Posts: 253
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2012
Old School Red Pill - Briffault's law
07-28-2013, 06:51 AM
Same goes for a man, if a man knows he will get no benefits for sure from a woman, he is not going to communicate with her(although there is a faint possibility, he will do it).
Same with business or a lot of things. Yeah, woman certainly influences the conditions of the family, that is because they make babies and limited eggs. But elite males have a lot of control though.
Posts: 1,264
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation:
16
Old School Red Pill - Briffault's law
07-28-2013, 11:53 PM
It's interesting to see this dynamic play out with people who become terminally Ill, become vegetables, or become maimed in some way (Like war vets). I've heard a few stories in my area (a military area) of guys who'd stuck by their wives sides in the darkest of days only for that devotion not to be reciprocated. It sucks when it starts to look like women almost exclusively are driven on base, primal instinct, yet we're suppose to conduct society in a 'civilized' manner where we're all equals and above the animal inside us.
I read a little more about this law, and how he mentions that children were more likely to be raised by uncles than the fathers. I suspect this is due to the fact that when your sister has kids, there is some assured genetic relationship, whereas you might not be related to the offspring of a female you had sex with.
Civilize the mind but make savage the body.
Posts: 9
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2013
Old School Red Pill - Briffault's law
07-29-2013, 06:55 PM
Quote: (07-28-2013 06:51 AM)avantgarde Wrote:
Same goes for a man, if a man knows he will get no benefits for sure from a woman, he is not going to communicate with her(although there is a faint possibility, he will do it).
Yes, but with men, sometimes the only benefits they see are sex.
Posts: 268
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
3
Old School Red Pill - Briffault's law
07-29-2013, 11:09 PM
Classic law.
Let's throw in a few corollaries. These are not mine; I can't take credit for them. Bit accurate though. Basically saying - all that matters is what's in the now, they aren't thinking long-term here.
- Past benefit by the male does not provide for future or continued association.
- Any agreement where the male provides a current benefit in return for a promise of a future association is null and void as soon as the male provides the benefit.
- A promise of future benefit has limited influence on current/future association, with the influence inversely proportionate to the length of time until the benefit will be given and directly proportionate to the degree to which the female trusts the male.
Posts: 2,036
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation:
42
Old School Red Pill - Briffault's law
07-30-2013, 07:18 AM
Quote: (07-28-2013 11:53 PM)nek Wrote:
It sucks when it starts to look like women almost exclusively are driven on base, primal instinct, yet we're suppose to conduct society in a 'civilized' manner where we're all equals and above the animal inside us.
yeah, it sucks bigtime..and it sucks even more when governmental/legal and societal forces team up to make it easier for women to act on these base primary insticts and at the same time make it incredibly difficult and financially punitive for men to leave marriages, even when they are completely in the right to do so
2015 RVF fantasy football champion