Quote: (02-07-2014 03:45 AM)SwayMe Wrote:
Quote: (02-06-2014 03:13 PM)Smooth Operator Wrote:
IMO comfort is besides time spend together, most and foremost build by being non-needy.
LOL, comfort means getting to know the other person better which also means exchange of passions and the feeling behind those passions. Non-needy is a frame of mind.
If that works for you, then good, whatever works man. There is not one style of seduction.
My game improved a lot when I quit this pattern: attraction -> comfort -> seduction (MM). Most of the attraction is already there through the dominance and confidence you exude, before you open your mouth to her, you only build further on the existing attraction. Then you escalate and further create sexual tension. I don't talk too much about myself, I like to have some intrigue, opening up simply kills sexual tension.
What is comfort? To you it is how much the woman knows about you. To me it is that the woman feels that you're a safe guy to have sex with, who knows what he is doing, and who won't bother her afterwards in a needy fashion. For that you must be non-needy (or have the frame of being non-needy as you say it) for a certain time (i.e. time spend together; can be very short).
So what if that's a frame of mind? A frame doesn't get translated into actions? A frame can't trigger feelings into a woman?
Quote: (02-07-2014 03:45 AM)SwayMe Wrote:
Quote: (02-06-2014 03:13 PM)Smooth Operator Wrote:
Qualification is not important, being high quality/value is.
Qualification is important. It makes her invest and defines the sarge. It falls into the category of compliance. Read Cialdini's book for this.
For SNLs it's helpful to use sexual qualifiers. This also reduces LMR.
Actions speak louder than words, IMO. But I know some guys who use sexual qualification, and it works for them.
Quote: (02-07-2014 03:45 AM)SwayMe Wrote:
Quote: (02-06-2014 03:13 PM)Smooth Operator Wrote:
But it's difficult to give advice with so little information. You say there was attraction, why do you think there was attraction? Was she really into you?
"Getting numbers are easy" this means he's got attraction in combination with the fact that he's good looking and approaches confidently.
Wrong. Getting a number doesn't always mean there is attraction! Even if she's not attracted, she can still give her number (real or not), just to get rid of you, just to get another orbiter giving her attention and validation with texts and calls, just because many women don't like to say "no" in your face, etc.
In the past I also got numbers and I thought that she was attracted to me because she was nice, smiling, laughing, even touching etc. Only after many lays I now know the difference between a good interaction and real solid attraction, whereby she's really into you.
Quote: (02-07-2014 03:45 AM)SwayMe Wrote:
Attraction is a fleeting emotion which is gone later on that's why the flake. To prevent this comfort and qualification.
If you want to know if you have enough attraction and can start building comfort use a large qualifier.
Wrong. That's another myth you can read on all seduction sites. You shouldn't take everything you read from a guru/PUA for granted. I thought the same in the past, because I read it somewhere. Now I know better. First of all, attraction is not 0 or 1, it's a range instead from 0 to 1. Attraction is fleeting when there just wasn't enough attraction. When she's really into you, the attraction will not go away that quickly.
My guest post on SwoopTheWorld:
Springbreak in Cancun