Posts: 3,369
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation:
67
SHUT THE F@#K UP!
07-13-2012, 10:22 PM
I was at work wasting a little time towards the end and decide to check out YouTube. I saw a Peter Schiff video posted that I hadn't seen before, and I thought I would check it out. It was ruined by some loud mouthed, disrespectful, entitled uber cunt that constantly interrupted and talked over him. I find this level of disrespect to be intolerable, and all too common. You speak and then you listen. You make a point and then wait for a counterpoint. It's basic civility. Take the test, and see how long you can listen to her.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3hc6LoAlu0
"Feminism is a trade union for ugly women"- Peregrine
Posts: 4,577
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2009
Reputation:
111
SHUT THE F@#K UP!
07-13-2012, 10:30 PM
I made it 6 seconds..
The chick is hot..at what time does she start putting phallus on her primary organ of gustation?
I just wanna skip to that part
I am the cock carousel
Posts: 686
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2012
Reputation:
3
SHUT THE F@#K UP!
07-14-2012, 01:05 AM
Chick is throwing shit at Peter Schiff like she was a chimpanzee. He makes the mistake of fighting to her frame and not letting her use her own momentum to hang herself.
This one is gonna fall off a cliff like a freight train around age 35.
Posts: 644
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
8
SHUT THE F@#K UP!
07-14-2012, 05:46 AM
Whoa! WTF! When did Maria B. hit the wall?
Posts: 4,883
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2011
Reputation:
39
SHUT THE F@#K UP!
07-14-2012, 03:17 PM
Unfortunately, this is the format that has become most popular on television. Let's get two or three people on split-screen, and let them shout over each other. The hosts and participants forget why they're on tv discussion a particular issue. They're there for US, not for themselves. They aren't there to raise their own profiles (though if they actually provide value, their profile WILL go up). They aren't there to try to compete against the others on the program, or to shout the other down or make them look bad. They're there to actually debate and discuss and issue, and to intelligently present why they think their view is the accurate one. We don't get that if everyone is talking at the same time.
My first issue with the chick is that she actually avoided the core issue. There will always be more elite colleges and universities that cost more. There will be others in the middle range. There will be others at the lower range, and then community colleges, trade schools etc. Everyone should be able to attend college if the want to, but not everyone can go to the most prestigious or expensive schools and incur ridiculous debt.
"The best kind of pride is that which compels a man to do his best when no one is watching."
Posts: 11,058
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation:
117
SHUT THE F@#K UP!
07-14-2012, 03:29 PM
They do need to reform the the majority of what is taught at college, but everyone should have access to good education.
This is obvious. Access to education is a necessity as is having a Police dept, Fire Dept., Army, etc.
Same for healthcare, a place to live, and food.
Posts: 1,094
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
10
SHUT THE F@#K UP!
07-14-2012, 03:44 PM
She is using the English-Speaking Tourist routine there; They don't understand your point? TALK LOUDER.
Someone should punch her in the face.
As far as student loads go; the whole thing is a waste of time anyway because you're going to have a whole generation of people never paying back the loan unless the economy fixes itself quickly, which is unlikely to happen.
Posts: 8,017
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2010
SHUT THE F@#K UP!
07-14-2012, 06:26 PM
Quote: (07-14-2012 03:17 PM)Timoteo Wrote:
Unfortunately, this is the format that has become most popular on television. Let's get two or three people on split-screen, and let them shout over each other. The hosts and participants forget why they're on tv discussion a particular issue. They're there for US, not for themselves. They aren't there to raise their own profiles (though if they actually provide value, their profile WILL go up). They aren't there to try to compete against the others on the program, or to shout the other down or make them look bad. They're there to actually debate and discuss and issue, and to intelligently present why they think their view is the accurate one. We don't get that if everyone is talking at the same time.
My first issue with the chick is that she actually avoided the core issue. There will always be more elite colleges and universities that cost more. There will be others in the middle range. There will be others at the lower range, and then community colleges, trade schools etc. Everyone should be able to attend college if the want to, but not everyone can go to the most prestigious or expensive schools and incur ridiculous debt.
I agree. This is a "vanilla" version of Jerry Springer. Also believe the networks line up the fight unfairly, to support their views, or at least get the bickering started. Obviously she wasn't near as educated on the subject as the other guy, and came off to me as intern. Did you notice how her eyes kept going high and to the right? I'd call that one staged.
Posts: 1,193
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation:
5
SHUT THE F@#K UP!
07-15-2012, 12:06 PM
lulz, who of you wrote the top comment?
Brought to you by Carl's Jr.