Feminism varies from country to country and so does its effects on game/behavior. There are a few perspectives on why this occurs, a popular one is this: different waves due to feminist leaders changing the course of feminism etc.
My take on it is pretty simple. Anglo feminism has a radical component because they view men as aggressors. They view men as aggressors due to the ratio of the country: single attractive females per single male.
A brief history of American Women
1950s - It's 1950s in America, a few feminist theorists are harping in the background, the men are back from the war, and Elvis is singing on the radio.
1960s - A sex revolution is imminent, drugs, parties, and sex is no longer sold with the precondition of a marriage certificate. Feminists are raging on in the streets. This is a pivotal moment. Now that monogamy is faltering, sex isn't confined and distributed by "men", it is now decided by the free market of sex, which is determined by which people are "in demand".
Women will always be the controllers of sex, unless we have a dramatic male shortage of Russia in the 90s and early 2000s. Men are naturally polygamous; also, the dating range for men is typically 18-35, where as for women its 18-28, so demographics/nature of the sexes clearly are favorable to women.
1970s - Corporate america, processed foods which make everything appear delicious, mcdonalds, etc etc.. the obesity economic weighs in.
1980s - Mass media, supermodels, large distribution of pornography, sex marketing etc.
When we look at the 70s, the economic pool of 18-28 year old nubile women has been sliced significantly by a younger generation that grew up more obese. So you had a slimmer 30 year old population, gaming a smaller pool of attractive women. Fertility rates are also decreasing, which ensures there's more 30 year old men gaming a smaller batch of 20 year old women.
The 80s glamorized sex/perfection and created this augmented reality of Gordon Gecko swindling women after crunching numbers and ruling the world. As women watched cinema, and saw those unrealistic alpha males on screen, they placed themselves in the shoes of the subject (the female character) and thus replicating similar emotional responses felt by these hypothetical characters: http://www.mindupdate.com/2007/04/weekly...r-neurons/
This enhances the ego and expectations of women, causing a spike in the price of sex, and causing men to up their standards in game.
1990s - Obesity increases, shortage of nubile single females, continues. Enter the tech-era, the beginnings of porn -- cost of sex goes down, but men fall victims to Erectile dysfunction (go check up "Big Porn Experiment" on youtube)
2000s - The beginning of augmented reality where women can use the internet to collect "orbiting" beta males who follow and sexually validate them. Women, through evolution, have been programmed to desire attention and validation for the purposes of ensuring their optimal time to mate. But because they have these new validation channels, they're finding fixations on validation rather than sexuality in itself. Cost of sex increases drastically.
Male immigration for skill visas. Developing countries like india, eastern europe, asia send males to anglo hubs for work because they're not feminised enough to send women. Drastically increasing the competition for women.
Vicarious roleplaying through film, music clips, stars, see notes on mirror neurons. Cost of sex increases drastically. Dating pool of single nubile females shortened due to obesity at an all time.
2010s - Combine all those effects, but look at it from a feedback effect. When the slim 22 year old good looking girl gets ridiculous amounts of attention, the probability of her putting on weight, having a shitty personality, not taking care of herself, not being a desirable marriage candidate INCREASES DUE TO COMPLACENCY causing a smaller pool of desirable females and a feedback effect.
SHE SIMPLY DOESN'T HAVE TO TRY TO LOOK GOOD. When there are many men offering her their numbers, asking her out on dates, she is empowered for this very reason alone, and can choose to wear flip-flops, because of her status in the market, not because feminism told her so. This is a misconception.
My take on it is pretty simple. Anglo feminism has a radical component because they view men as aggressors. They view men as aggressors due to the ratio of the country: single attractive females per single male.
A brief history of American Women
1950s - It's 1950s in America, a few feminist theorists are harping in the background, the men are back from the war, and Elvis is singing on the radio.
1960s - A sex revolution is imminent, drugs, parties, and sex is no longer sold with the precondition of a marriage certificate. Feminists are raging on in the streets. This is a pivotal moment. Now that monogamy is faltering, sex isn't confined and distributed by "men", it is now decided by the free market of sex, which is determined by which people are "in demand".
Women will always be the controllers of sex, unless we have a dramatic male shortage of Russia in the 90s and early 2000s. Men are naturally polygamous; also, the dating range for men is typically 18-35, where as for women its 18-28, so demographics/nature of the sexes clearly are favorable to women.
1970s - Corporate america, processed foods which make everything appear delicious, mcdonalds, etc etc.. the obesity economic weighs in.
1980s - Mass media, supermodels, large distribution of pornography, sex marketing etc.
When we look at the 70s, the economic pool of 18-28 year old nubile women has been sliced significantly by a younger generation that grew up more obese. So you had a slimmer 30 year old population, gaming a smaller pool of attractive women. Fertility rates are also decreasing, which ensures there's more 30 year old men gaming a smaller batch of 20 year old women.
The 80s glamorized sex/perfection and created this augmented reality of Gordon Gecko swindling women after crunching numbers and ruling the world. As women watched cinema, and saw those unrealistic alpha males on screen, they placed themselves in the shoes of the subject (the female character) and thus replicating similar emotional responses felt by these hypothetical characters: http://www.mindupdate.com/2007/04/weekly...r-neurons/
This enhances the ego and expectations of women, causing a spike in the price of sex, and causing men to up their standards in game.
1990s - Obesity increases, shortage of nubile single females, continues. Enter the tech-era, the beginnings of porn -- cost of sex goes down, but men fall victims to Erectile dysfunction (go check up "Big Porn Experiment" on youtube)
2000s - The beginning of augmented reality where women can use the internet to collect "orbiting" beta males who follow and sexually validate them. Women, through evolution, have been programmed to desire attention and validation for the purposes of ensuring their optimal time to mate. But because they have these new validation channels, they're finding fixations on validation rather than sexuality in itself. Cost of sex increases drastically.
Male immigration for skill visas. Developing countries like india, eastern europe, asia send males to anglo hubs for work because they're not feminised enough to send women. Drastically increasing the competition for women.
Vicarious roleplaying through film, music clips, stars, see notes on mirror neurons. Cost of sex increases drastically. Dating pool of single nubile females shortened due to obesity at an all time.
2010s - Combine all those effects, but look at it from a feedback effect. When the slim 22 year old good looking girl gets ridiculous amounts of attention, the probability of her putting on weight, having a shitty personality, not taking care of herself, not being a desirable marriage candidate INCREASES DUE TO COMPLACENCY causing a smaller pool of desirable females and a feedback effect.
SHE SIMPLY DOESN'T HAVE TO TRY TO LOOK GOOD. When there are many men offering her their numbers, asking her out on dates, she is empowered for this very reason alone, and can choose to wear flip-flops, because of her status in the market, not because feminism told her so. This is a misconception.
