I'm usually sceptical of the average newspiece posted here on the forum because they are usually badly sourced or the conclusions drawn from them are heavy handed. All the more surprised was I thus to see the following article in Time Magazine and supported on their Twitter feed.
The sample size of 4500 is impressive and so big that individual variations are largely irrelevent
http://healthland.time.com/2013/01/30/wh...ut-on-sex/
The sample size of 4500 is impressive and so big that individual variations are largely irrelevent
http://healthland.time.com/2013/01/30/wh...ut-on-sex/
Quote:Quote:
In what feels like a blow to egalitarianism, new research finds that husbands and wives who assign housework along traditional gender lines have more sex than those who split the chores more equitably.