[bacon]

these athletes who play football earn millions of dollars. take football away from them what kind of work would they do? probably construction/movers/factory work which also is bad for your body. obviously NFL is not perfect but these guys are well compensated for their work. shit join the military and you might die or become disabled for 30k a year.

[Wargasm]

(10-08-2012 01:18 PM)Therapsid Wrote:  

(10-08-2012 12:46 PM)kdolo Wrote:  

"Some people will disagree with Kdolo's premise and thus reject his conclusion, but just because there isn't a grand scheme to feminize the nation doesn't mean its not happening.

No, that's pretty much exactly what I think..........."

And this is what I am trying to et you guys to understand. Theses things aren't "Just Happening.....".

They are being done. There are in fact powerful, influential, super wealthy people who do sit in rooms and decide that these types of things are going to be done. We have to try to be aware of this ......it is not random.

the feminization of US society is not random - it is part of planned agenda.

I agree with this. Likewise, do guys really believe its an accident or purely a product of market pressures and viewer demand that there's now a glut of sitcoms and reality shows with homosexual characters, promoting gay marriage and adoption, and the gay lifestyle as "The New Normal" or "The Modern Family"? Nope, it's a conscious decision shaped not just by advertising dollars but by the political preferences of the media elite and their desire to reshape society.

The media elite work for private companies, and these shows are profitable because millions of people choose to voluntarily watch them. There are also good shows like Mad Men and Archer with more masculine themes (though no modern show is completely devoid of feminist influence.)

Cultural norms are dead, religion is less popular now than ever. All thats left is the new religion of Diversity and the resulting moral posturing. If you don't appreciate fat women for their personalities or gay men for their charming flamboyance than you sir are a bigot and unfit to hold a job in the public sphere.

Some of us are smart enough to talk the pc talk and keep our red-pill wisdom to ourselves (and keep our jobs). Others can't handle the cognitive dissidence and solve the problem by actually changing their views. Women aren't the only gender with a hamster, a rationalization hamster helps people get along with each other.

Ideas spread throughout a society like genes flow through a population. Groups that adopt the beneficial ones succeed and rise to the top.

[j r]

(10-08-2012 12:46 PM)kdolo Wrote:  

"Some people will disagree with Kdolo's premise and thus reject his conclusion, but just because there isn't a grand scheme to feminize the nation doesn't mean its not happening.

No, that's pretty much exactly what I think..........."

And this is what I am trying to et you guys to understand. Theses things aren't "Just Happening.....".

They are being done. There are in fact powerful, influential, super wealthy people who do sit in rooms and decide that these types of things are going to be done. We have to try to be aware of this ......it is not random.

the feminization of US society is not random - it is part of planned agenda.

What you're saying is basically a form of sociological creationism. It's just like the other kind of creationism. Some people look around at this world and decide that it couldn't have evolved from random and disparate forces and, therefore, had to be created by some higher power.

Unfortunately, both forms of creationism are based in a very fundamental misunderstanding of how the world works. Yes, very powerful people often get together and make plans. Presidents of nations meet with CEOs and with other presidents. The top names in economics and finance meet every year at Davos. There's the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Group and plenty of other similar meetings. Influential people want to meet and talk with other influential people, just like doctors want to talk to other doctors or lawyers or insurance salesmen or dentists or whatever.

If you said that every year the most powerful and influential dentists in the country get together to plot the future of dentistry, you wouldn't be wrong. You'd just be describing a dentists convention.

If you want me to believe that there is anything more going on, you're going to have to show me some actual proof and not just random "connect the dots" speculation.

[Timoteo]

Here's a whining feminist's take on the NFL Pink Campaign:

http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/a-yel...-1.1182077

Oddly enough, the author of this article, Maura Kelly, writes for women's mag Marie Claire, and made a blog post expressing disgust at the characters on "Mike and Molly," because she doesn't want to see fatties be intimate:

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment...e-1.193075

[MidniteSpecial]

If it makes you feel better only 5% of the proceeds actually go to breast cancer.

[reaper23]

(10-02-2012 08:49 PM)bacon Wrote:  

singledadswag you let your son wear pink? what kind of father does that? you think you have to emasculate yourself to support a cause? go ahead but i just hope you spare your children the shame of having to wear pink.

i'm wearing a pink shirt right now and I can tell you I look bad ass.

there is no shame in wearing pink in the right setting.

[bacon]

ONLY 8% OF MONEY FROM PINK NFL CLOTHING GOES TO CANCER RESEARCH

Quote:

for every $100 in pink merchandise sold, $12.50 goes to the NFL. Of that, $11.25 goes to the American Cancer Society (ACS) and the NFL keeps the rest. The remaining money is then divided up by the company that makes the merchandise (37.5%) and the company that sells the merchandise (50.0%), which is often the NFL and the individual teams.

Then consider that only 71.2% of money the ACS receives goes towards research and cancer programs.

In the end, after everybody has taken their cut, only 8.01% of money spent on pink NFL merchandise is actually going towards cancer research