I came to check out RooshV again (think I forgot about stumbling across it before) because of this March 13th 2012 video this lady made about him:
In it she mocks the SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center) for labeling him as a misogynist simply for making pick-up guides.
It appears that many major media sources also called out the SPLC for their ridiculous feminazi-pressured viewpoints:
http://radicalhub.com/2011/10/04/radical...t-century/
http://reason.com/blog/2012/03/09/the-so...r-is-now-w
http://www.businessinsider.com/civil-rig...sex-2012-3
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/11/hbc-90001573
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/10...35174.html
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/293...-krikorian
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/in...r-on-women
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/in...-the-sites
I guess I was wondering about Roosh and his fans' opinion on this. Is the SPLC misogyny-labelling a bad thing because of the condemnation, or is it potentially a good thing because of the free press and advertising it has resulted in?
I think it attracts the curious who can then make up their own minds for themselves based on the writings.
IMO the concept of a 'hate fuck' for particular people is not misogynistic. I think one could only take bang guides as being misogynistic if EVERY instance of sex with woman was hateful in nature. That we go out of our way to specify a 'hate' fuck implies that those not labelled with the adjective 'hate' are not considered to be inherently hateful.
In it she mocks the SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center) for labeling him as a misogynist simply for making pick-up guides.
It appears that many major media sources also called out the SPLC for their ridiculous feminazi-pressured viewpoints:
http://radicalhub.com/2011/10/04/radical...t-century/
http://reason.com/blog/2012/03/09/the-so...r-is-now-w
http://www.businessinsider.com/civil-rig...sex-2012-3
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/11/hbc-90001573
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/10...35174.html
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/293...-krikorian
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/in...r-on-women
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/in...-the-sites
I guess I was wondering about Roosh and his fans' opinion on this. Is the SPLC misogyny-labelling a bad thing because of the condemnation, or is it potentially a good thing because of the free press and advertising it has resulted in?
I think it attracts the curious who can then make up their own minds for themselves based on the writings.
IMO the concept of a 'hate fuck' for particular people is not misogynistic. I think one could only take bang guides as being misogynistic if EVERY instance of sex with woman was hateful in nature. That we go out of our way to specify a 'hate' fuck implies that those not labelled with the adjective 'hate' are not considered to be inherently hateful.
