[TheRookie]

All too often, a man who raises the ire of the feminist lobby quickly recants his heresies and grovels in order to regain his public reputation. My thinking is that if these men know there are fellow men who support free thought and inquiry of unpleasant truths and taboo issues, then these men will be more likely to stand their ground.

Dr. David Samadi recently meekly wondered if perhaps women pay higher health care insurance because they have more health issues, and healthy women are more likely to waste insurance money with checkups at the doctor than healthy men. Is he right? I don't know. But it is an interesting topic to investigate, no? Not according to the feminists. Here are Dr. Samadi's twitter mentions:

https://twitter.com/search?q=%40drdavidsamadi

This one is nice:

Quote:

@drdavidsamadi You are a douchebag. Stop practicing medicine immediately as it is dangerous to treat patients when you are missing a brain.

In reality, Dr. Samadi is an excellent doctor who is saving the lives of men with prostate cancer with a high rate of success.

I sent Dr. Samadi a note of encouragement and he appreciated it. He is truly baffled at how he has stirred up a hornet's nest and been branded across the forehead as a "sexist."

The purpose of this thread is to post the stories of men who touch on or fully advocate red pill ideas and post their contact info to give them words of support and encouragement.

To start, feel free to contact Dr. Samadi:

Email: http://www.roboticoncology.com/contact/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SamadiMD
Twitter: https://twitter.com/drdavidsamadi

[Sonsowey]

The problem here is he's really just shilling for insurance companies who want any excuse to charge anyone they can as much as possible.

The American healthcare system is great at making a profit, bad at providing healthcare.

In this instance charging any group of people more for reason X is really immoral. We should be getting to a universal healthcare system like every civilized country has, which in every case costs less than the mess we have, which only serves to limit care provided and fatten the pockets of a few at the top.

So sorry, getting feminists mad doesn't mean someone's automatically right.

He may be a fine doctor but as a "medical expert" being put on TV you can bet he's getting money from someone to voice these views.

[Damedius]

(08-29-2013 01:13 AM)Sonsowey Wrote:  

The problem here is he's really just shilling for insurance companies who want any excuse to charge anyone they can as much as possible.

The American healthcare system is great at making a profit, bad at providing healthcare.

In this instance charging any group of people more for reason X is really immoral. We should be getting to a universal healthcare system like every civilized country has, which in every case costs less than the mess we have, which only serves to limit care provided and fatten the pockets of a few at the top.

So sorry, getting feminists mad doesn't mean someone's automatically right.

He may be a fine doctor but as a "medical expert" being put on TV you can bet he's getting money from someone to voice these views.

If he's right and you agree with his message, what difference does it make?

He didn't create the system, blaming him for the current state of Health Care is a bit of a stretch.

[It_is_my_time]

Women already did pay more than men. Thanks to Obamacare, all of us men will be paying more to make sure we now pay as much as women. So thanks to Obamacare, men now pay MORE to subsidize women. More of the Democratic party supporting feminists.

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

The point is that he should be supported because he drew the wrath of feminists because he dared to criticize anything about women, not because his proposal was somehow inaccurate or bad policy. While I'm not sure if we should support him as his issue is quite multiple-sided, we definitely should keep it in mind for all future cases as TheRookie said.

[The Beast1]

(08-29-2013 01:13 AM)Sonsowey Wrote:  

The problem here is he's really just shilling for insurance companies who want any excuse to charge anyone they can as much as possible.

The American healthcare system is great at making a profit, bad at providing healthcare.

In this instance charging any group of people more for reason X is really immoral. We should be getting to a universal healthcare system like every civilized country has, which in every case costs less than the mess we have, which only serves to limit care provided and fatten the pockets of a few at the top.

So sorry, getting feminists mad doesn't mean someone's automatically right.

He may be a fine doctor but as a "medical expert" being put on TV you can bet he's getting money from someone to voice these views.

Doctors are paid by how many patients they see in a given day.

Samadi is not apart of the problem. Direct your anger towards HMOs, your congress critter, and the black guy in the oval office.

[Ocelot]

(08-29-2013 01:13 AM)Sonsowey Wrote:  

The problem here is he's really just shilling for insurance companies who want any excuse to charge anyone they can as much as possible.

The American healthcare system is great at making a profit, bad at providing healthcare.

In this instance charging any group of people more for reason X is really immoral. We should be getting to a universal healthcare system like every civilized country has, which in every case costs less than the mess we have, which only serves to limit care provided and fatten the pockets of a few at the top.

So sorry, getting feminists mad doesn't mean someone's automatically right.

He may be a fine doctor but as a "medical expert" being put on TV you can bet he's getting money from someone to voice these views.

Everyone is charged more when insurance companies aren't allowed to discriminate based on inherently different risks. Case in point is car insurance - young men are higher risk drivers to insure than other demographics because, on average, they are involved in more road accidents. When the EU made it illegal for insurance companies to discriminate based on gender, what happened? The cost of women's driving insurance rose to the same level as men's (to the chorused whining of European feminists as they got exactly what they asked for).

On universal healthcare - as someone who lives in a country with such a system, all I can say is the reality (at least in the UK) doesn't live up to the utopian vision the left try to sell. The system is so overburdened that hospitals have, for years now, been adopting what's called the "Liverpool Pathway". It basically consists of drugging patients out of their minds and then starving/dehydrating them to death.

[Therapsid]

(08-29-2013 08:48 AM)Ocelot Wrote:  

On universal healthcare - as someone who lives in a country with such a system, all I can say is the reality (at least in the UK) doesn't live up to the utopian vision the left try to sell. The system is so overburdened that hospitals have, for years now, been adopting what's called the "Liverpool Pathway". It basically consists of drugging patients out of their minds and then starving/dehydrating them to death.

Fuck, I just looked the Liverpool Care Pathway up. This is unbelievable:

Quote:

"Hundreds of thousands of people have been put on the Liverpool Care Pathway since it was developed in the late 1990s...

It was supposed to alert clinicians to not just a dying patient’s physical problems but their emotional, social and spiritual needs in their final hours and days.

But it has faced a storm of criticism, with relatives not told that loved ones had been placed on the LCP, and the guidance misinterpreted by some hospitals so that patients were even denied water.

In November last year ministers ordered an independent review into its use after it was revealed up to 60,000 patients die on the LCP each year without giving their consent.

A third of families are also kept in the dark when doctors withdraw lifesaving treatment from loved ones.

The pathway involves withdrawal of lifesaving treatment, with the sick sedated and usually denied nutrition and fluids. Death typically takes place within 29 hours.

Records from 178 hospitals also show that thousands of people on the pathway are left to die in pain because nurses do not do enough to keep them comfortable while drugs are administered."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...z2dNgUs3XE

But right, tea-party types in America are "crazy" for suggesting that Obamacare will create death panels.

[Dusty]

A big part in how Obama won his 2nd term was saying men have to pay for women's birth control.

It was all set up. They had Stepanopolus ask a question about birth control at one of the R debates to tee it up.

Then the whole Sandra Fuck whining about her birth control.

It worked, O got an overwhelming majority of the single woman vote.