[ColSpanker]

Every since the $PLC put Master Roosh in their sites, I've been wondering what they will do next. But it also occurs to me they might have had one of their operatives register here and start stirring up a hornet's nest by posting controversial topics. And there are enough posters here to give them any number of quotes which could be used to justify their "position".
So do you think there is a "Mole" posting things on the forum just to get it shut-down?

[Walnuts]

How could they get rvf shut down?
There are far worse things on the Internet.

[Kickb]

I think Roosh said that due to all of the bad press the SPLC recieved, they decided to take his site and others off of the list.

[Tuthmosis]

My sense is that whatever "mole" would probably be more of a lurker. Anything retarded, illegal, dangerous, or strange will get that member banned, or at least warned. They probably just lurk waiting for us to do something wrong--which we won't, cause we don't. At the some point, they'll realize this is like eavesdropping on the men's locker room or a table of dudes at a Dave and Buster's, get bored, and move on.

@kickboxer: I don't know what you're talking about. I still still see the list as is.

[Deluge]

There a lot of forums out there which are a lot larger, more established and far far more controversial from RVF. If G-men really went around shutting down non-PC internet forums then there wouldn't be a StormFront, so we have nothing to worry about.

[WanderingSoul]

(05-15-2012 05:49 AM)P Dog Wrote:  

There a lot of forums out there which are a lot larger, more established and far far more controversial from RVF. If G-men really went around shutting down non-PC internet forums then there wouldn't be a StormFront, so we have nothing to worry about.

They can't shut down StormFront, it may have the BEST dating advice section EVER! Shit is hilarious.

I've lived with my gf for 4 years but recently I have started seeing disturbing signs of possible dishonesty on her side. I've got a friend, we've been through a lot, he's a nice guy, very confident and assertive, I learn a lot from him. But since I introduced him to my gf a few months ago, well.

Now she often asks him to visit us and makes food for him, they talk with each other more than with me. I hired a man to spy on them to see if he sees them together etc, and he reported that he had seen them walk and hold hands, make out in the park and saw them dance very dirty dances at a night club. Also he told me she often goes to his house and spends there 4-5 hours once-twice a week. She tells me she helps him with housekeeping (and that's probably true - he never cared about his dwelling and it's a bit of a mess there).

I got mad and had a really tough talk with her, she cried and said it was all bull****, they were just friends and she loved me and me only. I started to control her life, calling her every half an hour, checking her whereabouts, but I'm getting tired of it and it certainly is not helping our relationship.

I'm at a loss and every day is a bad day for me since my mind is occupied with this bs. I can't concentrate on work and anything else.

What's the chance they had sex together and if they did, I would probably.. I dunno, split? But I love her.

Maybe they really are just friends and there's nothing wrong with it. Friends are good.

I never talked to him about this, if anything, it's the girl's fault, not the guy's.






Quote:
Originally Posted by CircleWood View Post
Honestly, I like this woman. 5'11", 170lbs.#little thick,

First of all at 5'11" and 170 lbs, she is not a little thick. She is within her normal weight range according to BMI. Maybe the problem is that you are shallow and guided by your lower brain and not your upper one?







is my girlfriend cheating?
this happened about 1 yr ago, and she still denies it to this day. I dont believe she is cheating on me now, but I do think she cheated on my before. heres the whole long story.


