I'm simply making this thread to provoke thought; I think it'd make an interesting discussion. Before I start, I want it to be known that I, like many of you, also think radical feminists today hold poisonous, deranged views. Views that simply promote hatred of the male gender.
I don't know about america, but being a black male myself, here in the UK, if a black person is racist to a white person, it is nervously laughed off. If the reverse happens, all hell breaks loose. Similarly, if a female is sexist to a male, it is nervously laughed off. If the reverse happens, all hell breaks loose.
These double standards are a product of history. The slave trade and the oppression of women, more specifically.
A major obvious flaw in history being used to justify the blind eye to "reverse" racism or sexism (I use the term reverse very loosely), is that the initial perpetrators are simply not alive anymore. They want to blame a whole race/gender for a sin committed by their ancestors. But some feel as though it is the current generations job to cleanse their ancestors of their sins by almost trying to "make it up" to the ancestors of those oppressed. But where does it end?
My question is, to what extent do you feel that history can be used as a justification of society showing more leniency towards one race/gender in relation to being racist/sexist?
I don't know about america, but being a black male myself, here in the UK, if a black person is racist to a white person, it is nervously laughed off. If the reverse happens, all hell breaks loose. Similarly, if a female is sexist to a male, it is nervously laughed off. If the reverse happens, all hell breaks loose.
These double standards are a product of history. The slave trade and the oppression of women, more specifically.
A major obvious flaw in history being used to justify the blind eye to "reverse" racism or sexism (I use the term reverse very loosely), is that the initial perpetrators are simply not alive anymore. They want to blame a whole race/gender for a sin committed by their ancestors. But some feel as though it is the current generations job to cleanse their ancestors of their sins by almost trying to "make it up" to the ancestors of those oppressed. But where does it end?
My question is, to what extent do you feel that history can be used as a justification of society showing more leniency towards one race/gender in relation to being racist/sexist?