Hookup Effects on Teen Guys
Humans do what they have always done, adapt to their environment.
This is what happens when you have a generation of kids growing up hearing shit like gender is only a social construction and that guys and girls are the same. Teenage boy thinks: I'd love it if this girl came up to me and said, "I'd love to stick your dick in my mouth". So he logically assumes she'd love to hear him say, "I'd love to put my dick in your mouth". Then the girl goes and tells her teacher who sees it as evidence of rape culture and the cycle continues.
The imbeciles in the article can't decide if boys want love or sex. It is beyond their ken to see that a percentage of guys want sex and the rest want love because they know deep down they can't get just sex. They blame online porn for the girls putting all the goods in the shop window. They refuse to see that the girls have to offer it all to get the guys who want sex, not love. If only anyone, anyone at all, had ever written about these things, perhaps somewhere on the internet.
This is some pretty heavy shit.
You wanna solve this problem?
Start teaching parents to be parents again. Stop teaching sally that being a whore is ok. Stop letting her put half naked pictures on facebook and limit her media.
Start teaching billy to act like a gentlemen with balls. There is a way to get pussy and not be tasteless.
I realize that women are the rule makers of the game, so when they start acting like ladies, we'll act like gentlemen.
You wanna solve this problem?
Start teaching parents to be parents again. Stop teaching sally that being a whore is ok. Stop letting her put half naked pictures on facebook and limit her media.
Start teaching billy to act like a gentlemen with balls. There is a way to get pussy and not be tasteless.
I realize that women are the rule makers of the game, so when they start acting like ladies, we'll act like gentlemen.
You have to know how to read these articles. They're never just little stories of gee whiz, look how Johnny is texting these days. They have a point and this one comes to its point none too subtly:
The point is always the same: Johnny and Susie will come to some unspecified but all the more terrible harm left to their own devices (pun fully intended), therefore, they need to be indoctrinated in proper thinking and behavior by party line feminist and mangina commissars from the earliest possible age.
Quote:Quote:
The key to developing solid relationships lies partly in early education, said Steiner-Adair. To that end, some schools are launching classes focused on social and emotional issues, with teachers talking about gender, language, social media and healthy relationships.
The point is always the same: Johnny and Susie will come to some unspecified but all the more terrible harm left to their own devices (pun fully intended), therefore, they need to be indoctrinated in proper thinking and behavior by party line feminist and mangina commissars from the earliest possible age.
same old shit, sixes and sevens Shaft...
Step back and let me reframe this within the context of reality -- something these writers don't know about.
I spent 20-plus years in journalism. I saw how the stories got made. I wrote them myself.
As an example as to why this is bad reporting, I'll relate the episode about what happened when I was a high school intern at a newspaper and they used me for a source on a story about the huge, hysterical crisis of the moment then which was...DRUGS!!
They wanted to learn about the "drug problem" in local high schools. I told them there wasn't much of a problem (it was a good suburban district) and it was just a few outliers. They insisted in having me find them outliers and then proceeded to tell their stories about addiction and rehab in a SWEEPING DRAMATIC fashion more appropriate for a Lifetime movie than a newspaper.
The day after the cover story ran, people thought all teens had a "drug problem." But that wasn't the case at all.
What they missed were the other 99 percent of kids who were minding their own damn business, studying, maybe having a beer on occasion, but living normally. These people were by far the majority and all now live regular lives -- worthy of praise by not media-whore attention.
In the story you see here, the main source interviewed 1000 kids for her book. I'd like to know what the other millions of kids are doing. My guess is it's not this.
When the newspaper I wrote for ran the "drug" story, they made a "star" out of a media-friendly (i.e. blonde exhibitionist) druggie chick at my school. I had just overcome a near-death experience from a chronic illness and gotten into a good college and remember thinking "Why do all the shitheads get the attention, not me?"
I'm sure there are millions of hard-working good kids thinking the same thing about this book. When reading anything in the media, we need to realize it's not THE story, just the part they're choosing to tell.
I spent 20-plus years in journalism. I saw how the stories got made. I wrote them myself.
As an example as to why this is bad reporting, I'll relate the episode about what happened when I was a high school intern at a newspaper and they used me for a source on a story about the huge, hysterical crisis of the moment then which was...DRUGS!!
They wanted to learn about the "drug problem" in local high schools. I told them there wasn't much of a problem (it was a good suburban district) and it was just a few outliers. They insisted in having me find them outliers and then proceeded to tell their stories about addiction and rehab in a SWEEPING DRAMATIC fashion more appropriate for a Lifetime movie than a newspaper.
The day after the cover story ran, people thought all teens had a "drug problem." But that wasn't the case at all.
What they missed were the other 99 percent of kids who were minding their own damn business, studying, maybe having a beer on occasion, but living normally. These people were by far the majority and all now live regular lives -- worthy of praise by not media-whore attention.
In the story you see here, the main source interviewed 1000 kids for her book. I'd like to know what the other millions of kids are doing. My guess is it's not this.
When the newspaper I wrote for ran the "drug" story, they made a "star" out of a media-friendly (i.e. blonde exhibitionist) druggie chick at my school. I had just overcome a near-death experience from a chronic illness and gotten into a good college and remember thinking "Why do all the shitheads get the attention, not me?"
I'm sure there are millions of hard-working good kids thinking the same thing about this book. When reading anything in the media, we need to realize it's not THE story, just the part they're choosing to tell.
The boys who aren't ever banging chicks are the ones they really need to worry about.
Quote: (11-13-2013 12:01 AM)JimNortonFan Wrote:
You mean like Sodini, Holmes, Cho, and Lanza?
That would be quite a law firm.
same old shit, sixes and sevens Shaft...
The reality is those types pose a greater risk to society-at-large than the most misbehaved male who is getting chicks.
In HS, 80% of the girls are getting the D and 20% of the guys getting the P
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)