I used to come home from work, after being gone at work all day all the time(she didnt work, just stayed home all the time) and she would be a psycho bitch for no reason. And we would argue, she than would get all pissed off and storm out of the house and take off for several hours, saying she was going to the park. Which I do infact beleive she was going to the park in the beginning. Now one day after a fight and from hanging out at the park all day she says she met a guy that was interested in buying a puppy (i breed and sell dogs). The guy text like once or twice about a dog, but after that he texted quite a few more times just saying how r u doing and stuff like this, sometimes late at night, 11pm or so. (we only have 1 cell phone we share). Now from this day on, we would get into arguments and stuff like always, again for no reason other than the fact i came home from work. So we argue, she gets pissed off, but now these times, before she storms off to the park, she goes and gets all dressed up, puts on makeup etc. makes sure she takes the cell phone, and than takes off for 5-6 hours. Did I mention this was in the heat of the summer, when it was regularly 100+ degrees outside?!?! and she would walk to the "park" and hang out outside all day in the heat? I dont think so, when she complains about the heat so much and wont even step outside. And one time I picked her up from a park that was kinda far away that i/we had no idea it was there we were new to the area (im guessing he lived around there as it was not the park close to our house). Saying she walked there, coming from a girl who complains about the walk to a store from a parking lot if I park in the back instead of the front when the parking lot is crowded! She knows alot about computers, much more than me, which is why I am surprised I caught her with this next mistake. I came home from work, go on the computer, on the desktop is some downloaded file, I open it up and its a few pictures of some guy with his shirt off, like cellphone type pics. Her excuse was he aimed her and sent her the pic from a chatroom. Now if you are familiar with aim, you would know that in order to send and share pics you must ACCEPT them. and she tried to come up with some excuse that it just sends it. but thats not the case, you must ACCEPT any type of file. Wanted to ad that she got dressed up and stormed off to the park in 100 degree plus wether for 5-6 hours about 5 times. Also that at the time I was working 4-6 days a week, 10 hour days. So I was basically gone all the time and she had enough free time to get away with anything.

Heres, what I think happened.

She met some guy at the park, used the puppy as an excuse to communicate( sometimes when i was at work she would have phone, and sometimes i would, as we have only 1 and share it)

Got his number, and than used AIM to text/im eachother and exchange pictures.

Got into arguments with me, got all pretty for him, brought cell phone, went to park. Called him to come pick her up. Hung out with him for 5-6 hours. gets dropped off, than comes home.

there is no way she stayed outside in that heat for that many hours. Not saying its not possible, I could do it. But I know her and theres no way in hell she sat outside in that crazy heat.

storming off to the park happened 5 times. which means she left my house to have him pick her up 5 times. thats what I know about, not too mention how many other times she left while I was at work(?). lets just say it was 5. that means she hung out with the dude 10 times. and if she hung out with the dude 10 times. he probably banged her.

the other thing is there was a park right next to our house. that is where she "went" but one time, she called me to pick her up from some random small park pretty much hidden in a nieghborhood, that was way to far away for HER to walk which makes me think he lives somewhere around there. theres no way she walked to that park in that heat, theres no way she sat at that park in that heat all day. and how the hell did she know where that park was?

your thoughts?

[Walnuts]

Jesus....

These guys need rvf more than anyone.

[Walnuts]

This was on the front page.
Unbelievable

[Roosh]

Quote:

But it also occurs to me they might have had one of their operatives register here and start stirring up a hornet's nest by posting controversial topics.

If they linked to specific threads as part of their attack on me that happened to be from the same user, it's possible, but the forum gets only random negative attention from reddit. In fact, besides the Brazilian government email that was unrelated, things have been quiet since they put out their list. Compare that to Don't Bang Denmark, which is still getting articles written about it in the Danish media.

As for the SPLC, they came out to say that the misogynist list does not mean that those on it were designated as a hate group.

http://www.dailydot.com/news/reddit-mens...inyourface

I believe that list was a way to feel out the response to determine if they should strengthen their attack on "misogynists." It was more a warning shot. Since they got almost a universal negative response, I predict they will back off for quite some time until trying again in the distant future. I'm not worried.

P.S. I think the word you're looking for is "agent provocateur."

[Kitsune]

RooshV forum is 'The Mole.'


We're living in 1984, and it is only getting worse. Make no mistakes, we're the undercover agents working to bring this system down.

[Deluge]

(05-15-2012 10:49 AM)Walnuts Wrote:  

This was on the front page.
Unbelievable

Anybody have a pedestal handy? Ode to the Aryan Feminine

Helps confirm my suspicion that the primary root of racism is securing exclusive access to the groups females. Back to the topic, you guys need to stop being so paranoid.

