[void]

http://www.popsci.com/science/article/20...attractive

I am for plane t-shirts, but if you want to wear a print-shirt, try one with a big T on it. I assume a big V or triangle would work in a similar way to highlight your hip to shoulder ratio.

[Therapsid]

(06-27-2013 12:50 AM)void Wrote:  

http://www.popsci.com/science/article/20...attractive

I am for plane t-shirts, but if you want to wear a print-shirt, try one with a big T on it. I assume a big V or triangle would work in a similar way to highlight your hip to shoulder ratio.

Why the devil do science reporters bother to write up stories like this without even including a goddamn link to the original study? Even if only the abstract is free it should be linked to.

[Ensam]

(06-27-2013 12:56 AM)Therapsid Wrote:  

Why the devil do science reporters bother to write up stories like this without even including a goddamn link to the original study? Even if only the abstract is free it should be linked to.

Drives me nuts too. A lot of times the studies haven't been published yet - or even submitted. That means the findings of the studies haven't even been verified by outsiders. I've stopped reading popular science magazines because they're basically all garbage.

[void]

(06-27-2013 12:56 AM)Therapsid Wrote:  

(06-27-2013 12:50 AM)void Wrote:  

http://www.popsci.com/science/article/20...attractive

I am for plane t-shirts, but if you want to wear a print-shirt, try one with a big T on it. I assume a big V or triangle would work in a similar way to highlight your hip to shoulder ratio.

Why the devil do science reporters bother to write up stories like this without even including a goddamn link to the original study? Even if only the abstract is free it should be linked to.

could be a invented article. but the idea alone is good