Quote: (11-11-2012 11:59 AM)Moreless Wrote:
Quote: (11-11-2012 09:06 AM)Kitsune Wrote:
Another one already mentioned is "Outliers" by Gladwell. Holy shit is that a bad book. Be born in the right place at the right time (Blue Pill) Work Hard (Blue Pill) Take What Opportunities Come (Blue Pill) , Be passionate about what you do. (Blue Pill.) It is also pseudo-science at it's very best.
Did you read the book?
The book wasn't about "this is how to become successful and awesome." It was about cultural statistics. It explains why certain races crash planes more. Why being born in certain months could give you an advantage on being a pro athlete in life. Why certain people are successful because of the 10,000 hour rule.
pseudo-science? I thought the book did a very good job of explaining the outliers. The chapters were set up like this:
-Story about amazing person doing something great because it just happened (Blue Pill - also feels like a fairy tale)
-The authors research on why this person or thing happened
Example: Bill Gates creates a business and works hard to achieve his results. If you work hard too you may achieve the same results? The author then explains that Bill had access to a computer many years before computers were the normal. He had programmed on the computer for 10k hours or more before actually building his empire. So.. 10k rule, plus being in the right place and time gave him the advantage to program his operating system like a god before anyone had time to catch up to him.
It's an interesting read.
The book is "Red Pill" because it shows you a beautiful car. Then explains what's under the hood and how dirty and complex the machine REALLY is.
Just like when a girl sees me she thinks, "he is really good at talking to women. He is also very fit and stylish!"
What the girl doesn't know is that I work in a hospital and converse with 95% women 40 hours a week and spend my free time at the gym. I also spend more time than the average male picking out my clothes.
The girl does not want to know these things though. She wants me to be a natural alpha who will give her the Disney fairy tale she was promised from birth.
Yeah, but like all books of a similar nature, it suffers from huge confirmation bias. Everyone who is successful in the world follows this same pattern... except the ones who don't.
For instance, the book uses The Beatles because they revolutionised rock music. They went to Hamburg and performed for a million hours a day and brought something new to the table etc.
That is fine, except off the top of my head, bands/musicians that are in the same league as far as financial success and redefining music which
didn't follow that blueprint are: Elvis, The Beegees, Led Zepellin, Madonna, Queen, etc. etc.
That isn't even including bands which are in the same league of success but didn't contribute by being innovative in the same way: The Rolling Stones, Any of the hair metal/hard rock bands of the 80's, Michael Jackson, so on and so forth.
It also doesn't include any bands that are more innovative than The Beatles who don't have the same success: This includes anyone involve in electronic music, heavier music, progressive music. etc.
The fact is, the Outliers theory works - until it doesn't. The months of the year thing is weak as shit when you think of it objectively. "Most successful sports stars are born in the first three months of the academic year." Well, no shit. Probably a quarter of all people are born in those months.
Derren Brown did a show called "The System" about confirmation bias with a random sample of people betting on horse racing. It works the same way as the faulty logic behind Outliers.
I wrote a similar thing about 48 laws of power somewhere on this forum: It is easy to say, "Woah, look at how all these rules apply to all these figures!" Of course they do, because it is the will of the author that the data will fit the theory.