[Caligula]

This Daily Mail article leads with how, according to a study, 16 per cent of women have been victims of men trying to interfere with their birth control to force them into pregnancy. This is probably a real phenomenon and is of course reprehensible behaviour.

However, the figures don't add up. Is this the new frontier in the feminist agenda? Anecdotally women are more likely to engage in 'reproductive coercion' - I wonder if cuckolding is included in these figures.

The article includes numbers from the CDC which suggest that women are almost twice as likely to trick men into having kids with them. Again, the study doesn't even mention cockolding which probably boosts the figures.

"About 8.7per cent of men reported having a partner who tried to get pregnant against their wishes in the 2010 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention survey." - according to the same survey 4.8% of women had experienced the same thing.

"Dr Lindsay Clark, said: 'I was very interested in looking at the question of why our patients get pregnant after we have performed contraception counseling.'" - a laudable goal, but did they take into account the variable known as hamster?

Here's the article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...egacy.html

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

Yep, it's another area where female plight is panicked over, while male is ignored. The same goes for so-called economic violence, where one partner criticizes another's use of personal or joint finances or leeches from them or has to hide their own purchases so not to be criticized.