[Teedub]

Two interesting articles from the New York Daily News - and what these articles say we knew all along.

Quote:

Married men who cook and clean have less sex than their counterparts who focus on more traditionally masculine tasks, like yard work and paying bills, according to new research. This suggests ‘the importance of socialized gender roles for sexual frequency'.

http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/he...-1.1251047

Quote:

A new study of married couples reveals that women are more aroused by the sight of her husband mowing the lawn, taking out the trash, or fixing a flat than performing so-called “woman’s work.”

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national...-1.1251454

Obviously we knew this to be true, its evident in the (too) often mentioned alpha/beta debate. Women, ESPECIALLY feminists, desire these traits hugely, but don't want to say this as it will encourage the undesirable betas to 'learn' to be like this. They hate this. For the same reason as they hate the manosphere and game in general. They want only 'naturals'.

[storm]

Quote:

A new study of married couples reveals that women are more aroused by the sight of her husband mowing the lawn, taking out the trash, or fixing a flat than performing so-called “woman’s work.”

I'm surprised women are aroused by men doing housework of any sort whatsoever.

Looks like it's time to pioneer Lawnmower Game

old related post http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-20186.html

[Hannibal]

Somewhat related. I apologize in advance because country music isn't very good, but it illustrates the point.

Also, roissey had an article about it some time ago.

http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/01/3...-sex-free/

I don't know if it's correlation or causation, though. Do women become attracted when a man does manly work and she must then do the housework, or is it because a woman who's sufficiently attracted to her man will do whatever to please him? I think this door swings both ways.

[Teedub]

(02-03-2013 09:36 AM)Hannibal Wrote:  

I don't know if it's correlation or causation, though. Do women become attracted when a man does manly work and she must then do the housework, or is it because a woman who's sufficiently attracted to her man will do whatever to please him? I think this door swings both ways.

I think its something primal. Something about manly work being more 'providing' rather than nurturing, that makes it attractive to women when they see a man performing it. In the same way I'm attracted to a woman baking cakes with children (I used to house-share with a girl who looked after some kids for a few hours and she was always making stuff with them. She was one of the only girls I've ever felt deep affection for and it gives me hope such girls still exist in the Anglosphere. She was middle class and from a conservative-leaning background - private school etc - think it had a difference. Less left wing bullshit than state schools etc) I think women find men 'fixing' things and creating things attractive.

The only time I do not think woman find it attractive is when it is being done for her by a beta orbiter or friend-zoned man. I'm not sure why though, as you'd think biologically ANY man doing it would be slightly attractive?

[placer]

I think it's rather interesting how the left-leaning Slate magazine handled this study (Link: http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/201...s_sex.html). From their article:

Quote:

Some will read these generalizations and cry, “Sexism!” or “Essentialism!” So let’s be clear about what these group comparisons mean. I am talking about statistical averages, not absolutes. Clearly, not all men and women embody the stereotypes of their sex

In other words, the author knew this study would drive the feminist and "white knight" hamster in overdrive (An observation: A lot of those "white knights" are gay men; for someone who has probably never dealt with LMR or ASD, or has dealt with women's strange detachment between what they say they want and what they really want in a man, straight men can seem pretty irrational when it comes to sex), and put this paragraph in to brace for impact.

[Naridimo5]

I recon doing the dishes and most domestic chores wouldn't give so much self gratification either..
A man's place is the DIYs.. If you're a complete handy many in the house then your partner can fantasise about you being the Plumber or the construction who gives her a hard fucking and properly gets her pipes all cleaned when you're done..

[Timoteo]

Again, this is one of those things women complain about - that men don't help out enough with the household chores. However, the reality is they just want something to complain about, because if you do too much of this household work, they don't see you as a man. Which is why, as others have stated previously here, you shouldn't pay too much attention to what women say. The moment your woman starts complaining about some chore you're not doing...PULL YOUR DICK OUT.

[Sabra]

Wifey's chores:
- Cooking
- Cleaning
- Laundry
- Dishes

My chores:
- DIY fixes around the house
- Auto maintenance
- Occasionally help out with dishes
- Pay bills

Guess we're gonna be alright.

[Surreyman]

(03-29-2013 06:07 AM)placer Wrote:  

I think it's rather interesting how the left-leaning Slate magazine handled this study (Link: http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/201...s_sex.html). From their article:

Quote:

Some will read these generalizations and cry, “Sexism!” or “Essentialism!” So let’s be clear about what these group comparisons mean. I am talking about statistical averages, not absolutes. Clearly, not all men and women embody the stereotypes of their sex

This is so fucking stupid. Of course it's a statistical average, ITS A SURVEY!!! WHAT ELSE COULD IT BE OTHER THAN AN AVERAGE?!!

Why would you assume the results of this study were supposed to be relevant to every woman? Why would you think that's what the study was saying? It's about the majority of women, not the broken ones who trawl left wing website comment sections.

Stupid Marxist drones. I get so tired of these 'liberal' types thinking they're so enlightened, when all they do is just parrot ideas they barely understand.

[speakeasy]

I posted this maybe a month or two ago. Teedub is like my British counterpart, Lol. Gotta meet this bloke one day.

[Teedub]

(05-12-2013 02:10 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

I posted this maybe a month or two ago. Teedub is like my British counterpart, Lol. Gotta meet this bloke one day.

I too posted this 2 months ago, well 3 actually, check the date for the original post. Haha! Indeed mate, the feeling is mutual my friend, lets keep educating folks on Latinos, Latin American racial demographics and shit in general. If you're ever in England, give me a shout!

- I even gave you a shout out in the freestyle rap thread. I knew we were a duo even back then.