rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


Alphas>Women>Betas>Omegas: A Theory
#1

Alphas>Women>Betas>Omegas: A Theory

I initially posted this as a reply to my Fatso thread, but I realized it was best suited for a separate thread as I am looking for some feedback. Most importantly, if some of you players are good with evolutionary biology/psychology to comment on the biological aspects of sexual attraction and hypergamy.

Let me set out this theory. We live in a narcissistic society that is female-dominated – by heterosexual females. You see this in feminist circles with the bitter fights over beauty standards, careers and relationships between men and women. Dyke feminists could care less about hetero women getting the dick they want – they just don’t want to be judged for being ugly and unfeminine. They may try to pretend they care about “female oppression” of beauty standards, but they really just want to change them for their gay benefit. Women’s beauty standards are not just driven by male sexuality, but competition for alphas. Somewhere in the past, some women shaved their armpits, men found it attractive and other women had to start to compensate for the changes in the SMP.

Let’s lay it out – alphas>women>betas>omegas.

Alphas don’t have to be narcissists, but they do have some of those qualities because of being so privileged by female sexual adoration. Betas are thirsty, but let’s set those dudes aside for a minute as with omegas.

What women think they want is equality with alphas. They want to have their money get dicks hard, they want their snark and independence to make alphas salivate to for them. They want to work beside them in high status professions – think Boston Legal and Grey’s Anatomy. They want crowds of fans rocking out to their live music. They want adoring alphas wearing their sports jerseys and come to their games and cheer when hit the trey. The issue here is twofold.

First is the approval they get is beta/omega male and female approval. Women appreciate female approval on a superficial level, but they know it is often fake and is so ubiquitous that is boring and expected. As for betas, let’s set them aside as they are settling material. Omegas are repulsive not just sexually but are a reflection of dark days for the hamster. Every modern female has thrown herself at some retreating alphas, offering up her body as a salve to failing relationships. They will do anything sexually and will often spend way too much time on him or cough up great amounts of money for him. I knew a woman that wanted to save this dude and spent all her saving on rehab. He came back clean for about two months but then went back to drinking and beating her.

This applicable to omegas because the rank desperation reminds them how unattainable alphas often are for them – omegas sometimes a reflection of a woman’s position visa vie alphas. Further, they remind of the lengths they would go for alpha approval.

The other problem is the fact that alphas and men are not sexually turned on my provisioning ability, confidence or social status generally. To me, a good-looking woman who is intellectually interesting is a plus for me. That Sasha Alexander chick from Rizzoli & Isles is hotter than hell to me. Looks have to come first, intelligence after. Going forward, women are often bitter and disappointed because alphas don’t care about their gains.

However, women haven’t become alphas, they became the betas they settle for. Back on track, the other issue is that if women get what they claim and get this approval from alphas, they often lose attraction to the alpha. Imagine some alpha husband wearing WNBA player’s jersey on the regular – where to you think the arc of that relationship is headed? Sure it is possible he has just that much hand, but it isn’t probable.

Let’s talk about SMV as it relates age and weight. The pool of alphas is fairly steady. The marriageable ones and the one's that will marry will dwindle quickly. Women at 35 are likely to find a 50 year old divorced alpha with no desire to father more children. Which brings in age. Women are often forced to consider beta males as mates as they age – nothing new here. Same thing with weight gain – it alters the landscape of men who will fuck them and wife them.

Which is the narcissistic exposure here. When confronted with the reality that have the mentality of a beta male or omega coupled with their increasing inability even to bed lesser alphas, the hamster spins out of control. You get later in life lesbians, single mothers, women flying to Haiti to bed young black dick. Think Stella Got Her Groove back situation. Unable to come to grips with reality, the hamster runs away.

If it does not, it needs serious attention to make a beta male attractive. Facebook helps as she can claim her dude is different and is a real man because he cuddles with her and confesses his deepest fears to the hamster. What he doesn’t know is he is setting up a codependent/compensatory narcissist relationship with the woman.

The woman will sleep with the beta, romance him and make him feel loved. She acting out the beginning of relationships with alphas before they bounce. The engagement is a huge candy bar for the hamster to gnaw on while the hamster’s blood is starting to boil. It starts to come out as a Bridezilla situation, with beta comforting her and reassuring her that he loves her. She fucking knows that that’s why she is marrying you – she can control you knowing you need her more than she needs you. The wedding will be a calm before the hamster storm that is coming once the honeymoon ends. The beta will think the wedding stress was the cause of the problems.

The marriage will go downhill quickly. Sex will dry up and she will increasingly critical. She will demand declarations of love and eternal bondage (worship). She will begin to only treat him well in public and being to treat him like dirt in private. She will often use sex as a weapon and physically slap him. Unable to comprehend the problem is his lack of alphatude, he will blame himself, beating himself for not being supportive enough, not listening to her.

Look at that the shit website Askmen.com It is one massive beta indoctrination program. Women need to know men are reading that, in the vain hope alphas will become more beta and betas stay beta so they have a dude to settle with.

Let’s wrap this up. The utilitarian approach women take to men have biological roots, but understand it is blown up by poor American psychology. Alphas have serious privilege and women resent it. The sexual revolution for them has been a large negative. Huge plus in college and right after, but women quickly realize it is bad that society doesn’t force alphas and greater betas into marriage. Notice the constant preening rhetoric of how important the gains are for women. Yay careers! Yay not having to get married! Ha – that is little more than the hamster grooming itself in order to convince themselves that this whole scheme has been a net positive for them. It hasn’t and, as usual, alphas benefit.

