are providing a useful service in demonstrating the complete absurdity of the woman warrior meme:
Sarka Pancochova, a Czech snowboarder, led the slopestyle event after the first run. On her second trip down the course of obstacles and jumps, she flew through the air, performed a high-arcing, spinning trick and smacked her head upon landing. Her limp body spun like a propeller into the gully between jumps and slid to a stop.
Quote:Quote:
Pancochova was soon on her feet, and the uneasy crowd cheered. Her helmet was cracked nearly in half, back to front. She was one of the lucky ones, seemingly O.K., but her crash last week was indicative of a bigger issue: a messy collage of violent wipeouts at these Olympics. Most of the accidents have occurred at the Rosa Khutor Extreme Park, the site of the snowboarding and freestyle skiing events like halfpipe, slopestyle and moguls.
And most of the injuries have been sustained by women....
The Winter Games have always had dangerous events. But the Extreme Park, as the name suggests, is built on the ageless allure of danger. All of the events there have been added to the Olympic docket since 1992, each a tantalizing cocktail of grace and peril.But unlike some of the time-honored sports of risk, including Alpine skiing, luge and ski jumping, there are few concessions made for women.
For both sexes, the walls of the halfpipe are 22 feet tall. The slopestyle course has the same tricky rails and the same huge jumps. The course for ski cross and snowboard cross, a six-person race to the finish over jumps and around icy banked curves, is the same for men and women. The jumps for aerials are the same height. The bumps in moguls play no gender favorites.
“Most of the courses are built for the big show, for the men,” said Kim Lamarre of Canada, the bronze medalist in slopestyle skiing, where the competition was delayed a few times by spectacular falls. “I think they could do more to make it safer for women.”
Compare the sports with downhill skiing, in which women have their own course, one that is shorter and less difficult to navigate. Or luge, in which female sliders start lower on the track than the men. Or ski jump, in which women were finally allowed to participate this year, but only on the smaller of the two hills. The Olympics have a history — sexist, perhaps — of trying to protect women from the perils of some sports.
But equality reigns at the Extreme Park, even to the possible detriment of the female participants.
Actually, equality doesn't reign. Because the inferior and uncompetitive female athletes don't compete against the superior men. But the young women are such stupid herd animals that they will literally kill themselves in their incoherent denial.
"I see it every contest,” Cusson said. “Unless they are forced to hit the smaller side, the best ones will always go for the bigger jumps. They want to prove to everybody that they are capable. And then all the other girls will follow."
As usual, the end result of feminism is more dead and injured women. If one simply judges by the consequences, it should be obvious that feminists hate women far more passionately than even the most virulent misogynist.
They can't even compete in competitive leisure pastimes without half-killing themselves and requiring surgery, but they're going to hold their own in combat, where the enemy is actually trying to harm them?
