Earlier today, Roosh posted the video below in his Twitter feed. These are American girls dancing on one of those music TV shows in 1969. Ever since I saw it, it's had my hamster going at a million. I've watched five times, even though it fills me with a melancholic feeling I can't entirely describe.
I could write paragraphs about it, but I don't need to with this group.
Quick Observations:
1. No tattoos.
2. Thin, even skinny.
3. Longer hair (on average).
4. Natural and sexy (but unskanky) look.
5. Subtly feminine aura that's near-impossible to describe.
6. Better music.
A purple piller might say: "Well, Tuthmosis, those are hand-picked chicks for the TV show." What would we respond? It's not like when you walked out of that studio you had a bunch of Adeles and Anal-Tattoo Broads walking on the street, and these were the only 11 girls like this. This may not have been typical, but it was common.
A skeptic would say, "You're just romanticizing the past. There were other draw-backs--like prudishness." That could be true, but I can't help but think, like Roosh muses, "I would have been more than happy" with this arrangement. Certainly more--or in a more meaningful way--than I am with the current crop.
It's an interesting historical moment for guys with our sensibilities too: right in the midst of the so-called "sexual revolution," and the advent of second-wave feminism. Was this the best time to be a man? Slightly liberated chicks, but not yet ruined. Or, is this, in fact, the beginning of the long ascent that we find ourselves at the bottom of? Or, is it something else entirely?
Let's discuss.
I could write paragraphs about it, but I don't need to with this group.
Quick Observations:
1. No tattoos.
2. Thin, even skinny.
3. Longer hair (on average).
4. Natural and sexy (but unskanky) look.
5. Subtly feminine aura that's near-impossible to describe.
6. Better music.
A purple piller might say: "Well, Tuthmosis, those are hand-picked chicks for the TV show." What would we respond? It's not like when you walked out of that studio you had a bunch of Adeles and Anal-Tattoo Broads walking on the street, and these were the only 11 girls like this. This may not have been typical, but it was common.
A skeptic would say, "You're just romanticizing the past. There were other draw-backs--like prudishness." That could be true, but I can't help but think, like Roosh muses, "I would have been more than happy" with this arrangement. Certainly more--or in a more meaningful way--than I am with the current crop.
It's an interesting historical moment for guys with our sensibilities too: right in the midst of the so-called "sexual revolution," and the advent of second-wave feminism. Was this the best time to be a man? Slightly liberated chicks, but not yet ruined. Or, is this, in fact, the beginning of the long ascent that we find ourselves at the bottom of? Or, is it something else entirely?
Let's discuss.