Quote:Old Chinese Man Wrote:  
why you wonder how many man another man bang? why you care who bang who mr high school drama man
Reply
#2

Alphas>Women>Betas>Omegas: A Theory

Another solid post.

I've been using many of your points and examples in conversations with people.
Reply
#3

Alphas>Women>Betas>Omegas: A Theory

^^ ditto. Excellent theory.
Reply
#4

Alphas>Women>Betas>Omegas: A Theory

I respect Omegas more than Betas.

Think of 'Comic Book Guy' on the Simpsons. To me a guy like him who becomes obsessed with his own little world - has more balls than a Beta who is desperately trying to 'nice' his way into a chick's pants.

Indeed - the one thing that Alphas and Omegas have in common is that trying to please women is not important to them. So - in some sense - I feel it is easier for an 'Omega' to develop 'Alpha' traits than it would be for a 'Beta'.

As always - apologies for the overuse of the Alpha, Beta, Omega terms. It is just a handy shorthand. I know it is annoying to see these cliches used over and over.
Reply
#5

Alphas>Women>Betas>Omegas: A Theory

2Wycked,
Do you have a blog?
If not, why not start one?
Reply
#6

Alphas>Women>Betas>Omegas: A Theory

Quote: (05-30-2013 01:24 AM)cardguy Wrote:  

As always - apologies for the overuse of the Alpha, Beta, Omega terms. It is just a handy shorthand. I know it is annoying to see these cliches used over and over.

I'm a Sigma
Reply
#7

Alphas>Women>Betas>Omegas: A Theory

Feminism is essentially predicated on this idea you point out, that women are envious of the status and privileges enjoyed by alpha men. The error inherent in feminism is that it erroneously ascribes the privileges of alpha males to apply to all men, hence the term patriarchy. It speaks to the utter invisibility of betas and omegas in the eyes of women: to them, the idea of a "man" is inherently an alpha man. Men who do not have high status or alpha traits simply blend into the background.

And so it is that feminists clamor for access to the boardroom, which they claim is a male dominated sphere. Of course, they ignore the fact that the janitor's closet is also a male dominated sphere, and want nothing to do with it.

[size=8pt]"For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.”[/size] [size=7pt] - Romans 8:18[/size]
Reply
#8

Alphas>Women>Betas>Omegas: A Theory

Quote: (05-30-2013 12:15 PM)scorpion Wrote:  

Feminism is essentially predicated on this idea you point out, that women are envious of the status and privileges enjoyed by alpha men. The error inherent in feminism is that it erroneously ascribes the privileges of alpha males to apply to all men, hence the term patriarchy. It speaks to the utter invisibility of betas and omegas in the eyes of women: to them, the idea of a "man" is inherently an alpha man. Men who do not have high status or alpha traits simply blend into the background.

And so it is that feminists clamor for access to the boardroom, which they claim is a male dominated sphere. Of course, they ignore the fact that the janitor's closet is also a male dominated sphere, and want nothing to do with it.

In the same way, feminists fought for sexual liberation for women and to an end to slut-shaming, thinking that men had always enjoyed the freedom to sleep around.

But of course, they simply ignored the beta and omega masses who rarely or never have sex. When this is pointed out, at best they lamely point out the tiny handful of women in the same position.
Reply
#9

Alphas>Women>Betas>Omegas: A Theory

At risk of sounding like a complete douche I'd like to point out that this is a hypothesis not a theory.
Reply
#10

Alphas>Women>Betas>Omegas: A Theory

So is feminist theory which should be correctly labeled the Feminist Hypothesis.

It's a good critical look at it. Honestly, men do a better job at answering the question, "what women want" better than women. That should tell you a lot right there.
Reply
#11

Alphas>Women>Betas>Omegas: A Theory

Quote: (05-30-2013 12:15 PM)scorpion Wrote:  

And so it is that feminists clamor for access to the boardroom, which they claim is a male dominated sphere. Of course, they ignore the fact that the janitor's closet is also a male dominated sphere, and want nothing to do with it.

In patriarchal societies all janitors are women. I've lost count of the times a woman janitor got an eyeful of my dick while meticulously cleaning around the pissoir at the same time I was using it. And they often looked as they would merrily shine your knob as part of their shitty workplace duty. Women there really know their place; cooking, cleaning, nurturing - that's all there is to them.
Reply
#12

Alphas>Women>Betas>Omegas: A Theory

Your post and scorpion's addition are sublime and I will definitely be using them if anyone wants to discuss feminism with me. Brilliant, I love this forum so much.

[Image: grouphug.gif]

Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats. - H L Mencken
Reply
#13

Alphas>Women>Betas>Omegas: A Theory

Yes, woman resent the beta's but they join the ratrace the betas are in. The alphas already won the ratrace.

Feminism and the empowerment of woman is just a control thing the alpha's use to keep the rest of mandom in their place and under their control.
Reply
#14

Alphas>Women>Betas>Omegas: A Theory

Great post. You should absolutely try to post some of your stuff on ROK.
Also this goes in line with the idea that if there are two women and two men, only one of the men is necessary to produce the maximum amount of babies. The other is unimportant. Thus you get the alpha, the important guy who gets both women, and the beta, the guy who gets neither woman. The alpha is more important than any individual woman but the women are more important the non-reproducing beta.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)