[Caligula]

The articles below describe a deliciously ironic argument where one group of nutters turns on another group of nutters, each trying to out-perform the other in political correctness.

It's funny to see feminists who have spent their lives worshipping at the altar of self-delusion be viciously attacked by fellow progeny of the very ideas they spent their careers pushing. Each shouting at the other I'm more progressive than you!

As the PC attack dogs come out to punish these feminists for their thoughtcrimes, hopefully they're thinking shit, we've created a monster!. A government minister, no less, is apparently calling for the sacking of the editor of the Observer newspaper where the piece appeared. Of course, it would probably be ideologically inconsistent for these feminists to find any fault with censorship in principle.

http://order-order.com/2013/01/14/have-c...have-nots/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...storm.html

The feminists in question resent men becoming women and claiming 'female privileges'. Her resentment is telling: if women were truly underprivileged, they should applaud men cutting off their cocks and joining their ranks. Instead, they complain!

This is hamsterism and intra-liberal ideological warfare at its finest.

Edit: maybe the author of the original piece is resentful because she gets mistaken for a tranny:

[Andy_B]

(01-14-2013 06:56 PM)Caligula Wrote:  

The articles below describe a deliciously ironic argument where one group of nutters turns on another group of nutters trying to out-perform one another in politically correct cant.

This is the inevitable outcome of identity politics. The more irrelevant "rich straight white males" become, the more that different "oppressed" groups will need to fight with each other over increasingly dwindling territory. And as more and more money moves away from the West toward Asia where political correctness has no power, the pie that these groups will be fighting over will get smaller and smaller, so expect these "intra-oppressed" battles to get more and more intense as time goes on.

[Shamrock]

are we sure that's not Al Gore?

[UgSlayer]

Quick: Who would you rather fuck if you had a gun to your head? Burchill or the tranny pictured in the article who won the tranny pageant?

[Timoteo]

Burchill definitely has one of those faces where you would wonder if she was born male. And some of those trannies DEFINITELY can fool you. However, under threat of the bullet to the head, I'd fuck the hard looking natural female.

[ghostdog]

I question the legitimacy of transgenders. still I always thought that feminists hated trannies because IF the confusion is all genetic then that means gender is innate.

[Faust]

If you put the two of them side by side and said "Guess the tranny!" I would probably guess wrong.

[UgSlayer]

(01-14-2013 07:34 PM)Timoteo Wrote:  

Burchill definitely has one of those faces where you would wonder if she was born male. And some of those trannies DEFINITELY can fool you. However, under threat of the bullet to the head, I'd fuck the hard looking natural female.

I didn't expect anyone to answer, but I definitely respect that you put yourself out there and did answer it. No disrespect meant at all. Question was a joke inspired by this:

Warning: It is an audio clip of Opie and Anthony on XM radio with guest Ricky Gervais discussing would they rather suck a trannies dick or fuck a woman that looks like a man. It includes a slide show of what the two look like. Youtube safe so no dicks. It is also hilarious.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQ-6oVWAUBc

I'm not embedding the video. If you click the link, you will understand why. Remember: you've been warned.

Another one that is pretty hilarious on Jay Mohr's podcast

This one is safer to embed.

[soup]

Excellent thread.

There is a huge conundrum in the feminist argument, and it centers around whether or not you believe in the existence of gender.

A lot of feminists and lesbians will argue that it is a social construct, and that men and women are essentially the same. This is in many ways the seed of their entire movement. Of course feminists don't really care about anybody but themselves, and the hardcore ones don't believe in equality and are essentially hypocritical fascists using the the idea of equality in machiavelian way to fulfill their own agenda.

Then there are transsexuals who feel so strongly about the gender binary, that they are eager to go through surgery to change their sex. You've got to love these jokers- they piss everyone off.

You can't have it both ways!

I'll be laughing my way to poosy paradise while this plays out.

I'm waiting for the trannys who start as women, and convert to men, and then get all red-pill and start blogging in the manosphere. Then the shit will really have hit the fan haha.

[Timoteo]

Wow...that Bailey Jay/Buck Angel question is basically having NO option. I might have to opt for the bullet. I'm not sucking dick, and the other option is to fuck a man with a pussy. Both are devastating options. Now if you give me a third option - fucking the chick with a dick in the ass, I could do that and not be fucked up afterwards. So long as I don't have to give her a reach-around.

[UgSlayer]

I can't help but laugh at gender politics, especially nowadays. These "researchers" write academic papers pushing their personal, convoluted, subversive, ass-backwards views. They have a conclusion in mind even before researching, and pick and choose sources written in the same fucked manner to try to prove that point. They end up talking in circles and disagreeing with each other.

I took a gender studies class to fulfill a humanities requirement and my instructor (a gay man) gave me a D on a paper that was tediously researched and cited (scientific journals that included neuroscience and human biology) that argued against gender being fully socially constructed. I argued that the foundations of gender are biological, and that society constructs ideas of gender around biological sex. I thought it was a good middle ground. I missed one class. Most other students would ditch it weekly. I would read every article and participate. 90 percent of the class that did show up wouldn't even read the assigned articles. When I saw my grade, I was furious, to say the least.

