rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


Body Describer Table Chart
#1

Body Describer Table Chart

Not sure if you guys had seen this.

http://www.taglol.com/meme/girls-body-sizes/9363/

[Image: 1367523864.jpg]

The point of modern propaganda isn't only to misinform or push an agenda. It is to exhaust your critical thinking, to annihilate truth.
- Garry Kasparov | ‏@Kasparov63
Reply
#2

Body Describer Table Chart

Yea the problem is that girls in categories 4,5,6 prefer to use the title curvy.

They can't seriously think they are tricking us...
Hamsters...
Reply
#3

Body Describer Table Chart

Like most guys I'm sure, I prefer 2, 3, and 8's, but I don't mind a 0 or 4. Not a fan of muscular, but I wouldn't say no.

Vice-Captain - #TeamWaitAndSee
Reply
#4

Body Describer Table Chart

Man, some of the comments from ugly broads just reinforce what I've always said. Sexism and objectification are things that only ugly broads care about.

"Feminism is a trade union for ugly women"- Peregrine
Reply
#5

Body Describer Table Chart

2,3,8 I'd approach during the day.

1,4 only at night.

I might be interested in a 5 at some point, just for some variety, especially if she has a cute face.

0,9 get me drunk and tell me I'll never have sex again unless I do her, and I'll give it a go.

6 lose 100 pounds then we'll talk.

7 how haven't you died from a heart attack yet?
Reply
#6

Body Describer Table Chart

4s are good to go if that extra weight goes to their ass rather than the gut.
Reply
#7

Body Describer Table Chart

Quote: (06-27-2013 08:13 PM)Gopher Wrote:  

4s are good to go if that extra weight goes to their ass rather than the gut.

Yeah, but then they'd be 3s and not 4s.

#NoSingleMoms
#NoHymenNoDiamond
#DontWantDaughters
Reply
#8

Body Describer Table Chart

^^ agreed
Reply
#9

Body Describer Table Chart

Quote: (06-27-2013 08:13 PM)Gopher Wrote:  

4s are good to go if that extra weight goes to their ass rather than the gut.

Some women the SIZE of the 4 pictured aren't "flabby" but are just more muscular than average women, I like them.
Reply
#10

Body Describer Table Chart

My "FAT" alarm goes off a lot sooner than 6, lol. I'd call 4 and 5 fat as well. 3 is curvy, but the problem is that bitches who resemble 5 think curvy applies to them.
Reply
#11

Body Describer Table Chart

I prefer between 3 and 5

Said she only fucked like 4 or 5 niggas so you know you gotta multiply by three
Reply
#12

Body Describer Table Chart

When i was in high school everybody was skinny.

So: Number 0 anytime.
Reply
#13

Body Describer Table Chart

2,3, or 4 although 2 is a little too skinny (ribs visible) and 4 a tad heavy. A girl needs some body fat for successful childbearing.

If only you knew how bad things really are.
Reply
#14

Body Describer Table Chart

3 is my fav all day long and I wouldn't be ashamed in the least to be tapping 4.
Reply
#15

Body Describer Table Chart

Except for the Fat #6, they are all wearing bikinis. Most women past a certain age cannot even wear a two-piece bathing suit. Even the "chubby" model is merely thick, and the "flabby" one is distinctly above-average for her age. The others are mostly runway lingerie and swimsuit models, literally "10's" who earn hundreds of thousands of dollars to show their bodies.
Reply
#16

Body Describer Table Chart

2-4 for me is the ideal range with 0 and 1 being way too skinny. 8 maybe, 9, thanks I'm not into dudes. An occassional 5 when the lighting is favorable? Why the hell not! :]
Reply
#17

Body Describer Table Chart

Number 4 can call herself "curvy" and not be lying. Number 5, if it's distributed right and doesn't have cellulite, can still get hit. Number 3 is my ideal, but 2, 8 and 9 can also get some.

"The best kind of pride is that which compels a man to do his best when no one is watching."
Reply
#18

Body Describer Table Chart

I can do 3 and 4 and easily be seen in public with them. I could bang 5 but wouldn't be caught with her as my gf

A man is only as faithful as his options-Chris Rock
Reply
#19

Body Describer Table Chart

Am I the only one who prefers 5 to 4? In order I'd take 3, 2, 8, 5, 4, 1, 0. The others don't pass the boner test.

I'd rather have a girl be in shape or shapely but not in between. I think 6 and 7 might as well be in the same category - unbangable but there are a lot that of different shapes between 5 and 6.
Reply
#20

Body Describer Table Chart

In order of preference: 3, 2, 5, 4, 8, 0, 1. No Fakkin way: 6, 7, 9
Reply
#21

Body Describer Table Chart

2.5 [Image: smile.gif] I had no idea so many people would post on this.

I was actually looking to find my TYPE and I'd say 2.5

The point of modern propaganda isn't only to misinform or push an agenda. It is to exhaust your critical thinking, to annihilate truth.
- Garry Kasparov | ‏@Kasparov63
Reply
#22

Body Describer Table Chart

I'm a 2/3 man.

But I'm not gonna lie....

If my test levels were in a spike and I hadn't been watching porn and it was gonna be a total no-hassle, sure thing....Would bang a 4 or 5.
Reply
#23

Body Describer Table Chart

Clearly a lame white guy made this - you can't see any ass in these photos.

Also, athletic comes in lots of different forms. Most athletic girls I meet are not as lean as the girl pictured; they'll have a little extra fat that enhances their feminine appeal, and often muscular legs with a phat ass. Yoga girls, for instance, are definitely not that lean or mannish looking.

'Muscular' girls like that are extremely rare, unless you're hanging around female bodybuilders or something.

[Image: athletes.jpg]

[Image: athletes04.jpg]

[Image: athletes10-med.jpg]

My favorite kind of athlete:




Reply
#24

Body Describer Table Chart

Quote: (06-27-2013 07:14 PM)xmlenigma Wrote:  

Not sure if you guys had seen this.

http://www.taglol.com/meme/girls-body-sizes/9363/

[Image: 1367523864.jpg]

Since this posting was referred to in another thread, I cannot help but to comment that I find all of these body types are potentially bangable, except for 6 & 7, and part of the bangability of each of them would depend on the face. Certainly 3 is preferred; however, part of the bangability of each of these is that they generally are in o.k. shape and look o.k. in a two piece bathing suit.

On the other hand, this table seems to be very incomplete and to leave out a large number of female body types that i frequently seem to be witnessing in the USA, and it especially seems that there are a lot of types in the USA that would fit in some arena between 5 & 6, or types of women that have no tits or have saggy tits, have belly fat or tit fat, even happening while a girl is still in her 20s - an American woman phenomenon?
Reply
#25

Body Describer Table Chart

2/3 is preferred. But would bang also 1,5&8 if its an easy shot and I'm thirsty.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)