[56merc]

http://jezebel.com/5852666/sex-on-the-fi...ional-fuck

Here are some quotes from the story. This cat sounds like he could be a RVF member:

Quote:

He made me laugh. One drink turned into two, two neighborhood bars into three, and when he kissed me in the street, I was elated.

Quote:

As he walked me to the train, he asked me if I would come over for a nightcap. Just one. He offered to pay for a cab to take me home afterwards, as I had to work early.

Quote:

But the way my date kissed me up against the brick wall outside the subway stop was enough to convince me my internal voice was an antiquated Debbie downer, squawking nonsense irrelevant for the modern woman.

Quote:

I went to his house. We headed straight to the bedroom. Sex — intense, unexpected, rough and satisfying. Afterwards, as promised, he called me a cab.

[BortimusPrime]

Funny how she refers to a guy in his late 20's as a "boy", and refers to herself at the same age as a "woman".

[EasyMoney]

I think heartiste had a post about this too, love it

[Chapped3rdEye]

> Oct 24, 2011

old article is old

[56merc]

(10-08-2012 03:15 PM)Chapped3rdEye Wrote:  

> Oct 24, 2011

old article is old

It's still pretty relevant I would say

[Pappy]

This is a perfect example why feminists are the easiest girls on earth. They are trained to be weak and go against their self control. Imagine if men were trained to go along anger instead of resisting hitting people in the face...

[WanderingSoul]

Quote:

But the way my date kissed me up against the brick wall outside the subway stop was enough to convince me my internal voice was an antiquated Debbie downer, squawking nonsense irrelevant for the modern woman.

[/quote]

So he man handled her against a brick wall late at night and then forced himself on her? Rapist....

[vinman]

(10-08-2012 03:08 PM)56merc Wrote:  

http://jezebel.com/5852666/sex-on-the-fi...ional-fuck

Here are some quotes from the story. This cat sounds like he could be a RVF member:

Quote:

He made me laugh. One drink turned into two, two neighborhood bars into three, and when he kissed me in the street, I was elated.

Quote:

As he walked me to the train, he asked me if I would come over for a nightcap. Just one. He offered to pay for a cab to take me home afterwards, as I had to work early.

Quote:

But the way my date kissed me up against the brick wall outside the subway stop was enough to convince me my internal voice was an antiquated Debbie downer, squawking nonsense irrelevant for the modern woman.

Quote:

I went to his house. We headed straight to the bedroom. Sex — intense, unexpected, rough and satisfying. Afterwards, as promised, he called me a cab.

Multiple changes of venue? Escalation? The Game is strong in this one.

[Tuthmosis]

Yeah:

   

[gringochileno]

I've seen this before but it is great. Almost every single line in the story beginning with "he walked in, 20 minutes late" (fucking lol) is either a description of the dude's tight game or the writer's hamster spinning like crazy.

I'm surprised Jizzabel let this comment through their filter:

Quote:

I like this aarticle. It's thoughtful and well-considered. But it misses one huge, gargantuan point.

I know it may be ideologically inappropriate, but a large number of men, perhaps even a majority, recoil from forging permanent relationship bonds with women who are "easy". This is a truth our mothers knew, and which proves itself time and time again.

The fact that there are exceptions to this rule, even in cases where men marry women they meet and have sex with immediately, is irrelevant. It's a trend, or tendency, not a rule.

The more value a man has in the dating market, the pickier he's going to be about having a real relationship. A really hot guy with a good job and excellent prospects can afford to pick and choose from among the (attractive) women whose character he admires most. And it's often only these men that women notice. What a shy, or easily available guy would put up with is only useful for a woman to know if she wants that guy, and not the hot one that all the women want.

It might be as the author claims, that it's just a delusion of attraction and sex. But this is what I read from this scenario.

The guy was interested in sex, and possibly also the woman, but definitely sex. The woman was interested in an engaging relationship with this guy, because she was really attracted to him in general terms, not just sexually.

He was able to psychologically disarm her sufficiently for her to rationalize away her fears. That's all it was. He opened the door, and she walked right through. He made it easy for her.

Most of what she writes later, the idea that it's just an idea, is likely unadulterated rationalization. She just doesn't want to accept the extremely obvious truth, obvious to almost any man who reads this, so obvious it almost doesn't need to be mentioned among groups of men - but something that women seem tragically unwilling to admit.

A man will sleep with many, many women. But for relationships, and any real committment, a man examines character. A woman who sleeps with him easily is a woman who will likely sleep with anyone easily. And such a woman is, fundamentally, less valuable than a woman who is more restrained.

You can agonize over and be angry about this. But it's true now. It's been true since forever. It was true two thousand years ago and it's true across almost all cultures I'm familiar with.

Rail against it all you want, no amount of training will excise this from men. This is how they think. It's how they think in Germany, in Pakistan, in China and in Nigeria, as well as in New York.

The reasons are obvious if you look for them. Should you be ideologically unwilling to even consider the raw uncomfortable truth of this, then by all means - continue.

[Roosh]

More evidence that game works best on those who make fun of it most.

[Basil Ransom]

(10-08-2012 07:05 PM)gringochileno Wrote:  

Quote:

A man will sleep with many, many women. But for relationships, and any real committment, a man examines character. A woman who sleeps with him easily is a woman who will likely sleep with anyone easily. And such a woman is, fundamentally, less valuable than a woman who is more restrained.

I've never been on that train. I don't judge women as 'lacking in character' because they fuck me on the first date. There are dozens of big and small tells that are far more indicative of her character and value as a mate. There are plenty of girls who will wait several dates while thinking nothing of having a one night stand, even while they're 'dating' a guy.

No, the reason girls should wait to have sex, if she's serious, is to make sure he actually likes her, and isn't just in it for the sex. What actually happens is that girls make the betas wait, and wait... and wait. By the time they're 'ready,' 'oops,' they banged a guy they met at a bar, and they've lost interest.

Roissy wrote a post a long way back about cherishing and appreciating the passionate women who let him hit on the first date. This whole idea of 'I'm going to reward chicks who pretend not to be a slut by making me wait' is retarded. It's tantamount to a cuckold fetish. Often, it's the sluts who have the easiest time holding out, or passionless prudes.