[R Smoov]

Even if they were to shut this forum down, I'm sure we'd be smart enough to
1) Backup the info that we have on this forum so that nothing important is lost (At least keep the data sheets).
2) Make a brand new forum.

So whatever they do isn't going to harm us as long as we save and store all of our gems.

[porcupine]

(05-14-2012 10:51 AM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

My sense is that whatever "mole" would probably be more of a lurker. Anything retarded, illegal, dangerous, or strange will get that member banned, or at least warned. They probably just lurk waiting for us to do something wrong--which we won't, cause we don't. At the some point, they'll realize this is like eavesdropping on the men's locker room or a table of dudes at a Dave and Buster's, get bored, and move on.

@kickboxer: I don't know what you're talking about. I still still see the list as is.

I'm surprised they didn't try harder to demonize the sites since anyone with half a brain can see that the majority of there's nothing wrong with the majority of them.

[ColSpanker]

Yes, that is the phrase I had in mind. I bow to you knowledge, Sensei.
Just the same, this forum has been "noticed" and that is not a good thing.

(05-15-2012 04:51 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Quote:

But it also occurs to me they might have had one of their operatives register here and start stirring up a hornet's nest by posting controversial topics.

If they linked to specific threads as part of their attack on me that happened to be from the same user, it's possible, but the forum gets only random negative attention from reddit. In fact, besides the Brazilian government email that was unrelated, things have been quiet since they put out their list. Compare that to Don't Bang Denmark, which is still getting articles written about it in the Danish media.

As for the SPLC, they came out to say that the misogynist list does not mean that those on it were designated as a hate group.

http://www.dailydot.com/news/reddit-mens...inyourface

I believe that list was a way to feel out the response to determine if they should strengthen their attack on "misogynists." It was more a warning shot. Since they got almost a universal negative response, I predict they will back off for quite some time until trying again in the distant future. I'm not worried.

P.S. I think the word you're looking for is "agent provocateur."

[Roosh]

ColSpanker: either way, no need to try and drum up anxiety just because of getting "noticed"

[Kitsune]

(05-16-2012 12:51 PM)Rosca Wrote:  

Even if they were to shut this forum down, I'm sure we'd be smart enough to
1) Backup the info that we have on this forum so that nothing important is lost (At least keep the data sheets).
2) Make a brand new forum.

So whatever they do isn't going to harm us as long as we save and store all of our gems.

To paraphrase Gandalf himself: One does not simply delete an Internet site.

To paraphrase Lovecraft: That which is on the internet will forever lie, and in strange aeons WEBSITES THAT ARE TAKEN DOWN ARE CACHED IN NUMEROUS PLACES ACROSS THE INTERNET, and so their death may die.

[Hades]

(05-15-2012 10:49 AM)Walnuts Wrote:  

This was on the front page.
Unbelievable

I like Ebert's movie reviews but he has alienated himself from what is man. I doubt he had much success sexually (as he did intend to marry a post-op transwoman). He looks very soft (beta) and probably never played a contact sport. Probably had more women friends than dude friends growing up, so how hard is it to sell out your gender when you were never privy to the company of men in the first place?

I don't fault him for his women-worship and liberalism, though you can't say he doesn't walk the walk. I respect his soft-handed intellectualism.

If there was one review of his I didn't like, it was definitely "Dirty Harry". He conflates badass vigilantism with fascism. No doubt a hardcase like Clint Eastwood would inspire fear in somebody like Ebert.

To paraphrase "Mother's Day": his essay has done what no PSA could have accomplished. As a result of him writing the essay, there are no unclean female taints in the western hemisphere. He owes them one anyway.

[Screwston]

(05-15-2012 10:49 AM)Walnuts Wrote:  

This was on the front page.
Unbelievable

Geez he needs to be slapped back into reality. What a little bitch.