But then I realized that nothing that I could do or say would get through to an ideologue who was so stuck in his beliefs. Nothing would it get me an A in the class except a written version of his lectures. He didn't want conversation. He didn't want critique. He didn't want real world examples. He wanted to push his political agenda on us. I wasn't going to fuck my GPA. I would still critique his views from a red pill point of view during class, but my papers were basically word for word what he said during his lectures. I thought I was going to get at the highest a C+ or a B, but when I checked my grade online, I saw that I got the A. Yet, instead of feeling proud, I felt shameful and defeated.

[ColSpanker]

Know the feeling well.
Took a social psychology class twelve years ago. It was taught by a battle ax feminist who felt it was her duty to expand our conscious. I hated every minute of it and felt like a whore for telling her what she wanted to hear to get a "B". Never took another psych class again. I figured if the university allowed someone so bat shit crazy to teach, it wasn't getting my coin.

(01-14-2013 09:36 PM)UgSlayer Wrote:  

I can't help but laugh at gender politics, especially nowadays. These "researchers" write academic papers pushing their personal, convoluted, subversive, ass-backwards views. They have a conclusion in mind even before researching, and pick and choose sources written in the same fucked manner to try to prove that point. They end up talking in circles and disagreeing with each other.

I took a gender studies class to fulfill a humanities requirement and my instructor (a gay man) gave me a D on a paper that was tediously researched and cited (scientific journals that included neuroscience and human biology) that argued against gender being fully socially constructed. I argued that the foundations of gender are biological, and that society constructs ideas of gender around biological sex. I thought it was a good middle ground. I missed one class. Most other students would ditch it weekly. I would read every article and participate. 90 percent of the class that did show up wouldn't even read the assigned articles. When I saw my grade, I was furious, to say the least.

But then I realized that nothing that I could do or say would get through to an ideologue who was so stuck in his beliefs. Nothing would it get me an A in the class except a written version of his lectures. He didn't want conversation. He didn't want critique. He didn't want real world examples. He wanted to push his political agenda on us. I wasn't going to fuck my GPA. I would still critique his views from a red pill point of view during class, but my papers were basically word for word what he said during his lectures. I thought I was going to get at the highest a C+ or a B, but when I checked my grade online, I saw that I got the A. Yet, instead of feeling proud, I felt shameful and defeated.

[scorpion]

It's no surprise that deep down feminists have nothing but loathing for male-to-female transgenders.

Why?

Because a man who is so fucked in the head that he cuts his own dick off and starts wearing dresses and whatnot is the lowest value biological male possible. MtF transgenders make your average basement dwelling, virginal omega male look like Silvio Berlusconi in comparison. And feminists, despite their ideology, cannot fight biology. The repugnance they feel toward transgender MtFs is visceral and deeply rooted.

Basically, a woman views a transgender MtF with the same horror that a man views a woman who kills her own children: a person so fundamentally fucked in the head that they represent the lowest possible biological mate value through their actions.

[RandalGraves]

A circular firing squad of liberal nonsense?

[Sombro]

[Teedub]

(01-14-2013 07:02 PM)Andy_B Wrote:  

(01-14-2013 06:56 PM)Caligula Wrote:  

The articles below describe a deliciously ironic argument where one group of nutters turns on another group of nutters trying to out-perform one another in politically correct cant.

This is the inevitable outcome of identity politics. The more irrelevant "rich straight white males" become, the more that different "oppressed" groups will need to fight with each other over increasingly dwindling territory. And as more and more money moves away from the West toward Asia where political correctness has no power, the pie that these groups will be fighting over will get smaller and smaller, so expect these "intra-oppressed" battles to get more and more intense as time goes on.

That was fantastically well observed and I think you're right.

(01-14-2013 09:36 PM)UgSlayer Wrote:  

I can't help but laugh at gender politics, especially nowadays. These "researchers" write academic papers pushing their personal, convoluted, subversive, ass-backwards views. They have a conclusion in mind even before researching, and pick and choose sources written in the same fucked manner to try to prove that point. They end up talking in circles and disagreeing with each other.

I took a gender studies class to fulfill a humanities requirement and my instructor (a gay man) gave me a D on a paper that was tediously researched and cited (scientific journals that included neuroscience and human biology) that argued against gender being fully socially constructed. I argued that the foundations of gender are biological, and that society constructs ideas of gender around biological sex. I thought it was a good middle ground. I missed one class. Most other students would ditch it weekly. I would read every article and participate. 90 percent of the class that did show up wouldn't even read the assigned articles. When I saw my grade, I was furious, to say the least.

But then I realized that nothing that I could do or say would get through to an ideologue who was so stuck in his beliefs. Nothing would it get me an A in the class except a written version of his lectures. He didn't want conversation. He didn't want critique. He didn't want real world examples. He wanted to push his political agenda on us. I wasn't going to fuck my GPA. I would still critique his views from a red pill point of view during class, but my papers were basically word for word what he said during his lectures. I thought I was going to get at the highest a C+ or a B, but when I checked my grade online, I saw that I got the A. Yet, instead of feeling proud, I felt shameful and defeated.

The problems of the modern leftist education system. Its not education, its teaching you to repeat what you've been told using decent prose and punctuation. I know David Icke is a nutjob with his reptilian stuff, but he's right about one thing. Society has become one run by what he called 'repeaters'!